| Revision as of 22:58, 7 May 2006 view sourcePegasus1138 (talk | contribs)4,204 editsm →It's not vandalism: adding my signature← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:00, 7 May 2006 view source Cyde (talk | contribs)28,155 edits →It's not vandalismNext edit → | ||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
| It's not vandalism to remove the cartoons. ] | It's not vandalism to remove the cartoons. ] | ||
| :Yes it is, you removing them are detrimental to the article and you removed them for non-encyclopedic reasons, not to mention against a strong community consensus, thus it qualifies as vandalism. <small>]</small><sup>] | ] | ]</sup> ---- 22:58, 7 May 2006 (UTC) | :Yes it is, you removing them are detrimental to the article and you removed them for non-encyclopedic reasons, not to mention against a strong community consensus, thus it qualifies as vandalism. <small>]</small><sup>] | ] | ]</sup> ---- 22:58, 7 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Yeah, and it's not murder if you kill someone over the cartoons because the cartoons made you do it. --] 23:00, 7 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:00, 7 May 2006
Reward board
Congratulations on being the first to offer a reward on the new reward board! I was just wondering how you were intending to judge who is responsible for bringing Megatokyo to featured status. The person with the most edits? The person who asks first? I'm somewhat doubtful that your challenge will be met by 2007 though (the only featured website at present is Misplaced Pages, and Misplaced Pages is already systematically biased to computer-related topics) but I think these rewards still need to be thought through, to set a precedent. BigBlueFish 15:37, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
- I will judge the reward when reported to me that it has been met by checking the talk page, checking edit summaries, and if needed even diff checking to see who did the most work and if more than one person did a lot of work I'll split it between them depending on the work they've done. Pegasus1138 ---- 19:39, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
User talk:Cool Cat/Legend...
I hope you don't mind but I did some slight modifications to the legend including making it so that it only included the top portion without the examples if transcluded into a page, and I also changed it slightly so that it has a header to that section only when transcluded but doesn't appear on the original version. Feel free to revert if you don't like them but I hope they help make it look better. Pegasus1138 ---- 05:31, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- I do mind. And all I have to say is thank you. :) Keep up the good work. and no I have no problem with it, and infact I actualy like it. :) Hence I refuse to revert --Cat out 23:02, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Ultimate Destiny.
I received a message re: copyright violation.
That was not my edit (my edit purely concerned changing 'Ran' to 'Run' as a grammatical correction to Santa's fatality. --82.46.190.20 04:14, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 1st.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 2, Issue 18 | 1 May 2006 | |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
new poll on personal attacks
Yesterday you took part in a short discussion on a list of fascists on en.wiki. Sure, I do not have the time to translate every rubbish. The fact is that this article, titled "fascists on en:", writes "Jossi, who hides himself behind an allias, will restrict the freedom of speech to every wikipedian... Another fascist, Dmcdevit, is helping him... ...", and then follows a list "list of fascists", where this mornig i have seen 8 names, in the noon other five names were added. See . As far as I know there are also some links to his page on cs.wiki, en.wiki and meta. Anyway, there is a new quick opinion poll that is now posted on the Talk page there. Your input is appreciated! See Wikipedia_talk:No_personal_attacks#Poll:_Off-wiki_Personal_Attacks Thx, -jkb- 14:03, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
Why did you remove my comment from main page talk?
Ehm, why did you? 87.122.14.230 19:56, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
- I removed it because it was pointless spam and had nothing to do with the main page, see the notice at the top of Talk:Main Page where it says quite clearly that off topic discussions will be removed. Pegasus1138 ---- 19:58, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry to disagree. It was neither spam not pointless. I was trying to draw attention to a blatant error with an article linked from the main page. In other words, I was trying to help you improve your encyclopedia, and if I chose the wrong place to make my point, that does not invalidate the point itself. Please read before you delete. Thank you. 87.122.14.230 20:01, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
- In the future please use a better summary of the issue and a better edit summary because this is definitely going to be misinterpreted by almost anyone. Pegasus1138 ---- 20:08, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
It's not vandalism
It's not vandalism to remove the cartoons. 200.51.32.150
- Yes it is, you removing them are detrimental to the article and you removed them for non-encyclopedic reasons, not to mention against a strong community consensus, thus it qualifies as vandalism. Pegasus1138 ---- 22:58, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, and it's not murder if you kill someone over the cartoons because the cartoons made you do it. --Cyde Weys 23:00, 7 May 2006 (UTC)