Revision as of 13:14, 10 November 2012 editNova4576 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,128 edits →Rename the username for all wiki, 10 November 2012← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:50, 10 November 2012 edit undoDennis Brown (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions69,230 edits →Arb: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
Hey, hate to violate the stereotype of how I roll, but really? The guy's userpage says his name is Shaiful and he wants to work in marketing. What in all that justifies a username block? --] | ] 00:05, 10 November 2012 (UTC) | Hey, hate to violate the stereotype of how I roll, but really? The guy's userpage says his name is Shaiful and he wants to work in marketing. What in all that justifies a username block? --] | ] 00:05, 10 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Fixed. Thanks for pointing that out. I was ABFing about his intent. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 00:17, 10 November 2012 (UTC) | :Fixed. Thanks for pointing that out. I was ABFing about his intent. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 00:17, 10 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
== Arb == | |||
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at ] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use— | |||
* ]; | |||
* ]. | |||
Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbcom notice --> ] - ] ] <small><b>]</b></small> 20:50, 10 November 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:50, 10 November 2012
Hi, This is just my talk page, feel free to leave any advice on my edits or ask for help on anything. If you feel I've abused my administrative or BAG powers, please see User:MBisanz/Recall for further instructions to request their removal.
This is MBisanz's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23Auto-archiving period: 5 days |
Archives |
Index |
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Category tracker for CAT:DFUI | |
---|---|
Category | # of items |
Disputed non-free Misplaced Pages files as of 28 July 2011 | 4 |
Disputed non-free Misplaced Pages files as of 30 July 2011 | 1 |
Disputed non-free Misplaced Pages files as of 2 August 2011 | 1 |
Disputed non-free Misplaced Pages files as of 3 August 2011 | 6 |
Updated: 08:20, 4 August 2011 (UTC) |
Rename the username, 17 october 2012
hello MBisanz, please rename my username.
Usage
- Current name: Blaugranaz (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (ping user)
- Requested name: Cordobaes (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google)
- Previous renames: current user, target user, Queue: open req, closed req
- AntiSpoof: antispoof check
- For global renamer: rename user
UFC on FX: Sotiropoulos vs. Pearson needs to be restored
It passes the notability guidelines as a major sports title is being fought for, namely the title of "The Ultimate Fighter: The Smashes Winner". That is actually a title and a TUF winner trophy is given to the winner. MtKing is on an anti-UFC crusade and is clearly biased, he disappeared for awhile after his last anti-UFC crusade failed, but it appears he's back, I with all due respect must ask that you dont help him with his anti-UFC crusade, for it is a legitimate sport, just as baseball, football, and boxing are legitimate sports. Thanks. JonnyBonesJones (talk) 22:25, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- The issue was the IP's comments, not the notability of the concept or MtKing. I'll tweak it down to semi-protection in a day or two and let it continue under normal editing. MBisanz 23:27, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Ok thanks. JonnyBonesJones (talk) 03:04, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I know nothing about these articles but there seems to be some support for retaining these articles. Therefore I have lowered your protection on UFC on Fuel TV: Franklin vs. Le and I am just letting you know this. Protecting this in MtKing's preferred version seemed inappropriate, unless there is other stuff I'm not aware of. (Can I ask where the request was lodged? Because looking at your contribs around that time does not clarify how this protection arose.) I suggest that MtKing take these articles to AfD to reach a consensus rather than the redirect+protect route. Regards — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:54, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
- I don't see anything in my email or IRC log, so I think it was done when I clicked his contributions after answering his unrelated request above. Lowering the protection seems fine. Next time I might just block the IP instead of protecting. Thanks for the note. MBisanz 18:00, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
- The page is still protected. Can you unprotect it at your soonest convenience please? Oskar Liljeblad (talk) 07:48, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Threatening editors for appealing discretionary sanctions
I would request you withdraw your threat of a block made at . Whether or not it is prudent for a member of the committee to discuss an appeal on their own talk page, he did, and he asked Zeromus1 to provide evidence. Zeromus1 did just that, and it is grossly unjust for you to threaten him with a block for it. Discretionary sanctions explicitly permit appeal to the committee, and discussing such an appeal with an member, and doing so in response to that member's question, is clearly within that exception. Monty845 20:28, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
- I disagree. He's not discussing an appeal of his own ban, he's discussing his desire for Mathsci to be further sanctioned. Discretionary sanctions permit Zeromus1 to appeal his own interaction ban, not for Zeromus1 to join Cla68's request for a case to add sanctions onto Mathsci. MBisanz 21:09, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
- Further, Zeromus1 initiated the thread on AGK's talkpage instead of incorporating his request into his Arbcom statement or into a request on the relevant Arbcom page or in an email to Arbcom. Zeromus1 was aware of the ban and selected an option that violated the letter of the ban when other alternatives were available that would not violate the ban. MBisanz 21:14, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Mass delete request
Can you delete everything under User:WolfBot/source? The source is now on GitHub, so these pages are no longer needed. Thanks! Wolfgang42 (talk) 00:14, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
User rename: old name still in use
Hi, you performed the rename at Misplaced Pages:Changing username/Simple/Archive123#RB-AXP → RB-ASHISH - I've found that RB-AXP (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) is still making edits; but RB-ASHISH (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) isn't (the only contribs listed are those which were actually made by RB-AXP prior to the rename). What's the procedure to follow in such cases? --Redrose64 (talk) 19:31, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
- Generally drop him a note and remind him the rename went through. He should remember and move to the new account. As long as he's editing from one account, it shouldn't be a problem. MBisanz 19:34, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Afd: James Norman
Hi, Mbisanz. Thanks for relisting James Norman! Two additional posts have come in following the relist. The article had already been added to the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions and the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions, but as is so often the case, the day after listing articles get forgotten. Do you have any suggestions for stimulating additional discussion? Thanks! --Rhombus (talk) 20:30, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
- It looks like it will close in 3 days (?). Assuming there are no more comments, I would be inclined to close as delete at that time. MBisanz 20:47, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 November 2012
- Op-ed: 2012 WikiCup comes to an end
- News and notes: Wikimedian photographic talent on display in national submissions to Wiki Loves Monuments
- In the media: Was climate change a factor in Hurricane Sandy?
- Discussion report: Protected Page Editor right; Gibraltar hooks
- Featured content: Jack-O'-Lanterns and Toads
- Technology report: Hue, Sqoop, Oozie, Zookeeper, Hive, Pig and Kafka
- WikiProject report: Listening to WikiProject Songs
Software Change?
Just out of curiosity, was there a software change with the username changes?
I noticed all of my edits are here, but previously, people had to wait a few days for all of their edits to convert over from their old account to their new account. - Amaury (talk) 16:45, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
- It's really random and entirely depends on the mood of server farm at the time of rename. MBisanz 16:46, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Hello, MBisanz. You have new messages at Jimbo Wales's talk page.Message added 21:35, 8 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Mentioned your name Elen of the Roads (talk) 21:35, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note. I've been fairly vocal in recent months over the conflation of editor retention with AGF as a suicide pact, so I don't mind more eyes. MBisanz 22:58, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
note
Just occurred to me that I mentioned your name, so I thought I should drop you a note : ) - jc37 23:21, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. I don't specifically remember starting such an RFC, but it's certainly possible I did. MBisanz 23:30, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- You're right - I was thinking of your comments here on how a bot could potentially do it. - jc37 23:38, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- Ahh, ok. MBisanz 23:44, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry for the confusion. (That's what I get for actually reading all of someone's comments and not just something enboldened : ) - jc37 23:49, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- Ahh, ok. MBisanz 23:44, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- You're right - I was thinking of your comments here on how a bot could potentially do it. - jc37 23:38, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
User:Shaifulmarketing: What in all that justifies a username block?
Hey, hate to violate the stereotype of how I roll, but really? The guy's userpage says his name is Shaiful and he wants to work in marketing. What in all that justifies a username block? --Orange Mike | Talk 00:05, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed. Thanks for pointing that out. I was ABFing about his intent. MBisanz 00:17, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Arb
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests#Resysoping of FCYTravis / Polarscribe and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks, Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 20:50, 10 November 2012 (UTC)