| Revision as of 11:22, 19 December 2012 editMtking (talk | contribs)Rollbackers12,481 edits Creating deletion discussion page for UFC 158. (TW) | Revision as of 15:16, 19 December 2012 edit undoWilldawg111 (talk | contribs)1,760 edits →UFC 158Next edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| :({{Find sources|UFC 158}}) | :({{Find sources|UFC 158}}) | ||
| This sports event fails ] '''policy''', the event is still about three months away, the numerous ] ] sources quoted just cover the announcements of who is going to appear which NOTNEWSPAPER explicitly says "''is not a sufficient basis for inclusion in the encyclopedia''. There is no attempt in the article to demonstrate what the ] of this event will be, there will I have no doubt be 11 winners and 11 looser but beond that any significance at this stage will be pure ].</br> For the avoidance of doubt this nomination has '''nothing''' to do with the events ] or not, as a professional sports event, meeting the ] is not in doubt, however that is no guarantee of a subjects suitability for an article in an encyclopedia if, as in this case, it fails the ] policy. ]]<sup>]</sup> 11:22, 19 December 2012 (UTC) | This sports event fails ] '''policy''', the event is still about three months away, the numerous ] ] sources quoted just cover the announcements of who is going to appear which NOTNEWSPAPER explicitly says "''is not a sufficient basis for inclusion in the encyclopedia''. There is no attempt in the article to demonstrate what the ] of this event will be, there will I have no doubt be 11 winners and 11 looser but beond that any significance at this stage will be pure ].</br> For the avoidance of doubt this nomination has '''nothing''' to do with the events ] or not, as a professional sports event, meeting the ] is not in doubt, however that is no guarantee of a subjects suitability for an article in an encyclopedia if, as in this case, it fails the ] policy. ]]<sup>]</sup> 11:22, 19 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''': It's an upcoming UFC event. Why delete it and redo it later. Leave it up and people can build on it as information becomes available. At 3 months out, we will start seeing the fight card come together over the next couple weeks. Absolutely silly to try to delete it.] (]) 15:16, 19 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:16, 19 December 2012
UFC 158
- UFC 158 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy, the event is still about three months away, the numerous primary routine sources quoted just cover the announcements of who is going to appear which NOTNEWSPAPER explicitly says "is not a sufficient basis for inclusion in the encyclopedia. There is no attempt in the article to demonstrate what the lasting significance of this event will be, there will I have no doubt be 11 winners and 11 looser but beond that any significance at this stage will be pure speculation.
For the avoidance of doubt this nomination has nothing to do with the events notability or not, as a professional sports event, meeting the WP:GNG is not in doubt, however that is no guarantee of a subjects suitability for an article in an encyclopedia if, as in this case, it fails the inclusion policy. Mtking 11:22, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
- Keep: It's an upcoming UFC event. Why delete it and redo it later. Leave it up and people can build on it as information becomes available. At 3 months out, we will start seeing the fight card come together over the next couple weeks. Absolutely silly to try to delete it.Willdawg111 (talk) 15:16, 19 December 2012 (UTC)