| Revision as of 20:53, 20 December 2012 editKnowledgekid87 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers96,592 edits →Archangel class assault ship: Delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:58, 22 December 2012 edit undoJclemens (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers45,438 edits →Archangel class assault ship: kNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| *'''Delete''' Fails per ] and ]. - ] (]) 20:53, 20 December 2012 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Fails per ] and ]. - ] (]) 20:53, 20 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' Nominator was found to have previous socked to attempt to delete ''this specific article'', as is documented in the above, and as such should be perpetually ineligible for such a re-nomination. Failing that, it should be '''merge'''d to a list of other non-notable fictional elements if the coverage is insufficient, per ]. ] (]) 20:58, 22 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:58, 22 December 2012
Archangel class assault ship
AfDs for this article:- Archangel class assault ship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable fictional spaceship - no significant coverage in third party reliable sources. Claritas § 08:10, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete I am surprised that this even survived the last AfD, even with tons of Gundam related sources on my shelves, I don't find this notable. Also, it seems like the last AfD consensus tends towards a merge or delete but only kept because who initiated the AfD was blocked. But again, it simply showed that I like Gundam comment in the other AfD a complete lie. Just another WP:IDONTKNOWIT and WP:IDONTLIKEIT type of mass AfD wiki user. —Preceding signed comment added by MythSearcher 09:13, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Zero wp:notability-suitable references on this fictional ship type. North8000 (talk) 12:26, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 20:35, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 20:35, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Fails per WP:N and WP:NOTPLOT. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:53, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Nominator was found to have previous socked to attempt to delete this specific article, as is documented in the above, and as such should be perpetually ineligible for such a re-nomination. Failing that, it should be merged to a list of other non-notable fictional elements if the coverage is insufficient, per WP:ATD. Jclemens (talk) 20:58, 22 December 2012 (UTC)