Revision as of 11:00, 13 January 2013 editFunkMonk (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers102,629 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:40, 13 January 2013 edit undoJ Milburn (talk | contribs)Administrators129,890 edits →Réunion Ibis: Support and image checkNext edit → | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*Compare FNs 11 and 17. ] (]) 03:23, 13 January 2013 (UTC) | *Compare FNs 11 and 17. ] (]) 03:23, 13 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
::I think all these issues should be fixed now. ] (]) 10:59, 13 January 2013 (UTC) | ::I think all these issues should be fixed now. ] (]) 10:59, 13 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
*'''Support''' as per my good article review. A very strong article on a very interesting topic. ] (]) 22:40, 13 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
*'''Images''' are fine; all PD. A few are not Commons-safe, but they are uploaded locally and appropriately tagged. ] (]) 22:40, 13 January 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:40, 13 January 2013
Réunion Ibis
Réunion Ibis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): FunkMonk (talk) 16:31, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
I am nominating this for featured article because I have added practically all known info about, most PD images, and presented all controversies relating to the bird, and it has also been copyedited. FunkMonk (talk) 16:31, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Source review - spotchecks not done
- FN5: publisher?
- FN9, 10: formatting
- Compare FNs 11 and 17. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:23, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- I think all these issues should be fixed now. FunkMonk (talk) 10:59, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support as per my good article review. A very strong article on a very interesting topic. J Milburn (talk) 22:40, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Images are fine; all PD. A few are not Commons-safe, but they are uploaded locally and appropriately tagged. J Milburn (talk) 22:40, 13 January 2013 (UTC)