| Revision as of 12:37, 13 January 2013 editLittleBenW (talk | contribs)8,599 edits →ArbCom request: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:25, 17 January 2013 edit undoDapi89 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users52,627 edits →Your comment: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| Hello PBS, Happy New Year. | Hello PBS, Happy New Year. | ||
| I've mentioned you in an ] submission. While you are not a party, your comments would be appreciated. ] (]) 12:37, 13 January 2013 (UTC) | I've mentioned you in an ] submission. While you are not a party, your comments would be appreciated. ] (]) 12:37, 13 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == Your comment == | |||
| See my reply Phillip. I am suspicious of your sudden interest in this dispute. You must realise it will have no bearing on the outcome of the consus of the title change. I am entitled to state my opinion on your attiutde on this article if I choose to do so. I have not received an adequate response to your resistance to the the operational commanders being added, other than, I presume, it was me that added it. I have only edited this article several times over the past few years, but you - and you alone - have contested every single change to the content. Why? It is quite acceptable to complain that these unreasonable complaints slow down its progression. Editors like me like to get on with things. Under the circumstances I'm justified in saying what I said - which is an observation, not an attack. ] (]) 10:25, 17 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:25, 17 January 2013
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 Archives | |
|
|
You have a message
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Disambiguation link notification for January 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Maxwell Wallace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prince Leopold (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Battle of Berlin
My intend was simply to use the correct dash. I have no strong opinion regarding the name of the article. MisterBee1966 (talk) 18:43, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Okay, understood MisterBee1966 (talk) 18:45, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
ArbCom request
Hello PBS, Happy New Year. I've mentioned you in an ArbCom case request submission. While you are not a party, your comments would be appreciated. LittleBen (talk) 12:37, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Your comment
See my reply Phillip. I am suspicious of your sudden interest in this dispute. You must realise it will have no bearing on the outcome of the consus of the title change. I am entitled to state my opinion on your attiutde on this article if I choose to do so. I have not received an adequate response to your resistance to the the operational commanders being added, other than, I presume, it was me that added it. I have only edited this article several times over the past few years, but you - and you alone - have contested every single change to the content. Why? It is quite acceptable to complain that these unreasonable complaints slow down its progression. Editors like me like to get on with things. Under the circumstances I'm justified in saying what I said - which is an observation, not an attack. Dapi89 (talk) 10:25, 17 January 2013 (UTC)