Misplaced Pages

:Peer review/Ugetsu/archive1: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Peer review Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:22, 20 January 2013 editHijiri88 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users37,389 edits Ugetsu← Previous edit Revision as of 04:26, 20 January 2013 edit undoJoshuSasori (talk | contribs)7,580 edits UgetsuNext edit →
Line 11: Line 11:


:'''Comment''' Please read ]. You are clearly just posting this here in order to ''continue'' undermining my edits to the article. Whether or not the article is good now, it doesn't mean it is "complete" and nothing new can be added. ] (]) 04:22, 20 January 2013 (UTC) :'''Comment''' Please read ]. You are clearly just posting this here in order to ''continue'' undermining my edits to the article. Whether or not the article is good now, it doesn't mean it is "complete" and nothing new can be added. ] (]) 04:22, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
::No, my other peer review ended and I want to get comments. Please note that ] and ] (self-identifying as anon IP editor) have both contributed much more substantial edits to the article than you. No disruption intended. ] (]) 04:26, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:26, 20 January 2013

Ugetsu

Toolbox
Article (edit | visual edit | history· Article talk (edit | history· WatchWatch peer review

I've listed this article for peer review because recently there has been substantial interest in improving this article from several editors. It would be great to get objective third-party opinions about the article to give guidance for how to best improve it.

Thanks, JoshuSasori (talk) 04:18, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Comment Please read WP:POINT. You are clearly just posting this here in order to continue undermining my edits to the article. Whether or not the article is good now, it doesn't mean it is "complete" and nothing new can be added. elvenscout742 (talk) 04:22, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
No, my other peer review ended and I want to get comments. Please note that User:Ribbet32 and User:Deoliveirafan (self-identifying as anon IP editor) have both contributed much more substantial edits to the article than you. No disruption intended. JoshuSasori (talk) 04:26, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Categories: