Misplaced Pages

Talk:Suffolk County Police Department: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:10, 21 January 2013 editRyulong (talk | contribs)218,132 editsm Ryulong moved page Talk:Suffolk County Police Department (New York) to Talk:Suffolk County Police Department over redirect: why is this dabbed?← Previous edit Revision as of 07:12, 21 January 2013 edit undoRyulong (talk | contribs)218,132 edits Title of this articleNext edit →
Line 18: Line 18:


Reading the above discussion it is clear that there is no consensus for the change. In addition to this, there were two procedural faults in the way the page was renamed: (1) There was admin-shopping. That is to say, the move was requested, rejected by an administrator, and then requested again, in the hope that another administrator would do it. This practice of trying successive admins until you get one who does what you want is not considered acceptable. (2) The article was tagged with {{tl|db-move}}. This tag asserts that the move is non-controversial, but the tag was re-added ''after the tag had already been declined by an administrator''. In this situation it is impossible that the tagging could be thought to be "non-controversial", and so it should not have been used. This issue was discussed at ], and the disambiguation was added as a result of that discussion. Anyone wishing to revert that change should discuss it first. For all these reasons the article should be moved back to the disambiguated version. ] (]) 07:21, 19 July 2010 (UTC) Reading the above discussion it is clear that there is no consensus for the change. In addition to this, there were two procedural faults in the way the page was renamed: (1) There was admin-shopping. That is to say, the move was requested, rejected by an administrator, and then requested again, in the hope that another administrator would do it. This practice of trying successive admins until you get one who does what you want is not considered acceptable. (2) The article was tagged with {{tl|db-move}}. This tag asserts that the move is non-controversial, but the tag was re-added ''after the tag had already been declined by an administrator''. In this situation it is impossible that the tagging could be thought to be "non-controversial", and so it should not have been used. This issue was discussed at ], and the disambiguation was added as a result of that discussion. Anyone wishing to revert that change should discuss it first. For all these reasons the article should be moved back to the disambiguated version. ] (]) 07:21, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

This is ridiculous. There are no other articles on Misplaced Pages with the title "Suffolk County Police Department". Therefore, there should be no disambiguation on this page simply because this refers to the Suffolk County of New York.—] (]) 07:12, 21 January 2013 (UTC)


== The red highlight on the map on upper right of article is inaccurate. == == The red highlight on the map on upper right of article is inaccurate. ==

Revision as of 07:12, 21 January 2013

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Suffolk County Police Department article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
WikiProject iconNew York (state): Long Island B‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Misplaced Pages:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Long Island, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
WikiProject iconLaw Enforcement B‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

An edit made to the article

Does this belong in the article? Enigma 18:14, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Title of this article

Note: The following discussion is moved here from my talk page. It is more appropriate here. I think that reverting to either the original title "Suffolk County Police Department (New York)" or EEng's suggested "Suffolk County (New York) Police Department" would be preferable. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:23, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

There is currently no other articles by the title "Suffolk County Police Department". It is entirely unnecessary to disambiguate the one in New York as such. The same goes for Suffolk County Sheriff's Office. Disambiguating it, but leaving the only redirect to it, is entirely unnecessary. Also, the English articles are at Suffolk Constabulary, not "County Police Department".—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:12, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

The reuse in state after state of names like Suffolk, Norfolk, Middlesex is so prevalent that the chance of their being another Suffolk County, with a Police (instead of the usual Sheriff's) Department is far from negligible. Why wait until there's a conflict and then do a confusing move? The article should be Suffolk County (New York) Police Department. EEng (talk) 02:17, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

But there is no other article with a similar title. Why bother disambiguating in the first place when it's the only one with that name?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:28, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

I agree that there is no other article with the same title. However, if there is another "Suffolk County Police Department" in existence then it might cause confusion, whether or not there is an article with that title. Even in the case of a county "Suffolk" in which the local police force is not called the police "department", as in England, it is perfectly easy for someone to think that is the county being referred to. In this situation it seems to me that the disambiguation can do no harm, and may possibly sometimes avoid misunderstanding. JamesBWatson (talk) 07:03, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Yes, there's no other article... yet! But as already explained there's a reasonable likelihood there's another S.C.P.D. somewhere. wp:PLACE#Disambiguation is on point: "In some cases (as with most U.S. towns) it is conventional to add such a tag even when it is not strictly needed for disambiguation purposes" (but follow the link for a fuller explanation). The article on the county itself is Suffolk_County,_New_York and it's entirely logical for titles of articles on its administrative accessories to follow suit. Does Suffok Co., NY have a fire department? If so its article will need a digambuating qualifier, because there appears to be a "Suffolk County Fire Department" in Virginia. Why fuss around with a patchwork of special cases? What's the big deal? (Whether the parenthetical (New York) goes within the title, or at its end, I suspect is specified somewhere e.g. wp:PLACE.) EEng (talk) 14:38, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Reading the above discussion it is clear that there is no consensus for the change. In addition to this, there were two procedural faults in the way the page was renamed: (1) There was admin-shopping. That is to say, the move was requested, rejected by an administrator, and then requested again, in the hope that another administrator would do it. This practice of trying successive admins until you get one who does what you want is not considered acceptable. (2) The article was tagged with {{db-move}}. This tag asserts that the move is non-controversial, but the tag was re-added after the tag had already been declined by an administrator. In this situation it is impossible that the tagging could be thought to be "non-controversial", and so it should not have been used. This issue was discussed at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Law Enforcement, and the disambiguation was added as a result of that discussion. Anyone wishing to revert that change should discuss it first. For all these reasons the article should be moved back to the disambiguated version. JamesBWatson (talk) 07:21, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

This is ridiculous. There are no other articles on Misplaced Pages with the title "Suffolk County Police Department". Therefore, there should be no disambiguation on this page simply because this refers to the Suffolk County of New York.—Ryulong (琉竜) 07:12, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

The red highlight on the map on upper right of article is inaccurate.

The red highlighted map is supposed to be identifying the area of Suffolk County on Long Island, NY. But in reality it's identifying only half of the county. I recommend that the map shown on wikipedia page Suffolk_County,_New_York be used. Blackslax (talk) 17:56, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Categories: