Misplaced Pages

Talk:Deep Space Industries: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:09, 24 January 2013 editGuy Macon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers59,287 edits space and asteroid "ownership", "taking", "claiming": See Space law#The future of space law and Metalaw← Previous edit Revision as of 04:16, 24 January 2013 edit undo75.84.95.229 (talk) Undid revision 534590502 by Guy Macon (talk)Next edit →
Line 12: Line 12:
== space and asteroid "ownership", "taking", "claiming" == == space and asteroid "ownership", "taking", "claiming" ==


seems the UN already has some treaties about outer space. the true property interests of this space business, if any, are not clear. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 01:38, 24 January 2013‎ (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> seems the UN already has some treaties about outer space. the true property interests of this space business, if any, are not clear.

:Nor is it clear whether the UN has jurisdiction. See ''']''' and ''']'''. --] (]) 02:09, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:16, 24 January 2013

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconAstronomy: Astronomical objects Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Misplaced Pages.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconSpaceflight Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Location?

Does anyone know the actual location of Deep Space Industries? It may be that they don't have one, of course; it is now possible to run a completely decentralized company -- at least until you have a factory -- but I would imagine that they must have a mailing address, even if it is just a PO box. --Guy Macon (talk) 12:06, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

The press conference said they would have a presence in the Washington DC area (David Gump) with no shop space, and that the shop space and development lab location was not yet selected, but Houston, Texas or some part of California (LA area or bay area, I don't recall) were the leading candidates for their satellite develop/build/test/facility. Cheers. N2e (talk) 13:20, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

space and asteroid "ownership", "taking", "claiming"

seems the UN already has some treaties about outer space. the true property interests of this space business, if any, are not clear.

Categories: