| Revision as of 18:27, 27 January 2013 editDicklyon (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers476,376 edits →Ban violation continuation← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:03, 27 January 2013 edit undoSandstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators188,206 edits →Arbitration enforcement warning: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
| :I am not the least bit anti-MOS and to suggest that I am borders on slander. I fully respect all of our guidelines and policies. ] (]) 17:49, 27 January 2013 (UTC) | :I am not the least bit anti-MOS and to suggest that I am borders on slander. I fully respect all of our guidelines and policies. ] (]) 17:49, 27 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ::I have requested an enforcement action . ] (]) 18:27, 27 January 2013 (UTC) | ::I have requested an enforcement action . ] (]) 18:27, 27 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == Arbitration enforcement warning == | |||
| {{Ivmbox | |||
| | image = yes | |||
| | The ] has permitted ] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at ]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the English Misplaced Pages ] and ]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], satisfy any ], or follow any ]. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "]" section of the decision page. | |||
| Please familiarise yourself with the information page at ], with the appropriate sections of ], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} --> | |||
| | valign = center | |||
| | ] | |||
| }} | |||
| This relates to the recent . You should take particular care not to edit these policy pages in a way that may be deemed not to reflect community consensus. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 21:03, 27 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:03, 27 January 2013
 Archives | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Welcome!
Hello, Apteva, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! - Darwinek (talk) 08:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Arbitration enforcement
Per Noetica's request on my talkpage, I have filed an Arbitration enforcement request to determine if your edit to WP:AT violates the discretionary sanctions on that article. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 11:51, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Too many examples in WP:COMMONNAME
Thanks for the link... what I see there is the beginning of a discussion that quickly got sidetracked into a long discussion about hyphens and dashes and the MOS. In other words, there was no consensus reached on shortening the list.
I don't really mind the idea of shortening it... but let's get an uncluttered consensus, and some discussion on which examples should stay and which should be removed. I'll start a new talk page discussion. Blueboar (talk) 13:08, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- Per WP:BRD I will bring it up again, but there is no such thing as not being able to walk and chew gum at the same time. The proposal was clear, and there was no opposition, so it was implemented. Apteva (talk) 01:24, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Village pump discussion close
I've undone this extremely bold close, which you neglected to either sign or accompany with an edit summary. In future, if you're going to go around clerking heated threads, at least do others the courtesy of identifying both who is doing the closing and why. Not that it would have made this particular close, eleven whole minutes from the last comment, any more appropriate. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 15:56, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- You are more of a glutten for punishment that I am. That discussion was long over and had just degenerated into a shouting match that had nothing to do with the topic of the thread. But I have no objections to your revert. Apteva (talk) 01:26, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Ban violation continuation
I would have thought that after User:Seraphimblade's clarification of your ban on 10 Jan here, you would not continue your anti-MOS campaign at WT:TITLE as you did here. Dicklyon (talk) 17:44, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
- I am not the least bit anti-MOS and to suggest that I am borders on slander. I fully respect all of our guidelines and policies. Apteva (talk) 17:49, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
- I have requested an enforcement action here. Dicklyon (talk) 18:27, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Arbitration enforcement warning
File:YesThe Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the English Misplaced Pages Manual of Style and article titles policy. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.
This relates to the recent AE request concerning you. You should take particular care not to edit these policy pages in a way that may be deemed not to reflect community consensus. Sandstein 21:03, 27 January 2013 (UTC)