Revision as of 20:35, 16 May 2006 editKhoikhoi (talk | contribs)71,605 edits note← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:10, 17 May 2006 edit undoMelca (talk | contribs)278 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
:Note what Lutherian said : "''This is a true testament to the racist nature of the Armenian psyche! Weems was not mistaken to call them a nation of terrorists!''". —<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">]</span> 20:35, 16 May 2006 (UTC) | :Note what Lutherian said : "''This is a true testament to the racist nature of the Armenian psyche! Weems was not mistaken to call them a nation of terrorists!''". —<span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">]</span> 20:35, 16 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
=={{User|Pantherarosa}}== | |||
This user has recently made several personal attacks at the ] talk page . He has called editors for ''"ignorami and wannabes"'' and assumes they ''"have very limited education and whose mental capacity simply does not suffice for putting well researched data into context for an encyclopedia"''. I have given him a warning but this is not the first time he has been warned about personal attacks | |||
. He just simply deletes and ignores them. --- ] 09:10, 17 May 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:10, 17 May 2006
This is a failed proposal. Consensus for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want to revive discussion, please use the talk page or initiate a thread at the village pump. |
This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
ShortcutThis page is intended to get attention quickly when dealing with personal attacks. It is not intended to serve as a form of mediation or a type of RFC. Only Personal attacks are dealt with on this page, on their own merits in accordance with Misplaced Pages's No Personal Attacks policy
For editors who want a personal attack situation reviewed:
For users handling assistance requests:
Please consider adding this page to your watchlist to make life easier for non-administrator RC-patrollers. |
User:213.84.217.138
As can be seen in the diff.The person makes a clear personal attack: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk%3ARex_Germanus&diff=53558013&oldid=53514082
>>JIJ BENT ECHT EEN KANKERMONGOOL + wat kom je met domme beschuldigingen van shit die ik niet eens heb gedaan kanker idioot <<
English Translation;
"YOU ARE TRULY A FUCKING IDIOT + why do you accuse me of 'shit' that I did not do fucking idiot."
In other words the vandal denies that he or she vandalised the Dutch cuisine article. The diff proves otherwise; http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Dutch_cuisine&diff=38070549&oldid=37075099 The user adds,with what is supposed to look like slang, a sentence saying that a particular Dutch sausage is also called a "bears dick" ... which is ridiculous. Rex Germanus Tesi samanunga is edele unde scona 19:46, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Guettarda (talk · contribs), Bhouston (talk · contribs), CSTAR (talk · contribs), User-multi error: "csloat" is not a valid project or language code (help).,
On Talk:Juan Cole, several editors have endorsed a statement which constituted a serious personal attacks against three users. Two of the endorsers withdrew their endorsement to part, but not all, of this statement, after its nature as a personal attack was pointed out to them. The other editors did not. Their endorsement of this statement is in itself a personal attack:
At least one of the editors involved on the page, Isarig, seems to have no regard for policy, having violated the WP:3RR and WP:NPA in the last few days. He seems unwilling to abide by policy.
Elizmr with Armon's help are very good at fighting off criticism -- mostly through persistence and treating others unfairly.
Endorsers:
- Guettarda
- Ben Houston
- CSTAR 16:05, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
- csloat 16:09, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
- KillerChihuahua 16:11, 11 May 2006 (UTC) modified to clarify first para only endorsed. KillerChihuahua 23:10, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
- bcasterline t 16:14, 11 May 2006 (UTC) I'm also more interested in the first paragraph. bcasterline t 23:37, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
- •Jim62sch• 00:40, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
- The endorsement of this statement by csloat is ironic because he had been guilty of not following Misplaced Pages guidelines WP:AGF and WP:NPA himself in the editing of this particular page (abstracted in ). Similarly, another endorser, Guettarda, soon after endorsing this statement made direct personal attacks against Elizmr (abstracted in ), and Ben Houston had made attacks against Elizmr on the talk page of another article which were felt by the consensus of editors there not to have any basis (abstracted in ).
- User:CSTAR’s endorsement of the statement of Elizmr’s unfairness is especially ironic, because he and User:Elizmr had been engaging in civil and seemingly productive interchanges (abstracted in ).
- User:CSTAR’s endorsement of the statement singling out User:Isarig’s particular violations of policies are also ironic. Cstar had taken administrative action against Isarig in what Isaring had stated was an unbalanced way, and CSTAR not answered Isarig’s notes concerning this (abstracted in).
- To be fair, personal attacks and assumptions of poor faith by User:Elizmr, User:Armon, and User:Isarig are collected here , as are those of User:LeeHunter (abstracted in) an editor on the page not characterized as obstructing progress on the page by the endorsers of the above statement, and sharing a POV with the signers of the above statement. Elizmr 01:21, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
86.134.83.214 (talk · contribs)
stream of personal abuse on talk:Quizzing.co.uk . I added a note on the user's talk page - responded with a stream of abuse at me. (I have absolutely nothing to do with the issue!) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ian Dalziel (talk • contribs) .
- A quick look didn't turn up any personal attacks.. can you provide diffs? --Ryan Delaney 07:01, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
- Several sections have already been removed by Sam Blanning - e.g.
- There's a new crop on there now from User:172.203.64.89 , a possible sockpuppet - including legal threats this time. -- Ian Dalziel 15:09, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
- A quick look didn't turn up any personal attacks.. can you provide diffs? --Ryan Delaney 07:01, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
- this diff definately shows 86.134.83.214 to be making personal attacks. Paul Cyr 05:51, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
Trollwatcher (talk · contribs) and 64.105.124.26 (talk · contribs)
(a banned user) is posting personal attacks about an admin on his user talk page. He is currently not logged in and is using the IP given. I have warned him (not using the templates as I didn't know where to find them until I found this page) but he is annoyed by my reverts so could an admin leave a post to confirm this is ok. Thanks Sophia 19:00, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
- User has restored the material AGAIN! Help! Sophia 23:05, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Pansophia (talk · contribs)
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Kaiser_Permanente&curid=477362&diff=53254033&oldid=53253341 etcetera. 3 warnings. Set a bad example I think. Midgley 03:26, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- The problem is actually Midgley. See this complaint. Also see my talk page - someone already looked into this. --Pansophia 03:49, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- Actually that reference is an RFC on someone else. Nobody has "looked into this" although others have commented to various effects. Pansophia is currently blocked for violating 3RR, but that is separate from this except to the extent that a recurring pattern of baheviour affecting me and others is for that user to substitute attacks on other editors for discussion. I suspect the user was lead astray by the troll to which that RFC relates. Midgley 13:32, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- The example cited by Midgley is not a personal attack, but a statement of fact. Midgley should rather provide specific examples than write "etcetera" if he thinks this is a problem. --Leifern 10:45, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Philwelch (talk · contribs)
- User:Philwelch called me a tempermental child.
Signed: Travb 13:11, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, he said you were acting like a temperamental child. Whether or not the characterization was accurate, that is a small but significant difference. I do not see a personal attack here, at least not one egrecious enough to warrant intervention.
- In any case, other aspects of this dispute are already being discussed elsewhere, and I see no reason to start a redundant discussion here. I'd suggest both of you try not to step on each other's toes for a while, and try to remember that in online communication it's quite easy to misinterpret another person's remarks. The way to keep such misunderstandings from escalating into pointless flamewars is to assume good faith, even when it seems hard to do so, and to generally try to maintain a thick skin and a calm attitude. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 16:57, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Lutherian (talk · contribs)
IP address: 85.0.202.5 He has been warned numerous times. Here he insults user Moby Dick: , I also consider calling me a racist a personal attack as well. See: (called user Fadix "disgusting" for example) or --Eupator 19:41, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- Also an attack on THOTH (talk • contribs) : here and again attacks Eupator (talk • contribs) : here. Eupator's edit summary (sockpuppet of Lutherian) was, in fact, admitted by Lutherian (talk • contribs) here. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:00, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Eupator (talk · contribs)
This user has frequently been making condescending, insluting and racist remarks and falsly accuses me of sockpuppetting when in fact I simply forgot to sign in! A prime example is the following that he posted onto my talk page : "I'm not sure if English is your first language or whether you have cognitive issues but the meer suggestion that a new user such as yourself that jumps into controversial topics might perhaps be a sockpuppet is not only not a personal attack but a daily occurance on wikipedia. Fear not, this is not turkey or mongolia. You are innocent until proven otherwise.--Eupator 15:57, 28 March 2006 (UTC)" and another personal attack posted today on the talk page of Armenian Legion: "That bullcrap was merely copy pasted from already discredited propaganda websites. The scoundrel didn't even bother to paraphrase that baloney.--Eupator 17:13, 16 May 2006 (UTC)" and another "So Lucifer, you mean to tell me that in this freedom of speech paradise anyone can go and burn the turkish flag in ankara like we can do here in the US with our flag? Can the average Joe deface an image of your God ataturk like we can do in Europe or the States with our leaders images and whatnot? Go feed your crap to someone else troll and enough of this irrelevant spamming. This is not a discussion forum.--Eupator 18:46, 16 May 2006 (UTC)"
Furthermore I did not insult anyone by the name of Moby Dick. Calling moby prick someone who calls himself moby penis is hardly insulting! Lutherian 19:51, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- Note what Lutherian said here: "This is a true testament to the racist nature of the Armenian psyche! Weems was not mistaken to call them a nation of terrorists!". —Khoikhoi 20:35, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Pantherarosa (talk · contribs)
This user has recently made several personal attacks at the Mohammed Mossadegh talk page . He has called editors for "ignorami and wannabes" and assumes they "have very limited education and whose mental capacity simply does not suffice for putting well researched data into context for an encyclopedia". I have given him a warning but this is not the first time he has been warned about personal attacks . He just simply deletes and ignores them. --- Melca 09:10, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Categories: