| Revision as of 23:29, 13 February 2013 editTamzin (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators68,778 edits →Commenting on closed AfDs: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:38, 13 February 2013 edit undo3abos (talk | contribs)337 edits →Commenting on closed AfDsNext edit → | ||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
| Hi, 3abos. Per ] policy, you may not comment on an AfD once the discussion has concluded. If you think that there were procedural errors in the discussion, and think the conclusion should be reversed, you're welcome to file at ], but I'll warn you right now that such a request would be ''very'' unlikely to be successful. Additionally, your comments concern be somewhat, as they border on ]/]-pushing. Repeated attempts to promote certain biases in Misplaced Pages often lead to users being blocked for ] and ].''' — <u>]]</u>'''] 23:29, 13 February 2013 (UTC) | Hi, 3abos. Per ] policy, you may not comment on an AfD once the discussion has concluded. If you think that there were procedural errors in the discussion, and think the conclusion should be reversed, you're welcome to file at ], but I'll warn you right now that such a request would be ''very'' unlikely to be successful. Additionally, your comments concern be somewhat, as they border on ]/]-pushing. Repeated attempts to promote certain biases in Misplaced Pages often lead to users being blocked for ] and ].''' — <u>]]</u>'''] 23:29, 13 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :I do not appreciate your bias on here. please stop harassing me, i do not appreciate your heterophobic nature. ] (]) 23:38, 13 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:38, 13 February 2013
February 2013
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Heterophobia, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Dawn Bard (talk) 00:17, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Misplaced Pages articles, as you did to Heterophobia. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Josh3580talk/hist 00:28, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for helping to keep Misplaced Pages growing! About your edits to the Heterophobia page... they seemed like WP:NPOV violations to me, as there is a definite political slant to the content you added. It was mostly argumentative and not very informative. Also, I don't understand why any additional information couldn't be added to the existing subsection of the Homophobia article, instead of recreating this previously discussed and deleted article, without any prior discussion with the community.Josh3580talk/hist 00:38, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- I have once again reverted your edits. You are listing sources, but while they all describe events, they don't arrive at the conclusions outlined in your article body. Drawing your own conclusions from verifiable sources is still considered Original Research, which is not appropriate for an encyclopedia.Josh3580talk/hist 00:46, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- do not revert, there is a discussion taking place at Misplaced Pages:No original research/Noticeboard3abos (talk) 00:49, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- I have once again reverted your edits. You are listing sources, but while they all describe events, they don't arrive at the conclusions outlined in your article body. Drawing your own conclusions from verifiable sources is still considered Original Research, which is not appropriate for an encyclopedia.Josh3580talk/hist 00:46, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Heterophobia with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Eyesnore (pending changes) 00:32, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Notice of No Original Research Noticeboard discussion
Hello, 3abos. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion is taking place at Misplaced Pages:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dawn Bard (talk) 00:40, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you violate Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Heterophobia. Josh3580talk/hist 00:58, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Heterophobia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dawn Bard (talk) 00:59, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- reverting Heterophobia to Homophobia is a violation of neutrality. Please proceed to the article's talk page to discuss 3abos (talk) 01:03, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Josh3580talk/hist 01:39, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Heterophobia#Treatment
I had to revert because of a copyright violation (a simple technicality), but that is a great example of a good WP:NPOV source! Try to paraphrase the information without adding opinion, and you've got it! Thank you so much for working with us on this... It's a touchy subject, and we have to be careful.Josh3580talk/hist 06:22, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Ignatius Joseph III Yonan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Mor
- Syriac Catholic Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Anamnesis
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Heterophobia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heterophobia is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Heterophobia (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — PinkAmpers& 13:09, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Dawn Bard (talk) 13:15, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 13:51, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Commenting on closed AfDs
Hi, 3abos. Per WP:AFD policy, you may not comment on an AfD once the discussion has concluded. If you think that there were procedural errors in the discussion, and think the conclusion should be reversed, you're welcome to file at Deletion review, but I'll warn you right now that such a request would be very unlikely to be successful. Additionally, your comments concern be somewhat, as they border on soapboxing/POV-pushing. Repeated attempts to promote certain biases in Misplaced Pages often lead to users being blocked for tendentious editing and not being here to build an encyclopedia. — PinkAmpers& 23:29, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
- I do not appreciate your bias on here. please stop harassing me, i do not appreciate your heterophobic nature. 3abos (talk) 23:38, 13 February 2013 (UTC)