| Revision as of 16:40, 14 February 2013 editPigsonthewing (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors266,108 editsm '← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:55, 14 February 2013 edit undoGiano (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users20,173 edits →Template:Hidden content dispute: Removing a disruptive edit by a troll who is losing a debate elsewhere.Next edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| --> | --> | ||
| ==== ] ==== | |||
| :{{Tfd links|Hidden content dispute}} | |||
| Redundant to {{tl|Collapse top}}. Only used on two talk pages. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 16:37, 14 February 2013 (UTC) <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 16:37, 14 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==== ] ==== | ==== ] ==== | ||
| :{{Tfd links|Vndb}} | :{{Tfd links|Vndb}} | ||
Revision as of 16:55, 14 February 2013
| < February 13 | February 15 > |
|---|
February 14
Template:Vndb
- Template:Vndb (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
The VNDB is editable just like Misplaced Pages. This template is wholly unnecessary. I have also noticed that the website is being used as references (two are used on 11eyes: Tsumi to Batsu to Aganai no Shōjo). A massive revision on anime articles is recommended. JC · Xbox · Talk · Contributions 01:31, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep - This is a valid template to be used for external links, like {{GameFAQs}} and the {{IMDb}} templates. If it's used as a reference and it's not a reliable source... well that's hardly a problem that should be solved at TfD. Treat it like any other unreliable source used as a reference. :) ·Salvidrim!· ✉ 06:17, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: Used for ELs, and not referencing. We don't delete imdb and youtube templates for this reason either. If people are misusing the template, fix the issue on the relevant page. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 07:18, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- While it's true that this is symptomatic of the generally egregious quality of our coverage of this subject, so long as this is being used as an extlink and not a reference it's probably not going to help anything by deleting it. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:54, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I have to agree to keep. If it is being used as a reference that is indeed a problem but since it is clearly marked as Category:External link templates, it should not be deleted as it has use there. 50.53.15.59 (talk) 12:57, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with the other keep votes. It's a valid EL template similar to Template:ANN and the others listed by Salvidrim. If it's being used improperly, the solution is education, not deletion.--Atlantima (talk) 13:47, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep – This is an external link template so there's no real reason to delete it as it is not used for RSing just formatting ELs. Cabe6403 15:40, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep per all of the above. Templating multiple external links to the same site helps with monitoring, and in cases where their URL structure changes. Snowball? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:39, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Template:USA Today All-Joe Team
Virtually a navbox with only links to redlinks besides the main page. Until at least a few of them get created, there'd be no point in having this. ZappaOMati 00:46, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. If articles can't be created for the red-linked items in four years, it's probably not going to happen (if it does, recreate it at such time). Transcluded in only one article. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars 01:25, 14 February 2013 (UTC)