Misplaced Pages

User talk:RichardMalter: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:54, 18 May 2006 editRichardMalter (talk | contribs)193 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 16:29, 18 May 2006 edit undoSlimVirgin (talk | contribs)172,064 edits 24 hoursNext edit →
Line 15: Line 15:


OK. Why dont you help stopping a group of people that have a declared bias from deleting simple facts, and trying to manipulate this page to express their bias? If you actually read through what is happening - you will see what I mean.--] 13:54, 18 May 2006 (UTC) OK. Why dont you help stopping a group of people that have a declared bias from deleting simple facts, and trying to manipulate this page to express their bias? If you actually read through what is happening - you will see what I mean.--] 13:54, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

:3RR does not depend on content. Because you ignored the warning and reverted again, you've been blocked for 24 hours. Please use the time to review our editing policies. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 16:29, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:29, 18 May 2006

Bi-Digital O-Ring Test

Please stop blanking this article. This is not considered an appropriate thing to do in Misplaced Pages. --Philosophus 03:58, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

ReplyTaking out non-neutral information is entirely consistant. Adding or correcting information is the same. Do you know of the phrase 'the pot calling the kettle black'? This is what is happening with this discussion.

WP:3RR

Please note that wikipedia policy (WP:3RR) prohibits the reversion of an edit more than three times in 24 hours. I should have warned you of this earlier, but as you told me to read Misplaced Pages's rules, I thought that you had done so yourself. You can probably avoid punishment be self-reverting your edits, as per WP:3RR. Sorry --Philosophus 08:21, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

see Vandalism. Please also stop reverting my edits. It is a two sided, not, one sides process.--RichardMalter 08:27, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

3RR warning

Hi Richard, you've been reported for a 3RR violation at Bi-Digital O-Ring Test. Because you're new, I'm leaving this warning rather than blocking you, but please note that if you violate it again, you're likely to be blocked without warning. Please read the policy carefully at WP:3RR. Also, please don't accuse other editors of vandalism. Cheers, SlimVirgin 09:56, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

OK. Why dont you help stopping a group of people that have a declared bias from deleting simple facts, and trying to manipulate this page to express their bias? If you actually read through what is happening - you will see what I mean.--RichardMalter 13:54, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

3RR does not depend on content. Because you ignored the warning and reverted again, you've been blocked for 24 hours. Please use the time to review our editing policies. SlimVirgin 16:29, 18 May 2006 (UTC)