| Revision as of 11:46, 20 May 2006 editArbustoo (talk | contribs)12,546 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:20, 20 May 2006 edit undoVivaldi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers5,085 edits →Giving you a chance to apologize and revert your false statementNext edit → | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
| Thus, I can conclude you lied in your edit summary accusing me of vanadalism to remove material or you made a mistake. ] 11:41, 20 May 2006 (UTC) | Thus, I can conclude you lied in your edit summary accusing me of vanadalism to remove material or you made a mistake. ] 11:41, 20 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
| : Don't play stupid Arbustoo. You removed the man's position as Chief of Police detectives from the article. You did so because you find it inconvenient to your own biased view and your desire to defame Hyles and FCBH at all costs, no matter what the evidence shows. Both the FBI and the head of the police said that Hyles was not under investigation in regards to the unfounded allegations. So why is it part of an encyclopedia article? ] (]) 19:20, 20 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:20, 20 May 2006
 Archives |
|---|
First Baptist Church of Hammond
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. . I suggest that rather than edit-warring you try the steps listed in WP:DR. Just zis Guy you know? 08:35, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Each of the changes I made and the reasons for them are fully hashed out on the talk page and in the edit summaries. Vivaldi (talk) 15:16, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Personal Attack. your notification
Your statement: "Your intent is to try to fool people " is a personal attack. It appears at and is directed at me. Please read Misplaced Pages:No_personal_attacks, it spells out how to make comments on discussion pages, what a personal attack is and how to avoid getting involved with personal attacks. This is your first instance in some weeks and I'm therefore, giving you the benifit of the doubt rather than resorting to WP:PAIN. Please stop the personal attacks, Vivaldi. Terryeo 00:19, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- Terryeo. You intent is to try to fool people. It isn't a personal attack, it is a statement of fact. You engage in willful deceit to further your POV. Vivaldi (talk) 01:52, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
Your RfC
You are invited to your rfc, follow the link: Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Vivaldi. Arbusto 01:12, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- I hope you attract some good editors to the Jack Hyles related articles. Vivaldi (talk) 01:53, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
Giving you a chance to apologize and revert your false statement
Your recent edit, I mean revert, removed press criticism liking Hyles to Jim Jones. Yet, your edit summary claimed, "Version by Arbustoo is not as good. Why would you take out the fact that the Chief of Police Detectives said there was no investigation Arbustoo? Isn't that important?" However, my version notes "Capt. Bill Conner was quoted in the Tribune saying that, "There is no investigation of the First Baptist Church of Hammond or Jack Hyles".
Thus, I can conclude you lied in your edit summary accusing me of vanadalism to remove material or you made a mistake. Arbusto 11:41, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- Don't play stupid Arbustoo. You removed the man's position as Chief of Police detectives from the article. You did so because you find it inconvenient to your own biased view and your desire to defame Hyles and FCBH at all costs, no matter what the evidence shows. Both the FBI and the head of the police said that Hyles was not under investigation in regards to the unfounded allegations. So why is it part of an encyclopedia article? Vivaldi (talk) 19:20, 20 May 2006 (UTC)