Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 21:34, 8 March 2013

Cooperating

So things are ok now? MezzoMezzo (talk) 12:20, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Hey man, I replied on my talk page for now, but in the future could you post messages like this on the talk page for the article? If the other user isn't paying attention, you could just message them on their talk page mentioning that there is a discussion on such-and-such talk page. I didn't know what you were talking about at first so it took me a minute to figure it out. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:26, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

i thought it wouldnt be a problem since you post on my talk page. Baboon43 (talk)

It's not a problem, what I'm saying is you can post it on the talk page for that article and then post on my talk page to remind me. When you started off the bat like that, I was immediately sure what you were talking about because I edited a lot of articles yesterday. It's not a big deal, just a suggestion. Also, more than just you and I might be interested in the discussion, hence the benefit of posting it on the talk page for the relevant article. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:56, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Hey, I opened a discussion on the talk page for the Albani article. Bring whatever sources you can and let's work out a new consensus there. As it is, the article has very few reliable sources so anything we can bring will help. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:23, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

actually i would have opened a discussion on the talk page sooner if i intended on dwelling on the albani issue.my intention was to put my point across your edit on his article that is all..i would prefer to develop other articles then albanis at the moment but maybe sometime in the future. Baboon43 (talk) 04:31, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Ahbashism campaign

There was a request for further discussion, specifically an RfC on that page. I don't know how comfortable you would be with me acting in the role of Misplaced Pages:Third opinion, or if you'd like to go directly to RfC. But speaking as someone who knows little about the subject from the outside looking in, its a contentious article which could benefit from multiple comments. Think of it this way: if you, McKhan and all others interested can sort out that conflict smoothly, your time will be freed up to move on to other articles and projects. MezzoMezzo (talk) 07:37, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

RFC is fine. Baboon43 (talk) 19:49, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

I'm not trying to stifle you, OK? If I really didn't like you personally, I wouldn't respond to you at all. I think that overall, you're an active editor who has made many good contributions to this site. I'm not your enemy and I don't want to be. Please understand, I'm only trying to mediate because I see the discussion headed in a direction that might end with nobody's views being heard. I'm trying to help you, even if we disagree sometimes. This is why I respond even here on your personal page. Please understand that I say what I say as a respectful editor towards a peer, not as someone who just wants to battle someone else over content. MezzoMezzo (talk) 09:14, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Assalamoalaikum!There is a discussion going on here and I have been accused of Personal Attacks ,as you have worked on Barelvi Page and have engaged in long discussions your views regarding the behavior of MezzoMezzo is relevant.Thanks. Shabiha (talk) 15:59, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clarkston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Good work

Nice one over on the Deobandi article. I remember initially not knowing what the GEE was when you mentioned it once. Then I found it and started using it on the biographies for some sheikhs, and somebody randomly told me what a Misplaced Pages fork is. Good on you for finding a valid source for the same material though. See. I'm not here to fight you, man. I just want Misplaced Pages to be better, even if I'm wrong sometimes. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:45, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Sufi-Salafi relations

I request you to kindly help me neutralizing Sufi-Salafi relations.Thanks. Shabiha (talk) 10:41, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

thats a large article if i get the time, sure. Baboon43 (talk) 19:56, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Just help me in discussion on its deletion entry page and try to edit initial headings. Shabiha (talk) 18:43, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Doesn't need 2 templates

Can you remove one the two templates? They both say the same thing. Thats my main problem. It makes it unaesthetic and awkward.Sopher99 (talk) 19:27, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

both are separate types of templates. Baboon43 (talk) 19:28, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

"neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved. (March 2013)"

"This article may be unbalanced towards certain viewpoints Please improve the article by adding information on neglected viewpoints, or discuss the issue on the talk page. "

See. I Suggest taking away the top one, as the bottom one talks in specific of undue weight/ungiven weight such as whether or not something should be included in the infobox. Sopher99 (talk) 19:31, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. Much appreciated Sopher99 (talk) 19:58, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Shabiha (talk) 21:34, 8 March 2013 (UTC)