Revision as of 03:19, 21 May 2006

User:ManiF is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

From Soso

I changed Bagrationi link to Bagrationi Dynasty. Please do not change it back.
Soso

Alembic

Which sentences that I added on Alembic, do you disagree on?jidan 13:19, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

No, I think you want just to give me hard time. There are many articles on wiki that don't have reference like these:

• Ahmad ibn Farrokh,
• Al-Abhari,
• Ahmad ibn Farrokh,
• Ahmad Ibn Imad ul-din,
• and many others from the List of Iranian scientists

But you still don't delete them, becasue its not contoversial or were disputed by a user.And I didn't attack you, I attacked what you do. You don't have to note that down to use it against me later, because I will not be editing wiki anymore. Not because of you, but becasue I think my time is MUCH more valuable than this. Khoda Hafez ManiF. jidan 14:07, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Email enabled

Greetings Mani. My email's been enabled. Let me know what's up. Cheers. Tombseye 04:05, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Timothy's paragraph,

Okay I'll remove that one too. Don't you think the source seem kinda suspect?- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 13:53, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Wait can you point me to the section that it is in?- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 13:55, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

K, is their anything else I missed?- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 14:03, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Design me one of tose user tags

Make one saying this user dreams of the reunification of Azarbaijan with Iran. Plus look at the Azari-related articles. Azaris are ethnic Iranians and no ground should be given o the issue. I have provided countless verification,but what really bothers me is user:Grandmasters propaganda campaing to erase the term Azari and Azarbaijan with Azeri and Azerbaijan. Thanks 72.57.230.179

Re:Simon Wiesenthal Center

Rabbi Hier is referring to an editorial by Amir Taheri, which is a different article from the one used as a source. In addition, Rabbi Hier is citing National Post editorial to refer to the developing consensus, not the law itself. Pecher 20:57, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

What's your source for the claim that National Post is investigating the issue and may retract the story? Again, I cannot see any indication that Simon Wiesenthal Center based its lettter on a National Post's editorial. Pecher 21:09, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Yo

Read Email

The Iranian buissiness

OK. I wasn't really checking for other sources @ the time, just trying to organized what I saw as a mess already there, so I missed that. If it hasn't been already, I'll integrate that into it. Thanx. 68.39.174.238 01:34, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Revised. Look any better? I'm still going to try and report on the timeline of the reporting. 68.39.174.238 01:43, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Hmm, the original story is back again! 68.39.174.238 01:53, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

The link at the bottom of the articel on the "law" works, assuming that's the same one. Also, I've tried to make sure everything in the intro has the same tense. 68.39.174.238 02:00, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

I never saw the original articel, so you'll have to look at the link that works and see if its the same as the old one that's gone now. 68.39.174.238 02:42, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Salam

Salam!

Omidvaram ke halet khoob basheh. ManiF, man yek editore mosalmoon hastam ke yek modate ziyadiyeh ke tooye wikipedia fa'al boodam. Man modate ziyadi rooye maghaleye Criticism of Islam kar kardam. Mitoonam begam ke 75% ghesmathayi ke javab midan be criticism ha rou man neveshtam. Valy kam kam mikham az wikipedia bekesham kenar, choon kheyly vaghtamoo migireh. Doost dashtam nazdikeh raftanam "Zora" rou ke be nazaram etela'atesh ziyadeh va ehsasate zedde islamish az taghriban aksareh editorhaye non-muslim digeh kamtare rou be ounvane "Administrator" kandida konam. ManiF, man tooye wikipedia kheyli ba editor haye mokhtalef dar oftadam. Masalan "Dhimmi" rou bebin. Dahanam saf shodeh ba bazi az editor ha mesle pecher. Be nazareh man Zora kheyli nesbate be baghiyeh maghool tareh(Tooye moghayese migam). Zora hazer nist ghabool koneh ke candida besheh. Migeh ke vaseye khodesh doshman ziyad doroost kardeh. Goftesh ke ba shoma va Zereshk kheyli conflict dashteh. Hala man yek darkhast az shoma daram. Aya hich conditioni hast ke tahteh oun shoma ba Administrator zora mokhalefat nakoni? Masalan inkeh Zora az Administrator boodanesh tooye yek seri maghaleha estefadeh nakoneh ya ... Faghat mikhastam bedoonam ke sadetarin sharti ke doost dari bezari ke ba Administrator Zora mokhalefat nakoni chiyeh. Vaseye har chizi rahi hast, rahe in chiyeh? Kheyli mamnoon. --Aminz 03:19, 21 May 2006 (UTC)