Misplaced Pages

Talk:Mucoid cap: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:21, 20 May 2006 editTearlach (talk | contribs)6,734 edits Re reversion← Previous edit Revision as of 05:43, 21 May 2006 edit undo72.224.168.161 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Misplaced Pages's ''verifiability'', ''no original research'' and ''reliable sources'' guidelines state the following:
==Re reversion==
I've reverted because this needs discussion and consensus. This anonymous rewrite appears to be an entirely biased revision aimed at promoting the existence of mucoid plaque, padding the references with promotional links, and minimising the evidence against its existence.


"Information on Misplaced Pages must be reliable. Facts, viewpoints, theories, and arguments may only be included in articles if they have already been published by reliable and reputable sources. Articles should cite these sources whenever possible. Any unsourced material may be challenged and removed."
A particular inaccuracy was the conflation of the observed reality that the bowel produces a thin layer of mucus (like other ]s) with the claims for a vastly thicker layer of mucoid plaque. ] 09:21, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

"attribute the views to their adherents."

"Keep in mind that many articles are about characterizing the various factions in a dispute. This means that you will be looking for reliable published reports of people's opinions. . .that a certain person or group holds a certain opinion is a fact, and it may be included in Misplaced Pages if it can be verified; that is, if you can cite a good source showing that the person or group holds the opinion.

"self-published books, personal websites, and blogs are largely not acceptable as sources."

Revision as of 05:43, 21 May 2006

Misplaced Pages's verifiability, no original research and reliable sources guidelines state the following:

"Information on Misplaced Pages must be reliable. Facts, viewpoints, theories, and arguments may only be included in articles if they have already been published by reliable and reputable sources. Articles should cite these sources whenever possible. Any unsourced material may be challenged and removed."

"attribute the views to their adherents."

"Keep in mind that many articles are about characterizing the various factions in a dispute. This means that you will be looking for reliable published reports of people's opinions. . .that a certain person or group holds a certain opinion is a fact, and it may be included in Misplaced Pages if it can be verified; that is, if you can cite a good source showing that the person or group holds the opinion.

"self-published books, personal websites, and blogs are largely not acceptable as sources."