| Revision as of 22:53, 10 March 2013 editSarekOfVulcan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators51,714 edits Creating deletion discussion page for National Register Information System. (TW) | Revision as of 23:02, 10 March 2013 edit undoDoncram (talk | contribs)203,830 edits →National Register Information System: speedy keepNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| :({{Find sources|National Register Information System}}) | :({{Find sources|National Register Information System}}) | ||
| No evidence is given in the article that the NRIS is notable apart from the ]. The only reference is a link to the database itself. ] 22:53, 10 March 2013 (UTC) | No evidence is given in the article that the NRIS is notable apart from the ]. The only reference is a link to the database itself. ] 22:53, 10 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
| '''Speedy Keep'''. It's a new article with several references already. And there are about 40,000 or more references in Misplaced Pages itself, and many more elsewhere, to the NRIS database. I am sorry to note that the deleting nominator is a named party along with myself, in ongoing Misplaced Pages arbitration. I personally consider this nomination to be biased and to represent poor judgement by an involved party in arbitration. And, I don't see reference to any deletion criteria at all, much less any valid reason, in the deletion nomination. --]]] 23:02, 10 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:02, 10 March 2013
National Register Information System
- National Register Information System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence is given in the article that the NRIS is notable apart from the National Register of Historic Places. The only reference is a link to the database itself. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:53, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Speedy Keep. It's a new article with several references already. And there are about 40,000 or more references in Misplaced Pages itself, and many more elsewhere, to the NRIS database. I am sorry to note that the deleting nominator is a named party along with myself, in ongoing Misplaced Pages arbitration. I personally consider this nomination to be biased and to represent poor judgement by an involved party in arbitration. And, I don't see reference to any deletion criteria at all, much less any valid reason, in the deletion nomination. --doncram 23:02, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Categories: