| Revision as of 17:34, 23 April 2012 editRexxS (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers43,075 edits I've amended the comment - feel free to discuss← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:32, 22 March 2013 edit undoGFHandel (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers12,534 edits →Infobox discussion at JS Bach: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| The claim above that the 17 December 2011 TfD "''decision was later reversed by deleting admin because of lack of notification of interested parties and discussion''" is a lie (no diffs can be provided to substantiate it). The closing admin made no such judgement, nor action; they only recreated the template in userspace; and it was only then recreated in template-space by another editor. The bogus comment should be removed. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 19:20, 22 April 2012 (UTC) | The claim above that the 17 December 2011 TfD "''decision was later reversed by deleting admin because of lack of notification of interested parties and discussion''" is a lie (no diffs can be provided to substantiate it). The closing admin made no such judgement, nor action; they only recreated the template in userspace; and it was only then recreated in template-space by another editor. The bogus comment should be removed. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 19:20, 22 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
| : The discussion between Ravpapa and Plastikspork (the closing admin) can be found on {{oldid|User talk:Plastikspork#Template:Infobox classical composer|488827639|Plastikspork's talk page}}. Although Andy expresses himself rather too strongly, I would agree with him that the discussion is mischaracterised in the {{tl|Tfd end}} comment. I have therefore amended it to something that I feel is rather more accurate - and hopefully neutral. Please feel free to discuss here if you can find a more appropriate comment. --] (]) 17:34, 23 April 2012 (UTC) | : The discussion between Ravpapa and Plastikspork (the closing admin) can be found on {{oldid|User talk:Plastikspork#Template:Infobox classical composer|488827639|Plastikspork's talk page}}. Although Andy expresses himself rather too strongly, I would agree with him that the discussion is mischaracterised in the {{tl|Tfd end}} comment. I have therefore amended it to something that I feel is rather more accurate - and hopefully neutral. Please feel free to discuss here if you can find a more appropriate comment. --] (]) 17:34, 23 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == Infobox discussion at JS Bach == | |||
| There is currently a ] about using an Infobox on the JS Bach article. Although on a composer-specific page, the discussion is mentioning other composers and general issues to do with infoboxes (which could be helped with input from knowledgeable editors). ] ] 04:32, 22 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:32, 22 March 2013
 | This template was considered for deletion on 2011 December 17. The result of the discussion was "delete, but template was later userfied by the closing admin". |
| This page was nominated at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion on 22 March 2012. The result of the discussion was "Keep" (as redirect to {{Infobox person}}). |
| This template was considered for deletion on 2012 April 20. The result of the discussion was "speedy keep". |
Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because this template is the result of extensive discussion at the classical composers project. It was deleted on the sly, without alerting anyone on the project of the intent to delete it. In accordance with Misplaced Pages policy, I consulted with the deleting admin, User:Plastikspork, who restored it to my userspace, and suggested that I restore it pending further discussion at the project. That discussion has taken place, and I have restored it.
You can read the discussions regarding this template at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Composers.
--Ravpapa (talk) 20:19, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
- Moments later: Please remove the speedy deletion template quickly, as it now shows up on all pages using the template.Thank you, --Ravpapa (talk) 20:46, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Dishonest comment in TfD summary box
The claim above that the 17 December 2011 TfD "decision was later reversed by deleting admin because of lack of notification of interested parties and discussion" is a lie (no diffs can be provided to substantiate it). The closing admin made no such judgement, nor action; they only recreated the template in userspace; and it was only then recreated in template-space by another editor. The bogus comment should be removed. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:20, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
- The discussion between Ravpapa and Plastikspork (the closing admin) can be found on Plastikspork's talk page. Although Andy expresses himself rather too strongly, I would agree with him that the discussion is mischaracterised in the {{Tfd end}} comment. I have therefore amended it to something that I feel is rather more accurate - and hopefully neutral. Please feel free to discuss here if you can find a more appropriate comment. --RexxS (talk) 17:34, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Infobox discussion at JS Bach
There is currently a discussion about using an Infobox on the JS Bach article. Although on a composer-specific page, the discussion is mentioning other composers and general issues to do with infoboxes (which could be helped with input from knowledgeable editors). GFHandel ♬ 04:32, 22 March 2013 (UTC)