| Revision as of 16:59, 29 March 2013 editPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers285,860 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:19, 29 March 2013 edit undoVolunteer Marek (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers94,084 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| *'''Keep'''. Appears to be more than adequately referenced to meet basic notability requirements. If it's to be argued that the sources used are unreliable, then it should be explained ''why'' they are unreliable. --] (]) 14:22, 29 March 2013 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''. Appears to be more than adequately referenced to meet basic notability requirements. If it's to be argued that the sources used are unreliable, then it should be explained ''why'' they are unreliable. --] (]) 14:22, 29 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' - the version restored by Giano is not based on reliable sources. This HAS been explained on talk if someone actually bothered to look. ] is NOT a reliable source, for facts and certainly NOT for BLP related stuff (it's a smear mag/tabloid). The rest is just "random crap found on the internet". Nothing to indicate the subject's notability. Nota bene - even if this is kept (and it's hard to AGF some of these votes) the BLP material sourced to NIE and other junk goes. That's just BLP policy and is not subject to a vote.<span style="color:Blue">]</span><span style="color:Orange">]</span> 17:19, 29 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:19, 29 March 2013
Advice Polack
- Advice Polack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As this stands today, it's a stub with one ref of poor reliability. I tend to be more of an inclusionist when it comes to 'net memes, but at this stage this doesn't look like a keeper. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:47, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable trivia. Mcewan (talk) 08:42, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:57, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:57, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
- Ever heard of that little thing called BLP? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:59, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: There seems to be a perectly adequate and referenced vesion in the history - so I have reverted to that version. . Giano 14:00, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, good deal of references in version as pointed out by Giano (talk · contribs), above. — Cirt (talk) 14:12, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Appears to be more than adequately referenced to meet basic notability requirements. If it's to be argued that the sources used are unreliable, then it should be explained why they are unreliable. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 14:22, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - the version restored by Giano is not based on reliable sources. This HAS been explained on talk if someone actually bothered to look. NIE (weekly magazine) is NOT a reliable source, for facts and certainly NOT for BLP related stuff (it's a smear mag/tabloid). The rest is just "random crap found on the internet". Nothing to indicate the subject's notability. Nota bene - even if this is kept (and it's hard to AGF some of these votes) the BLP material sourced to NIE and other junk goes. That's just BLP policy and is not subject to a vote.Volunteer Marek 17:19, 29 March 2013 (UTC)