Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 19:48, 5 April 2013

• WP:AIV

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
4. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
   • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.

This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.

This page was last updated at 19:08 on 28 December 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.

This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared.

Reports

Bot-reported

• Sherwoodzanetmma (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 15:45, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

  No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. Daniel Case (talk) 18:45, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

• 2603:7000:a5f0:92c0:7119:61f6:565f:7606 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 766 twice in the last 5 minutes (Alt-right labeling, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:45, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings.

• 36.37.193.82 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1321 (LTA 1321, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:53, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

  No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. Daniel Case (talk) 18:47, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

User-reported

• Lacommun1cations (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. Theroadislong (talk) 11:40, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Question: Can you provide a diff to support the claim of spam? All I see is an spa with possibly a COI but not link to a website and to the user name. Alexf 11:49, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Promoting Lymphoma Association, all edits are adding links to their website.Theroadislong (talk) 11:55, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Note: Presumably if Theroadislong has seen promotional editing then it would have been easy for him/her to provide at least one diff, whereas for someone else to start searching from scratch takes much more time and trouble. Nevertheless, I have checked a 50% sample of the user's edits. Many of them are not remotely promotional. Those that were promotional were no doubt made in good faith. The user has made no article edits since being told there is a problem, and has posted on a talk page to discuss the issues involved. This is not the right moment for administrative action against him/her, which will become appropriate only if and when the promotional editing continues after suitable warnings and explanation. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:54, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

I do try and assume good faith, but on every article that the user has edited, they have added the same external link to their own website. I won't revert them again. Theroadislong (talk) 14:28, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

• XXNebraskFanXx (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – vandalism, including 1, 2, 3, 4 – ♥ Solarra ♥ ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 15:54, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. Alexf 16:42, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

• 95.150.51.169 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism, including 1, 2, 3, 4 – RA0808 _contribs 19:02, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

  No vandalism since final warning. Re-report if this user resumes vandalising. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:04, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

• 204.131.75.162 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) All of this user's edits have been vandalism, including repetition of same silly graffiti. E.g., 1, 2, 3, and 4. Czrisher (talk) 19:34, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. I know the IP is static, but this is also quite Stale, too. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:37, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

I want User:Cavarrone and User:The Banner blocked from editing pages: Kidz Bop 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, because they keep making false changes. I'm putting the exclusive songs on the pages, because no one knows about them, but they keep changing it back. I have the songs and I have proof. PLEASE BLOCK these Users from editing these pages.

• Misplaced Pages noticeboards
• Misplaced Pages vandalism
• Administrative backlog