Revision as of 22:04, 8 April 2013 editChed (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users64,984 edits →GAR: re to IRWolfie← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:43, 9 April 2013 edit undoLittleolive oil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers25,079 edits →GAR: sheeshNext edit → | ||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
:IRWolfie, I think you're really pushing the boundaries of good judgement here. This is quickly beginning to look like harassment, and I will not hesitate to block you if it continues. I assume you've read Silk Torks comment at the "request", yes? Olive's "needs", just like her personal life, should not be your concern. — <small><span class="nowrap" style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 22:04, 8 April 2013 (UTC) | :IRWolfie, I think you're really pushing the boundaries of good judgement here. This is quickly beginning to look like harassment, and I will not hesitate to block you if it continues. I assume you've read Silk Torks comment at the "request", yes? Olive's "needs", just like her personal life, should not be your concern. — <small><span class="nowrap" style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 22:04, 8 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
::IRWolfie, In fact an editor mentioned deleting 75% of the content on the JH article. Unless discussed and per the discretionary sanctions this would be a violation. I though it was fair to mention it. (] (]) 00:11, 9 April 2013 (UTC)) | |||
== COI == | == COI == |
Revision as of 00:43, 9 April 2013
WP:RETENTION This editor is willing to lend a helping hand. Just ask.
Archives | ||||||
Index
|
||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present. |
GOCE March drive newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 backlog elimination drive update
Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 Backlog elimination drive! Here's the mid-drive newsletter. Participation: We have had 58 people sign up for this drive so far, which compares favorably with our last drive, and 27 have copy-edited at least one article. If you have signed up but have not yet copy-edited any articles, please consider doing so. Every bit helps! If you haven't signed up yet, it's not too late. Join us! Progress report: Our target of completing the 2010 articles has almost been reached, with only 56 remaining of the 194 we had at the start of the drive. The last ones are always the most difficult, so thank you if you are able to help copy-edit any of the remaining articles. We have reduced the total backlog by 163 articles so far. Special thanks: Special thanks to Stfg, who has been going through the backlog and doing some preliminary vetting of the articles—removing copyright violations, doing initial clean-up, and nominating some for deletion. This work has helped make the drive a more pleasant experience for all our volunteers. Your drive coordinators – Dianna (talk), Stfg (talk), and Dank (talk)To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. |
Please comment on Misplaced Pages:Op Privilege Policy
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Misplaced Pages:Op Privilege Policy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 09:16, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
New User Template
This user is a member of the Wiki Project on Transcendental Meditation. |
Hi, I am notifying all editors who are listed as participants at the Transcendental Meditation project page to let them know they may add this newly created project user template (see image at left) to their user page by adding the following code: {{User WPTranscendental Meditation}} to their page, if they so desire. Thanks! -- — Keithbob • Talk • 17:06, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
GOCE mid-March 2013 newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors March 2013 backlog elimination drive mid-drive newsletter
We are halfway through our March backlog elimination drive. The mid-drive newsletter is now ready for review. – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, BDD, and Miniapolis |
Please comment on Misplaced Pages talk:Dispute resolution noticeboard
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Misplaced Pages talk:Dispute resolution noticeboard. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 10:15, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Barnstar
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
Belated recognition for your dedication to teamwork during the drive to bring John Hagelin to GA status. -- — Keithbob • Talk • 22:27, 1 April 2013 (UTC) |
Thanks so much, Kbob. Yes, many editors worked on that article, definitely a group effort.(olive (talk) 18:23, 2 April 2013 (UTC))
GOCE April 2013 newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors March 2013 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter
We have completed our March backlog elimination drive. The drive wrap-up newsletter is now ready for review. – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, BDD, and Miniapolis |
AE Appeal
Hi Olive. I have now lodged my appeal against my banning. Apparently it could not be heard by Arbcom. Cheers. Rumiton (talk) 11:28, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks Rumiton. I 'd like to comment, so thanks for the notice.(olive (talk) 15:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC))
GAR
Per WP:GAR I am notifying you of a discussion about a re-assement of the article John Hagelin. IRWolfie- (talk) 21:49, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Just a small note, it's generally seen to be in bad taste to drop, in the middle of a civil discussion, that a topic is covered under discretionary sanctions. It just leads to the question of why you felt the need to do it (especially for an article where there the need was felt to add the DS template). IRWolfie- (talk) 21:51, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- IRWolfie, I think you're really pushing the boundaries of good judgement here. This is quickly beginning to look like harassment, and I will not hesitate to block you if it continues. I assume you've read Silk Torks comment at the "request", yes? Olive's "needs", just like her personal life, should not be your concern. — Ched : ? 22:04, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- IRWolfie, In fact an editor mentioned deleting 75% of the content on the JH article. Unless discussed and per the discretionary sanctions this would be a violation. I though it was fair to mention it. (olive (talk) 00:11, 9 April 2013 (UTC))
COI
Can you please confirm or deny whether you work or have a connection to MUM. This question is in connection primarily with your edits to John Hagelin. IRWolfie- (talk) 22:33, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but where I work or don't is no one 's business. I suggest you review the TG arbitration for further information on the implications of pursuing editors based on making COI connections. (olive (talk) 22:42, 5 April 2013 (UTC))
- Since your statements have a chilling effect on my ability to ask you any further questions, I have no other option but to see clarification from ArbCom directly. IRWolfie- (talk) 22:58, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
- Please do. You are pursuing questions that have no bearing on anything except an apparent desire to implicate me in some wrong doing. You should pursue this until you you are satisfied, if that's what you want. (olive (talk) 23:10, 5 April 2013 (UTC))
- I have posted a request for clarification at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Clarification_request:_TimidGuy_ban_appeal. IRWolfie- (talk) 23:17, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
- Please do. You are pursuing questions that have no bearing on anything except an apparent desire to implicate me in some wrong doing. You should pursue this until you you are satisfied, if that's what you want. (olive (talk) 23:10, 5 April 2013 (UTC))