Misplaced Pages

User talk:78.150.28.18: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:38, 9 April 2013 editUh oh Uh Oh Again (talk | contribs)86 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 19:39, 9 April 2013 edit undoMartinevans123 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers232,714 edits Edit war at Annie Lennox?: new sectionNext edit →
Line 7: Line 7:
::::::Alex Salmond was an excellent example of someone who it would be inappropriate to refer to as British over Scottish. I'm not anti-Scottish, I'm anti-nationalism yes, but not anti-Scottish. KT Tunstall in particularly is prominent as a British artist. Not mentioning the UK in the origin tag would thus be dis-honest. However, there is no particularly strong association with Scotland but not Britain so British is more appropriate (especially given the whole BRIT award thing) since the rule of thumb is to use the sovereign state. ] (]) ::::::Alex Salmond was an excellent example of someone who it would be inappropriate to refer to as British over Scottish. I'm not anti-Scottish, I'm anti-nationalism yes, but not anti-Scottish. KT Tunstall in particularly is prominent as a British artist. Not mentioning the UK in the origin tag would thus be dis-honest. However, there is no particularly strong association with Scotland but not Britain so British is more appropriate (especially given the whole BRIT award thing) since the rule of thumb is to use the sovereign state. ] (])
::::::::Again, winning a BRIT award has nothing to do with being British? Look, can't we just let this go? Let the articles remain English, Scottish etc respectively! People know that the UK is four countries, and just because British or whatever, UK etc isnt added into a music article, doesn't mean the UK exists. People know that Scotland is in the UK so what is the big deal? Ps, I'm also not a nationalist but however I think the articles should be left as they are. As this. Right here is what happens! ] (]) 19:38, 9 April 2013 (UTC) ::::::::Again, winning a BRIT award has nothing to do with being British? Look, can't we just let this go? Let the articles remain English, Scottish etc respectively! People know that the UK is four countries, and just because British or whatever, UK etc isnt added into a music article, doesn't mean the UK exists. People know that Scotland is in the UK so what is the big deal? Ps, I'm also not a nationalist but however I think the articles should be left as they are. As this. Right here is what happens! ] (]) 19:38, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

== Edit war at ]? ==

I think you have just broken ] at ]. Could I suggest that you discuss full at the article Talk Page before before making any more reverting edits? Thanks. ] (]) 19:39, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:39, 9 April 2013

Realisable sources

Sources confirming the nationalities of these people have now been applied. Sources cannot be argued with, nor changed! The edit war will not cease. Thanks Uh oh Uh Oh Again (talk) 19:16, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

They do not in anyway count as confirmation. It's just the individuals writing the articles saying that. 78.150.28.18 (talk) 19:21, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
These articles however still confirm their nationality! No articles had I found said British! What satisfaction are you getting from this? And once again! Why are you not changing the likes of Adele, Billy Idol, Paul McCartney? Uh oh Uh Oh Again (talk) 19:23, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
No they don't. Not in any way what so ever do they prove that. All it is is somebody writing their nationality as such. As for why not random english ones. We'll because I'm not going to change everything am I. I'm more annoyed about the attempts to pretend that the UK does not exist then referring to people as Scottish. Why Scottish is more appropriate, for example with Alex Salmond, I would champion that. 78.150.28.18 (talk) 19:27, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Well you could start? So far, you seem to be very very anti-Scottish! Alex Salmond has nothing to do with this! And for your information, no one is "pretending" that the UK doesn't exist! It mentions it in the Scotland articles first line!!! Just because UK isnt added onto a KT Tunstall article doesn't mean the UK has ceased to exist!!! Uh oh Uh Oh Again (talk) 19:30, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Alex Salmond was an excellent example of someone who it would be inappropriate to refer to as British over Scottish. I'm not anti-Scottish, I'm anti-nationalism yes, but not anti-Scottish. KT Tunstall in particularly is prominent as a British artist. Not mentioning the UK in the origin tag would thus be dis-honest. However, there is no particularly strong association with Scotland but not Britain so British is more appropriate (especially given the whole BRIT award thing) since the rule of thumb is to use the sovereign state. 78.150.28.18 (talk)
Again, winning a BRIT award has nothing to do with being British? Look, can't we just let this go? Let the articles remain English, Scottish etc respectively! People know that the UK is four countries, and just because British or whatever, UK etc isnt added into a music article, doesn't mean the UK exists. People know that Scotland is in the UK so what is the big deal? Ps, I'm also not a nationalist but however I think the articles should be left as they are. As this. Right here is what happens! Uh oh Uh Oh Again (talk) 19:38, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Edit war at Annie Lennox?

I think you have just broken WP:3RR at Annie Lennox. Could I suggest that you discuss full at the article Talk Page before before making any more reverting edits? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:39, 9 April 2013 (UTC)