Misplaced Pages

Secular Islam Summit: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:31, 9 April 2013 editKwamikagami (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Template editors475,345 edits Reception: then let's at least not put your personal bias first.← Previous edit Revision as of 05:24, 10 April 2013 edit undoKwamikagami (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Template editors475,345 edits Undid revision 549630154 by Roscelese (talk) as always, Roscelese, you need to work on consensus for your POV pushingNext edit →
(9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
The summit was described by ] of the '']'' as "a landmark."<ref name=WSJ>{{cite web|last=Stephens |first=Bret |url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117314819125027850.html |title=Islam's Other Radicals - WSJ.com |publisher=Online.wsj.com |date=2007-03-06 |accessdate=2012-01-27}}</ref> ] of the politically conservative American magazine ''National Review'', who attended the summit, described the participants as ex-Muslims and believers,<ref name="NRLedeen">{{citation |url=http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/138620/secular-islam-summit/michael-ledeen |publisher=]|title=Secular Islam Summit|date=2007-03-06 |accessdate=2012-07-27}}</ref> adding, "I think it is no longer possible for people to say there are no reformist (or “moderate”) Muslims."<ref name="NRLedeen"/> Arnold Trebach, a professor emeritus of ]'s Department of Justice, Law and Society, also mentioned the summit in the ] as "a tiny spark of hope and reason," saying that all must try to protect the lives of the speakers.<ref> by Arnold Trebach, ],March 15, 2007</ref> The summit was described by ] of the '']'' as "a landmark."<ref name=WSJ>{{cite web|last=Stephens |first=Bret |url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117314819125027850.html |title=Islam's Other Radicals - WSJ.com |publisher=Online.wsj.com |date=2007-03-06 |accessdate=2012-01-27}}</ref> ] of the politically conservative American magazine ''National Review'', who attended the summit, described the participants as ex-Muslims and believers,<ref name="NRLedeen">{{citation |url=http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/138620/secular-islam-summit/michael-ledeen |publisher=]|title=Secular Islam Summit|date=2007-03-06 |accessdate=2012-07-27}}</ref> adding, "I think it is no longer possible for people to say there are no reformist (or “moderate”) Muslims."<ref name="NRLedeen"/> Arnold Trebach, a professor emeritus of ]'s Department of Justice, Law and Society, also mentioned the summit in the ] as "a tiny spark of hope and reason," saying that all must try to protect the lives of the speakers.<ref> by Arnold Trebach, ],March 15, 2007</ref>


On the same weekend as the summit, the south Florida office of the ] (CAIR), a Muslim advocacy group, met in ]. Attendees of the two meetings denounced each other, with members of CAIR dismissing summit speakers as "atheists and non-Muslims" hostile to Islam, and with speakers of the summit characterizing CAIR as Saudi-funded Islamists "hypersensitive to any criticism of Muslims" and "too quick to declare who is, or who is not, a true Muslim."<ref name="usnews">{{citation |url=http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/070408/16muslims_2.htm |publisher=US News and Word report |title=Fighting for the soul of Islam}}</ref> CAIR elaborated on their criticism of the summit, referring to Haddad's comments on the speakers' extremism and stating that the summit was wrong in promoting the idea that only former Muslims who disdained Islam, rather than Muslims who desired reform, could bring effective change. They attributed to growing Islamophobia the idea of "reforming" Islam by converting Muslims.<ref>{{Cite news |title=Reform is already in Islamic tradition |first=Parvez |last=Ahmad |work=Florida Times-Union |date=March 22, 2007}}</ref> ], in an op-ed titled "What is CAIR Afraid Of?", described CAIR as a bullying Islamist group and stated that "... the Secular Islam Summit offers a ray of hope," envisioning a larger number of moderate Muslims further discomfiting the civil rights group.<ref>, ], 3 July 2007. Archived </ref> ] of Georgetown University commented on the lineup of speakers, describing them as being extreme in their anti-Islam views and adding that "legitimate scholars are horrified by the lineup."<ref name="tbt">{{Cite news |work=Tampa Bay Times |url=http://www.sptimes.com/2007/03/06/Southpinellas/Intelligence_conferen.shtml |date=March 6, 2007 |first=Meg |last=Laughlin |title=Intelligence conference draws criticism}}</ref> On the same weekend as the summit, the south Florida office of the ] (CAIR), a Muslim advocacy group, met in ]. Attendees of the two meetings denounced each other, with members of CAIR dismissing summit speakers as "atheists and non-Muslims" hostile to Islam, and with speakers of the summit characterizing CAIR as Saudi-funded Islamists "hypersensitive to any criticism of Muslims" and "too quick to declare who is, or who is not, a true Muslim."<ref name="usnews">{{citation |url=http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/070408/16muslims_2.htm |publisher=US News and Word report |title=Fighting for the soul of Islam}}</ref> CAIR elaborated on their criticism of the summit, referring to Haddad's comments on the speakers' extremism and stating that the summit was wrong in promoting the idea that only former Muslims who disdained Islam, rather than Muslims who desired reform, could bring effective change. They attributed to growing Islamophobia the idea of "reforming" Islam by converting Muslims.<ref>{{citation |url=http://jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/032207/opl_8647594.shtml |title=Reform is already in Islamic tradition |first=Parvez |last=Ahmad |work=Florida Times-Union |date=March 22, 2007}}</ref> ], in an op-ed titled "What is CAIR Afraid Of?", described CAIR as a bullying Islamist group and stated that "... the Secular Islam Summit offers a ray of hope," envisioning a larger number of moderate Muslims further discomfiting the civil rights group.<ref>, ], 3 July 2007. Archived </ref> ] of Georgetown University's ]<ref> of the Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding]</ref> commented on the lineup of speakers, describing them as being extreme in their views and adding that "legitimate scholars are horrified by the lineup."<ref name="tbt">{{Cite news |work=Tampa Bay Times |url=http://www.sptimes.com/2007/03/06/Southpinellas/Intelligence_conferen.shtml |date=March 6, 2007 |first=Meg |last=Laughlin |title=Intelligence conference draws criticism}}</ref>


==Summit activities== ==Summit activities==

Revision as of 05:24, 10 April 2013

The Secular Islam Summit was an international forum for secularists of Islamic societies, held 4–5 March 2007 in St. Petersburg, Florida. It was largely organized and funded by the Center for Inquiry, a secular humanist educational organization, along with secular Muslims such as Banafsheh Zand-Bonazzi and in partnership with the International Intelligence Summit, a forum on terrorism.

Overview

The common ground of the participants was the belief that Islam and secular democracy should be compatible. They agreed that Islam must be either a religion or a political philosophy, not both. According to Banafsheh Zand-Bonazzi, one of the organizers, one of the summit's goals was to be a "sanctuary" for victims of Islamism and a forum for the embrace of secular values.

Participants

Speakers ranged from former believers to devout reformers, including Ibn Warraq (the pen name of an ex-Muslim author known for criticism of Islam), Tawfik Hamid (an ex-jihadist, now in hiding), Afshin Ellian (an Iranian refugee under police protection), Irshad Manji (a self-described "radical traditionalist"), Ayaan Hirsi Ali (a former member of the Dutch Parliament), and Hasan Mahmud (an expert on Islamic law).

Several devout Muslims that had been invited to speak, such as Faisal Abdul Rauf and Mike Ghouse, did not attend; one that did, Irshad Manji, criticized the summit for "not making stronger overtures to practicing Muslims", and urged them to seek common ground.

Media attention

The summit was covered by Al-Jazeera and broadcast live on the Glenn Beck program on CNN.

Reception

The summit was described by Bret Stephens of the Wall Street Journal as "a landmark." Michael Ledeen of the politically conservative American magazine National Review, who attended the summit, described the participants as ex-Muslims and believers, adding, "I think it is no longer possible for people to say there are no reformist (or “moderate”) Muslims." Arnold Trebach, a professor emeritus of American University's Department of Justice, Law and Society, also mentioned the summit in the Washington Times as "a tiny spark of hope and reason," saying that all must try to protect the lives of the speakers.

On the same weekend as the summit, the south Florida office of the Council on American–Islamic Relations (CAIR), a Muslim advocacy group, met in Fort Lauderdale. Attendees of the two meetings denounced each other, with members of CAIR dismissing summit speakers as "atheists and non-Muslims" hostile to Islam, and with speakers of the summit characterizing CAIR as Saudi-funded Islamists "hypersensitive to any criticism of Muslims" and "too quick to declare who is, or who is not, a true Muslim." CAIR elaborated on their criticism of the summit, referring to Haddad's comments on the speakers' extremism and stating that the summit was wrong in promoting the idea that only former Muslims who disdained Islam, rather than Muslims who desired reform, could bring effective change. They attributed to growing Islamophobia the idea of "reforming" Islam by converting Muslims. Investor's Business Daily, in an op-ed titled "What is CAIR Afraid Of?", described CAIR as a bullying Islamist group and stated that "... the Secular Islam Summit offers a ray of hope," envisioning a larger number of moderate Muslims further discomfiting the civil rights group. Yvonne Haddad of Georgetown University's Prince Alwaleed Center for Muslim–Christian Understanding commented on the lineup of speakers, describing them as being extreme in their views and adding that "legitimate scholars are horrified by the lineup."

Summit activities

Ibn Warraq and Irshad Manji opened the summit at Sunday morning, followed by a panel discussions on the topic "Inside the jihadi mind". After the lunch, other panel discussions were held on the topics "Rediscovering secular traditions" and "Separating mosque and state" (with Afshin Ellian). The day was closed with a reception, after which some closed working group meetings were held.

The following morning opened with a panel discussion on "Secularism and Islamic thought." After the lunch ms Zand-Bonazzi released the joint declaration (see below) in a press conference which was followed by an open forum, in which all panelists were invited to participate. The next items on the agenda were a speech by Tawfik Hamid called "Islamism & terrorism: facts, reality & possible solutions" and a final panel discussion on "Women, children, & Islam."

Wafa Sultan, who participated in the last panel discussion, accepted an award from the Center for Inquiry, saying that she believed there was no such thing as moderate Islam, a view shared by some but not all of the attendees.

St. Petersburg Declaration

For other, similarly named declarations, see Saint Petersburg Declaration.

Although delegates to the summit "differed sharply on particulars", on March 5 they released a public manifesto calling for reform within Islam. The text, known as the St. Petersburg Declaration, expressed support for the separation of mosque and state, equal protection for all religions, legal and social equality between men and women, and unrestricted critical study of traditional practices in Islam.

Irshad Manji decided not to endorse the declaration, saying it was not sufficiently inclusive of practicing Muslims like herself; she elaborated that being a secular Muslim did not entail renouncing Islam for atheism or another religion, and that support for the separation of mosque and state was not un-Islamic. Hasan Mahmud, also a devout Muslim, did sign.

References

  1. First "Secular Islam Summit" to convene early next month in Florida, Kuwait News Agency, Feb 2007, archived from the original on 2012.05.18 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |archivedate= (help)
  2. ^ Susan Jacoby (April 19 2007), Diverse Muslims, Violent Islamist Fundamentalism, Washington Post {{citation}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  3. ^ Fighting for the soul of Islam, US News and Word report
  4. Andrew Bieszad, The Conference on Secular Islam, Telospress.com
  5. Kuwait News Agency; "First "Secular Islam Summit" to convene early next month in Florida; 27 February 2007
  6. ^ Stephens, Bret (2007-03-06). "Islam's Other Radicals - WSJ.com". Online.wsj.com. Retrieved 2012-01-27.
  7. ^ Geneive Abdo (March 17 2007), A More Islamic Islam, Washington Post {{citation}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  8. ^ Elfenbein, Madeleine (April 19, 2007). "Irshad Manji's Flying Leap". The American Prospect.
  9. ^ Secular Islam Summit, National Review, 2007-03-06, retrieved 2012-07-27
  10. The spirit of Islamic reform by Arnold Trebach, Washington Times,March 15, 2007
  11. Ahmad, Parvez (March 22, 2007), "Reform is already in Islamic tradition", Florida Times-Union
  12. What Is CAIR Afraid Of?, Investor's Business Daily, 3 July 2007. Archived here
  13. Core Faculty of the Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding]
  14. Laughlin, Meg (March 6, 2007). "Intelligence conference draws criticism". Tampa Bay Times.
  15. Program on the website of the Secular Islam Summit. December 28, 2006 via Archive.org
  16. ^ "The St. Petersburg Declaration". Centerforinquiry.net. 2007-04-05. Retrieved 2012-01-27.

External links

Categories: