Misplaced Pages

User talk:H1p3ri0n: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:24, 25 April 2013 editH1p3ri0n (talk | contribs)47 edits Jean-Philippe Guillemin← Previous edit Revision as of 13:15, 25 April 2013 edit undoJtalledo (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers28,600 edits Jean-Philippe GuilleminNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
There was a merge request on this article. It was uncontested, so it was merged and redirect into ]. So redirecting it was '''not''' vandalism. And considering your username and edit history, I think you have a ]. --] ] 12:06, 25 April 2013 (UTC) There was a merge request on this article. It was uncontested, so it was merged and redirect into ]. So redirecting it was '''not''' vandalism. And considering your username and edit history, I think you have a ]. --] ] 12:06, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
** The article was created by a contributor who thought it was legitimate to document the work of JP Guillemin in several domains, computer programming, music. This redirection restrict this work to only one domain, which is not correct. The article is a stub, not really finished but deserves to be there, and to be improved, not redirected. The statement that everything of the original article is present in #Zenwalk is false. You know what? I'm tired of this :) ** The article was created by a contributor who thought it was legitimate to document the work of JP Guillemin in several domains, computer programming, music. This redirection restrict this work to only one domain, which is not correct. The article is a stub, not really finished but deserves to be there, and to be improved, not redirected. The statement that everything of the original article is present in #Zenwalk is false. You know what? I'm tired of this :)
:The article is back, but he is noted for his work on Zenwalk. His jazz music hobby is not worth noting. --] ] 13:15, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:15, 25 April 2013

Jean-Philippe Guillemin

There was a merge request on this article. It was uncontested, so it was merged and redirect into Zenwalk. So redirecting it was not vandalism. And considering your username and edit history, I think you have a conflict of interest. --Jtalledo (talk) 12:06, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

    • The article was created by a contributor who thought it was legitimate to document the work of JP Guillemin in several domains, computer programming, music. This redirection restrict this work to only one domain, which is not correct. The article is a stub, not really finished but deserves to be there, and to be improved, not redirected. The statement that everything of the original article is present in #Zenwalk is false. You know what? I'm tired of this :)
The article is back, but he is noted for his work on Zenwalk. His jazz music hobby is not worth noting. --Jtalledo (talk) 13:15, 25 April 2013 (UTC)