Misplaced Pages

User talk:Born2cycle: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:00, 27 April 2013 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Robot: Archiving 5 threads (older than 7d) to User talk:Born2cycle/Archive 8.← Previous edit Revision as of 10:22, 29 April 2013 edit undoOhconfucius (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers328,947 edits Suicide of Kelly Yeomans RM: new sectionNext edit →
Line 17: Line 17:


] has mentioned you in ]. ] has mentioned you in ].

== Suicide of Kelly Yeomans RM ==

I applaud your tenacity, but I fear that not only are you barking up the wrong tree , you are arguing with much to much forceful conviction and failing to ]. I sense that some already feel that you are arguing to the point of being disruptive, and I would strongly suggest that you discontinue your participation in that discussion, for everyone's sake. Cheers, --<small><span style="background-color:#ffffff;border: 1px solid;">]</span></small><sup>]</sup> 10:22, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:22, 29 April 2013

Coherent reply policy

If I put a message on your talk page, I will be watching that page for a reply. If you leave a message here, I will reply here, unless you request otherwise.


Born2cycle Talk Archives
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6
Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12
Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15
Archive 16


This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.

A user has mentioned you in a discussion.

User:Dicklyon has mentioned you in this discussion.

Suicide of Kelly Yeomans RM

I applaud your tenacity, but I fear that not only are you barking up the wrong tree here, you are arguing with much to much forceful conviction and failing to back off. I sense that some already feel that you are arguing to the point of being disruptive, and I would strongly suggest that you discontinue your participation in that discussion, for everyone's sake. Cheers, -- Ohconfucius  10:22, 29 April 2013 (UTC)