Misplaced Pages

User talk:Lutherian: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:50, 26 May 2006 editInShaneee (talk | contribs)15,956 edits Blocked for 48 hours← Previous edit Revision as of 18:00, 27 May 2006 edit undoThreeafterthree (talk | contribs)21,164 editsm Blocked for 48 hours: huhhh??Next edit →
Line 89: Line 89:


:::It's incivil and unacceptable. Misplaced Pages is not a place to voice your personal opinions and points of view, especially when they are attacking the points of view of others. This is not harrassment, this is policy, and if you cannot follow it, you will be blocked again. --] 18:50, 26 May 2006 (UTC) :::It's incivil and unacceptable. Misplaced Pages is not a place to voice your personal opinions and points of view, especially when they are attacking the points of view of others. This is not harrassment, this is policy, and if you cannot follow it, you will be blocked again. --] 18:50, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

::::"Misplaced Pages is not a place to voice your personal opinions and points of view"....please tell me you are joking! What are the talk pages for?? Then you say.."especially when they are attacking '''the points of view''' of others??? Which is it?? Misplaced Pages is POV central, come on. Wait, let me guess, I am attacking your point of view?? *slapping back of hand* tisk tisk Tom. --] 18:00, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:00, 27 May 2006

welcome to my discussion section

Re:

I'm not sure if English is your first language or whether you have cognitive issues but the meer suggestion that a new user such as yourself that jumps into controversial topics might perhaps be a sockpuppet is not only not a personal attack but a daily occurance on wikipedia. Fear not, this is not turkey or mongolia. You are innocent until proven otherwise.--Eupator 15:57, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

I find what you say highly offensive, to suggest that I might be an idiot is very insulting indeed. Lutherian 16:09, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
Redundancy is not the answer to your perceived grievances. Since I didn't call you an idiot and you brought it up I must assume that others have in the past.--Eupator 16:17, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
To suggest that I might have cognitive issues is analogous to calling me an idiot and to suggest that others might have called me an idiot in the past is once again insulting Lutherian 16:35, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. Note that this 3RR block is entered in light of your sock puppetry; see WP:RCU for more details on the evidence. --Nlu (talk) 22:03, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Personal attacks

Hi Lutherian, in regards to this comment, please see Misplaced Pages's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. —Khoikhoi 05:11, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Once again, your next comment wasn't any better. Please cease from personally attacking other users, it helps no one and only escalates the situation. I don't want to see you blocked again. —Khoikhoi 05:20, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
Dont want to see me blocked again? LOL, is that the joke of the century?
What are you talking about? Why would I want to see you blocked? —Khoikhoi 05:28, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
uhhhh, do you not remember? You banded together with your buddies to have me blocked a couple of months back!!!
I know you don't want me to talk to you, but I believe you are mistaken. I requested that the anon troll be blocked, not you! —Khoikhoi 05:39, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
Khoikhoi, please take a look at the comments of Eupator above and please tell me if it does not constitute a personal attack of the first order. I never saw the guy receive warnings for that or many of the other personal attacks that he produced! Talk about being impartial, tsk tsk!
He was warned, look here. —Khoikhoi 05:51, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
Fine, so be it. —Khoikhoi 05:33, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you may be blocked for disruption. —Khoikhoi 05:55, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Now what did you post this for?
This. —Khoikhoi 06:23, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
you have no right of deleting my posts in the discussions section and more gravely, accusing me of sockpuppeting! Just happens to be that an anon agrees with me and you jump to the conclusion that I must be a sockpuppet? Just shows how biased you are! But please, go ahead and submit my case for sockpuppeting, I have nothing to hide!
It's already been submitted, which proves that you are the same person as 24.238.202.157 (talk · contribs), and the anon who reverted me is 24.211.192.250 (talk · contribs). I have every right to remove your personal attacks. Read Misplaced Pages:Remove personal attacks. —Khoikhoi 06:37, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
Thats old news and unless I am blind, nowhere does it make the link with 24.238... or 24.211..., if you know anything about ip addresses you will notice that the previous two are designated for a different country altogether! Or maybe to fool you I change countries? LOL!
Well, it doesn't matter anymore, you've been reported. —Khoikhoi 06:50, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
Well that doesnt matter because making baseless accusations about me will only get you in trouble. I find this behavior of yours highly offensive and will be reporting it! I see that your history on wiki is murky!

Making personal attacks

I have come to you as an uninvolved Misplaced Pages administrator responding to a notice on the personal attack noticeboard. Please try to keep any comments to the contents of other people's edits and not to their perceived personalities - even if they have been trying to comment about you personally. David | Talk 08:37, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

FYI: apparent 3RR violation on Armenian Genocide

As a matter of courtesy, please be aware that I have reported you for an apparent WP:3RR violation on Armenian Genocide. Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:13, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

You should also note that you are only one revert away from a 3RR violation on Talk:Armenian Genocide. Fightindaman 16:21, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

User notice: temporary 3RR block

====Regarding reversions made on May 2 2006 (UTC) to Armenian Genocide====

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley 18:07, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Hi. Sorry - prev block didn't work; I've done it properly now. The text above is boilerplate; I've struck some out. Consider it to be replaced by "please don't return to edit warring" William M. Connolley 18:26, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

THOTH's message

I wasn't aware of that, I was going to warn him after I got your message, but I have decided not to to prove "how biased I am". Insulting people doesn't get you anywhere, learn that. Muhabbetle, —Khoikhoi 00:28, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Who did I cry at for help? ¿Qué juego?Khoikhoi 18:54, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
Ok, let's argue! What do you have to say about the numerous historical accounts by people who witnessed the genocide? For an interesting read you might want to check out User:FrancisTyers/Nationalist test. —Khoikhoi 19:07, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Civility

Regarding edits such as this and this: Please remember that WP:CIVIL requires that we be disrespectful to all other editors, even during a heated dispute. Continued sarcastic, dismissive, and personally harmful comments could be construed as disruptive, and may result in a temporary loss of editing privilages. --InShaneee 01:11, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning: continue making highly incivil edits such as this and you will be blocked from editing. --InShaneee 18:25, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Owned

)--Eupator 12:02, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Blocked for 48 hours

Regarding edits such as this:

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for disrupting Misplaced Pages by making personal attacks. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. --InShaneee 20:59, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Regarding this edit:

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you may be blocked for disruption. --InShaneee 19:00, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

im sorry but I fail to understand how this statement of mine constitutes a personal attack. Criticizing the policy of a country DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A PERSONAL ATTACK!!!!
It's incivil and unacceptable. Misplaced Pages is not a place to voice your personal opinions and points of view, especially when they are attacking the points of view of others. This is not harrassment, this is policy, and if you cannot follow it, you will be blocked again. --InShaneee 18:50, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
"Misplaced Pages is not a place to voice your personal opinions and points of view"....please tell me you are joking! What are the talk pages for?? Then you say.."especially when they are attacking the points of view of others??? Which is it?? Misplaced Pages is POV central, come on. Wait, let me guess, I am attacking your point of view?? *slapping back of hand* tisk tisk Tom. --Tom 18:00, 27 May 2006 (UTC)