Misplaced Pages

Talk:Baroque in Poland: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:48, 11 February 2007 editPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers285,784 edits {{WikiProject Poland|class=B|importance=High}}← Previous edit Revision as of 04:01, 16 May 2013 edit undoPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers285,784 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Poland|class=B|importance=High}} {{WikiProject Poland
|class=C
| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = yes
| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = no
| b3 <!--Structure --> = no
| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = yes
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = yes
|importance=High}}

==Untitled==

Let me voice my opinion concerning the latest additions to this article. It's hard for a laymen in architecture to see a difference between the Jesuit cathedrals in the PLC and the New World. Please elaborate on those features that set the Baroque art in Poland apart from that in, say, Sweden, Ukraine, Belarus, and Bohemia. Sarmatism and shaving seem to be of little relevance to the baroque art, so unrelevant stuff should be removed. --] | ] 10:22, 14 February 2006 (UTC) Let me voice my opinion concerning the latest additions to this article. It's hard for a laymen in architecture to see a difference between the Jesuit cathedrals in the PLC and the New World. Please elaborate on those features that set the Baroque art in Poland apart from that in, say, Sweden, Ukraine, Belarus, and Bohemia. Sarmatism and shaving seem to be of little relevance to the baroque art, so unrelevant stuff should be removed. --] | ] 10:22, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
----- -----
Line 6: Line 16:
:It would be useful to pull more information from the website which it seems to be plagarizing from. The original article is of a much superior quality. The current one gives no sense to the opulence of the Commonwealth at this time. -~~ :It would be useful to pull more information from the website which it seems to be plagarizing from. The original article is of a much superior quality. The current one gives no sense to the opulence of the Commonwealth at this time. -~~
::The article clearly indicates its sources, so it is not a ]. And while certain similarities are visible, as a consequence of using this text as a major and primary reference, it seems to have been sufficiently different not to be a ]. Of course, it could surely use expantion, feel free to do so - especially if you can find other sources to use.--] <sup><font color="green">]</font></sup> 05:12, 23 May 2006 (UTC) ::The article clearly indicates its sources, so it is not a ]. And while certain similarities are visible, as a consequence of using this text as a major and primary reference, it seems to have been sufficiently different not to be a ]. Of course, it could surely use expantion, feel free to do so - especially if you can find other sources to use.--] <sup><font color="green">]</font></sup> 05:12, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

==B-class review==
Upon closer review, I think this fails B-class due to being not comprehensive enough. I think this needs dedicated sections on literature and visual arts. The gallery should probably go, too. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]&#124;]</sub> 04:01, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:01, 16 May 2013

WikiProject iconPoland C‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Let me voice my opinion concerning the latest additions to this article. It's hard for a laymen in architecture to see a difference between the Jesuit cathedrals in the PLC and the New World. Please elaborate on those features that set the Baroque art in Poland apart from that in, say, Sweden, Ukraine, Belarus, and Bohemia. Sarmatism and shaving seem to be of little relevance to the baroque art, so unrelevant stuff should be removed. --Ghirla | talk 10:22, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

This article needs revision in order not to violate copyright at this site. I've made a start. --Wetman 13:13, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

It would be useful to pull more information from the website which it seems to be plagarizing from. The original article is of a much superior quality. The current one gives no sense to the opulence of the Commonwealth at this time. -~~
The article clearly indicates its sources, so it is not a plagiarism. And while certain similarities are visible, as a consequence of using this text as a major and primary reference, it seems to have been sufficiently different not to be a copyvio. Of course, it could surely use expantion, feel free to do so - especially if you can find other sources to use.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 05:12, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

B-class review

Upon closer review, I think this fails B-class due to being not comprehensive enough. I think this needs dedicated sections on literature and visual arts. The gallery should probably go, too. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:01, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Categories: