Revision as of 16:03, 16 May 2013 editNeotarf (talk | contribs)4,029 edits as far as I know, this is still on the table← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:48, 16 May 2013 edit undoArcticocean (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Extended confirmed users46,227 edits rNext edit → | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* Under "other actions", the last item links to a clarification request that ended in ''March'' – two months ago. ] ]] 15:29, 16 May 2013 (UTC) | * Under "other actions", the last item links to a clarification request that ended in ''March'' – two months ago. ] ]] 15:29, 16 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
**The notifications in March, for instance , said "The request is archived; however, an arbitrator is planning on offering an arbitrator motion 'very shortly'", but as far as I know, this has not been done. —] (]) 16:03, 16 May 2013 (UTC) | **The notifications in March, for instance , said "The request is archived; however, an arbitrator is planning on offering an arbitrator motion 'very shortly'", but as far as I know, this has not been done. —] (]) 16:03, 16 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
***By a happy coincidence, the follow-up to that clarification request was scheduled some time ago to take place this week. However, the original clarification surely does not belong in this week's arbitration report, given how stale it now is. ] ]] 21:48, 16 May 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:48, 16 May 2013
← Back to Arbitration report
Discuss this story
- Under "other actions", the last item links to a clarification request that ended in March – two months ago. AGK 15:29, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- The notifications in March, for instance here, said "The request is archived; however, an arbitrator is planning on offering an arbitrator motion 'very shortly'", but as far as I know, this has not been done. —Neotarf (talk) 16:03, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- By a happy coincidence, the follow-up to that clarification request was scheduled some time ago to take place this week. However, the original clarification surely does not belong in this week's arbitration report, given how stale it now is. AGK 21:48, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- The notifications in March, for instance here, said "The request is archived; however, an arbitrator is planning on offering an arbitrator motion 'very shortly'", but as far as I know, this has not been done. —Neotarf (talk) 16:03, 16 May 2013 (UTC)