| Revision as of 15:01, 20 May 2013 editIncnis Mrsi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers11,646 edits →Talk page, user page issues: re← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:22, 20 May 2013 edit undoSitush (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers260,192 edits →Talk page, user page issues: why ten?Next edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| Hello Incnis Mrsi. I got a note from {{IP|76.189.109.155}} about , for which you gave them . In my opinion, such a warning--for vandalism!--is seriously overblown. So they made a mistake by posting a notice on the user page rather than the talk page; that's not vandalism by a long stretch, since vandalism is defined as a conscious attempt to disrupt the project and there is no reason to think that their edit falls under vandalism as defined in ]. In addition, your comment to them, , is blatantly uncivil. From what I can tell, this IP editor is a valuable contributor, and at the very least you should have applied good faith and refrained from personal insults; that kind of behavior creates a nasty atmosphere in which people will be less likely to want to contribute to our beautiful project. I hope you will cease to make such comments and leave such inappropriate templated warnings. In addition, I saw you archived your talk page right after that exchange; please allow me to point you to ], which says that ''moving'' the talk page to create an archive is now deprecated. Copying and pasting, as described in ], is the preferred method. Thank you. ] (]) 14:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC) | Hello Incnis Mrsi. I got a note from {{IP|76.189.109.155}} about , for which you gave them . In my opinion, such a warning--for vandalism!--is seriously overblown. So they made a mistake by posting a notice on the user page rather than the talk page; that's not vandalism by a long stretch, since vandalism is defined as a conscious attempt to disrupt the project and there is no reason to think that their edit falls under vandalism as defined in ]. In addition, your comment to them, , is blatantly uncivil. From what I can tell, this IP editor is a valuable contributor, and at the very least you should have applied good faith and refrained from personal insults; that kind of behavior creates a nasty atmosphere in which people will be less likely to want to contribute to our beautiful project. I hope you will cease to make such comments and leave such inappropriate templated warnings. In addition, I saw you archived your talk page right after that exchange; please allow me to point you to ], which says that ''moving'' the talk page to create an archive is now deprecated. Copying and pasting, as described in ], is the preferred method. Thank you. ] (]) 14:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
| : There are reasons for which the cut-and-paste is preferred for frequently used public talk pages, but I do not see a problem in moving the old talk page; drop me a link if there were arguments against it even as a manually-controlled operation. Please, specify at least ten of my ''inappropriate templated warnings'' (or apologize for your defamation) and, possibly, I will continue to communicate with you. I am not willing discuss 76.189.109.155 publicly any more — reply to my email please if you have further questions. ] (]) 15:01, 20 May 2013 (UTC) | : There are reasons for which the cut-and-paste is preferred for frequently used public talk pages, but I do not see a problem in moving the old talk page; drop me a link if there were arguments against it even as a manually-controlled operation. Please, specify at least ten of my ''inappropriate templated warnings'' (or apologize for your defamation) and, possibly, I will continue to communicate with you. I am not willing discuss 76.189.109.155 publicly any more — reply to my email please if you have further questions. ] (]) 15:01, 20 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :: I'm curious: why do you want ''ten'' or more examples? Isn't one inappropriate claim of vandalism sufficient? Would it not just be simpler for you to acknowledge that you erred rather than drag the matter on? Oh, and unsustainable accusations of defamation don't help your position, either. - ] (]) 15:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:22, 20 May 2013
User talk:Incnis Mrsi/Archive 2/^
Talk page, user page issues
Hello Incnis Mrsi. I got a note from 76.189.109.155 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) about this edit of theirs, for which you gave them this warning. In my opinion, such a warning--for vandalism!--is seriously overblown. So they made a mistake by posting a notice on the user page rather than the talk page; that's not vandalism by a long stretch, since vandalism is defined as a conscious attempt to disrupt the project and there is no reason to think that their edit falls under vandalism as defined in Misplaced Pages:Vandalism. In addition, your comment to them, "I am really happy that English Misplaced Pages has so few people here like you, 76.189.109.155", is blatantly uncivil. From what I can tell, this IP editor is a valuable contributor, and at the very least you should have applied good faith and refrained from personal insults; that kind of behavior creates a nasty atmosphere in which people will be less likely to want to contribute to our beautiful project. I hope you will cease to make such comments and leave such inappropriate templated warnings. In addition, I saw you archived your talk page right after that exchange; please allow me to point you to Help:Archiving a talk page/Other procedures, which says that moving the talk page to create an archive is now deprecated. Copying and pasting, as described in Help:Archiving_a_talk_page#Cut_and_paste_procedure, is the preferred method. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 14:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- There are reasons for which the cut-and-paste is preferred for frequently used public talk pages, but I do not see a problem in moving the old talk page; drop me a link if there were arguments against it even as a manually-controlled operation. Please, specify at least ten of my inappropriate templated warnings (or apologize for your defamation) and, possibly, I will continue to communicate with you. I am not willing discuss 76.189.109.155 publicly any more — reply to my email please if you have further questions. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:01, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- I'm curious: why do you want ten or more examples? Isn't one inappropriate claim of vandalism sufficient? Would it not just be simpler for you to acknowledge that you erred rather than drag the matter on? Oh, and unsustainable accusations of defamation don't help your position, either. - Sitush (talk) 15:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)