Misplaced Pages

Wikipediocracy: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:14, 25 May 2013 editAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,554,224 editsm Dating maintenance tags: {{Clarify}}← Previous edit Revision as of 14:28, 25 May 2013 edit undoKiefer.Wolfowitz (talk | contribs)39,688 edits Reverted to revision 556721982 by Kiefer.Wolfowitz: Misattribution of results to the site, as opposed to contributors, failure to obey talk page consensus, spotlighting OR on ownership violating due weight. (TW)Next edit →
Line 26: Line 26:
| footnotes = | footnotes =
}} }}
'''Wikipediocracy''' is a website for discussion and criticism of ]. Its contributors have discussed problems with Misplaced Pages and its parent corporation the ]. It has provided journalists with background information on controversies, including a Misplaced Pages editor who pursued vengeance against his literary rivals by writing negative articles about them and the Russian-language Misplaced Pages censoring of information about home-made ]. '''Wikipediocracy''' is a website for discussion and criticism of ]. Its contributors have discussed problems with Misplaced Pages and its parent corporation the ] and have sometimes provided journalists with background information on controversies, such as
* a Misplaced Pages editor pursuing vengeance against his literary rivals by writing negative articles about them;
* the Russian-language Misplaced Pages censoring information about home-made ].
A Wikipediocracy concern that ] employees were allegedly vandalizing Wikipeda resulted in the diagnosis of a software error, which explained the previously mislogged vandalism.

A Wikipediocracy concern is that ] employees were allegedly vandalizing Misplaced Pages, resulted in the diagnosis of a software error, which explained the previously mislogged vandalism.{{clarify|date=May 2013}}

Gregory Kohs, owner of ], is a contributor to Wikipediocracy and owns the domain registration for Wikipediocracy.com.<ref name="Press release">{{cite web |url = http://wikipediocracy.com/press-release/ |title = <nowiki>Announcing a new Misplaced Pages criticism site &#124; Wikipediocracy</nowiki> |website = Wikipediocracy |accessdate = 19 May 2013 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Kohs|first=Gregory|title=Cover-up begins in Misplaced Pages’s Gibraltar scandal|url=http://wikipediocracy.com/2012/10/10/cover-up-begins-in-wikipedias-gibraltar-scandal/|publisher=Wikipediocracy|accessdate=21 May 2013}}</ref>


==Mission== ==Mission==
Line 47: Line 46:


===Relations with governments=== ===Relations with governments===
].]]

Wikipediocracy contributors have assisted in reports on other controversies with Misplaced Pages. For instance, when the ]n government threatened to shut down the ] if it refused to delete descriptions of ] ], Wikipediocracy's ] was the source credited by '']'' to document deletions by editors of the Russian Misplaced Pages, which included every description of "inhalation devices".<ref name="Russian weed">{{cite web |url = http://www.dailydot.com/news/russia-wikipedia-pot-smoking-ban-lifted/ |title = The Daily Dot - Misplaced Pages pot article loses bongs, gets OK&#39;d in Russia |last = Morris |first = Kevin |date = 9 April 2013 |website = The Daily Dot |accessdate= 18 May 2013 }}</ref> Wikipediocracy contributors have assisted in reports on other controversies with Misplaced Pages. For instance, when the ]n government threatened to shut down the ] if it refused to delete descriptions of ] ], Wikipediocracy's ] was the source credited by '']'' to document deletions by editors of the Russian Misplaced Pages, which included every description of "inhalation devices".<ref name="Russian weed">{{cite web |url = http://www.dailydot.com/news/russia-wikipedia-pot-smoking-ban-lifted/ |title = The Daily Dot - Misplaced Pages pot article loses bongs, gets OK&#39;d in Russia |last = Morris |first = Kevin |date = 9 April 2013 |website = The Daily Dot |accessdate= 18 May 2013 }}</ref>


Line 53: Line 54:
===Wikimedia Foundation=== ===Wikimedia Foundation===
A Wikipediocracy blog post reported on what appeared to be persistent vandalism to Misplaced Pages from IP addresses owned by the ] (WMF).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://wikipediocracy.com/2013/04/22/busy-day-at-the-wikimedia-foundation-office/|title=Busy day at the Wikimedia Foundation office?|last=Hogsky|first=Roger|accessdate=24 May 2013}}</ref> Responding to the allegations, WMF spokesman Jay Walsh told ''Daily Dot'' reporter Kevin Morris that the IP addresses did not belong to the Foundation office but to the Foundation servers for the Wikimedia projects. He stated that the addresses were assigned to some edits due to a misconfiguration. Morris tested Walsh's contention and found that it seemed to be accurate.<ref name=vandalizing>{{cite web|url=http://www.dailydot.com/society/wikipedia-staffers-vandalizing-wikipedia/|title=Misplaced Pages says its staffers are not vandalizing Misplaced Pages|last=Morris|first=Kevin|publisher=The Daily Dot|date=23 April 2013|accessdate=24 May 2013}}</ref> A Wikipediocracy blog post reported on what appeared to be persistent vandalism to Misplaced Pages from IP addresses owned by the ] (WMF).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://wikipediocracy.com/2013/04/22/busy-day-at-the-wikimedia-foundation-office/|title=Busy day at the Wikimedia Foundation office?|last=Hogsky|first=Roger|accessdate=24 May 2013}}</ref> Responding to the allegations, WMF spokesman Jay Walsh told ''Daily Dot'' reporter Kevin Morris that the IP addresses did not belong to the Foundation office but to the Foundation servers for the Wikimedia projects. He stated that the addresses were assigned to some edits due to a misconfiguration. Morris tested Walsh's contention and found that it seemed to be accurate.<ref name=vandalizing>{{cite web|url=http://www.dailydot.com/society/wikipedia-staffers-vandalizing-wikipedia/|title=Misplaced Pages says its staffers are not vandalizing Misplaced Pages|last=Morris|first=Kevin|publisher=The Daily Dot|date=23 April 2013|accessdate=24 May 2013}}</ref>

==Domain ownership==
Gregory Kohs, owner of ], is a contributor to Wikipediocracy and owns the domain registration for Wikipediocracy.com.<ref name="Press release">{{cite web |url = http://wikipediocracy.com/press-release/ |title = <nowiki>Announcing a new Misplaced Pages criticism site &#124; Wikipediocracy</nowiki> |website = Wikipediocracy |accessdate = 19 May 2013 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Kohs|first=Gregory|title=Cover-up begins in Misplaced Pages’s Gibraltar scandal|url=http://wikipediocracy.com/2012/10/10/cover-up-begins-in-wikipedias-gibraltar-scandal/|publisher=Wikipediocracy|accessdate=21 May 2013}}</ref>


==See also== ==See also==

Revision as of 14:28, 25 May 2013

Wikipediocracy
Wikipediocracy logo
Wikipediocracy screenshot taken May 18, 2013
Type of siteBlog and forum
Available inEnglish
URLwww.wikipediocracy.com
CommercialNo
RegistrationOptional, required for some features
LaunchedMarch 16, 2012; 12 years ago (2012-03-16)
Current statusActive

Wikipediocracy is a website for discussion and criticism of Misplaced Pages. Its contributors have discussed problems with Misplaced Pages and its parent corporation the Wikimedia Foundation and have sometimes provided journalists with background information on controversies, such as

  • a Misplaced Pages editor pursuing vengeance against his literary rivals by writing negative articles about them;
  • the Russian-language Misplaced Pages censoring information about home-made drug paraphernalia.

A Wikipediocracy concern that Wikimedia Foundation employees were allegedly vandalizing Wikipeda resulted in the diagnosis of a software error, which explained the previously mislogged vandalism.

Mission

The site describes its mission as being:

"to shine the light of scrutiny into the dark crevices of Misplaced Pages and its related projects; to examine the corruption there, along with its structural flaws; and to inoculate the unsuspecting public against the torrent of misinformation, defamation, and general nonsense that issues forth from one of the world’s most frequently visited websites, the 'encyclopedia that anyone can edit.'"

Daily Dot reporter Kevin Morris has stated that the website is "known for digging up dirt on Misplaced Pages's top brass."

Investigations of Misplaced Pages controversies

Wikipediocracy contributors have investigated problems, conflicts, and controversies associated with Misplaced Pages. One investigation found an editor likely to be responsible for a hoax article on the "Bicholim conflict" which lasted five years on Misplaced Pages before being challenged.

Revenge editing

More recently, Wikipediocracy members contacted Salon.com reporter Andrew Leonard to alert him about the "Qworty fiasco", providing background information on Misplaced Pages editor Qworty and writer Robert Clark Young. This background information led to Leonard's writing an article, Revenge, Ego, and the Corruption of Misplaced Pages, which published the fact that "revenge editor" Qworty was indeed Young. Just before the publication of Leonard's article, Qworty had been banned from editing biographies of living persons (on Misplaced Pages) by this message:

some of your comments ... are extremely troubling when considered in light of your edits and the “rants” you posted last month, which were deeply unfortunate and reflected negatively on the project. If you do continue or resume editing in the future, you are directed not to edit biographical articles concerning any living person (other than yourself and excluding reversion of obvious vandalism) and not to make disparaging comments about any living person on any page of Misplaced Pages. I hope you will understand that at this point, these restrictions are in the best interests of all concerned.

Relations with governments

A water pipe hand made from a plastic bottle, aluminium foil, etc.
Wikipediocracy's documentation was the source cited for a story on the Russian-language Misplaced Pages's censorship of marijuana "inhalation devices".

Wikipediocracy contributors have assisted in reports on other controversies with Misplaced Pages. For instance, when the Russian government threatened to shut down the Russian-language Misplaced Pages if it refused to delete descriptions of marijuana paraphernalia, Wikipediocracy's Twitter feed was the source credited by The Daily Dot to document deletions by editors of the Russian Misplaced Pages, which included every description of "inhalation devices".

The involvement of Wikipediocracy members in criticism of Misplaced Pages has been discussed by news stories covering Jimmy Wales's relationship with the government of Kazakhstan and the Gibraltarpedia controversy.

Wikimedia Foundation

A Wikipediocracy blog post reported on what appeared to be persistent vandalism to Misplaced Pages from IP addresses owned by the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF). Responding to the allegations, WMF spokesman Jay Walsh told Daily Dot reporter Kevin Morris that the IP addresses did not belong to the Foundation office but to the Foundation servers for the Wikimedia projects. He stated that the addresses were assigned to some edits due to a misconfiguration. Morris tested Walsh's contention and found that it seemed to be accurate.

Domain ownership

Gregory Kohs, owner of MyWikiBiz, is a contributor to Wikipediocracy and owns the domain registration for Wikipediocracy.com.

See also

References

  1. "wikipediocracy.com info". alexa.com. Retrieved 24 May 2013.
  2. "Wikipediocracy". Retrieved 19 May 2013.
  3. ^ Morris, Kevin (23 April 2013). "Misplaced Pages says its staffers are not vandalizing Misplaced Pages". The Daily Dot. Retrieved 24 May 2013.
  4. Morris, Kevin (1 January 2013). "After a half-decade, massive Misplaced Pages hoax finally exposed". The Daily Dot. Retrieved 18 May 2013.
  5. ^ Nichols, Martha; Berry, Lorraine (May 20, 2013). "What Should We Do About Misplaced Pages?". Talking Writing. Retrieved 20 May 2013.
  6. ^ Leonard, Andrew (17 May 2013). "Revenge, ego and the corruption of Misplaced Pages". Salon.com. Retrieved 18 May 2013.
  7. Morris, Kevin (9 April 2013). "The Daily Dot - Misplaced Pages pot article loses bongs, gets OK'd in Russia". The Daily Dot. Retrieved 18 May 2013.
  8. Morris, Kevin (25 December 2012). "The Daily Dot - Misplaced Pages's odd relationship with the Kazakh dictatorship". The Daily Dot. Retrieved 18 May 2013.
  9. Alfonso, Fernando (25 October 2012). "The Daily Dot - Misplaced Pages's Jimmy Wales breaks silence on resurgence of influence-peddling scandal". The Daily Dot. Retrieved 18 May 2013.
  10. Orlowski, Andrew (26 October 2012). "Wales: Let's ban Gibraltar-crazy Wikipedians for 5 years". The Register. Retrieved 19 May 2013.
  11. Hogsky, Roger. "Busy day at the Wikimedia Foundation office?". Retrieved 24 May 2013.
  12. "Announcing a new Misplaced Pages criticism site | Wikipediocracy". Wikipediocracy. Retrieved 19 May 2013.
  13. Kohs, Gregory. "Cover-up begins in Misplaced Pages's Gibraltar scandal". Wikipediocracy. Retrieved 21 May 2013.
Categories: