| Revision as of 00:27, 26 May 2013 editAlf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers28,976 edits one long sentence into two, fix verb agreement problem by adding new subject← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:55, 26 May 2013 edit undoDrmies (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators406,272 edits Reverted to revision 556782513 by Khazar2: no, and i'll tell you why on the talk page, which is where discussion belongs. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| | footnotes = | | footnotes = | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| '''Wikipediocracy''' is a website for discussion and criticism of ] and its parent corporation the ] |
'''Wikipediocracy''' is a website for discussion and criticism of ]. Its contributors have discussed problems with Misplaced Pages and its parent corporation the ] and have sometimes provided journalists with background information on controversies, such as | ||
| * a Misplaced Pages editor pursuing vengeance against his literary rivals by writing negative articles about them; | |||
| * the Russian-language Misplaced Pages suppressing information about home-made ]. | |||
| A Wikipediocracy concern that ] employees were allegedly vandalizing Misplaced Pages resulted in the diagnosis of a software error, which explained the previously mislogged vandalism. | |||
| ==Mission== | ==Mission== | ||
| Line 35: | Line 38: | ||
| ==Investigations of Misplaced Pages controversies== | ==Investigations of Misplaced Pages controversies== | ||
| Wikipediocracy contributors have investigated problems, conflicts, and controversies associated with Misplaced Pages. | Wikipediocracy contributors have investigated problems, conflicts, and controversies associated with Misplaced Pages. One investigation found an editor likely to be responsible for a hoax article on the "]" which lasted five years on Misplaced Pages before being challenged.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dailydot.com/news/wikipedia-bicholim-conflict-hoax-deleted/|title=After a half-decade, massive Misplaced Pages hoax finally exposed|publisher=The Daily Dot|first=Kevin|last=Morris|date=1 January 2013|accessdate=18 May 2013}}</ref> | ||
| ===Hoax article=== | |||
| One discussion identified the editor likely to be responsible for a hoax article on the "]" which lasted five years on Misplaced Pages before being challenged.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dailydot.com/news/wikipedia-bicholim-conflict-hoax-deleted/|title=After a half-decade, massive Misplaced Pages hoax finally exposed|publisher=The Daily Dot|first=Kevin|last=Morris|date=1 January 2013|accessdate=18 May 2013}}</ref> | |||
| ===Revenge editing=== | ===Revenge editing=== | ||
| More recently, Wikipediocracy members contacted ] reporter Andrew Leonard to alert him about the "Qworty fiasco",<ref name=whatistobedone/> providing background information on Misplaced Pages editor Qworty and writer ].<ref name="Qworty">{{cite web|last=Leonard|first=Andrew|publisher=Salon.com|title=Revenge, ego and the corruption of Misplaced Pages|date=17 May 2013|accessdate=18 May 2013|url=http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/revenge_ego_and_the_corruption_of_wikipedia/}}</ref> This background information led to Leonard's writing an article,<ref name=whatistobedone>{{cite web|url=http://talkingwriting.com/what-should-we-do-about-wikipedia/|title=What Should We Do About Misplaced Pages?|last1=Nichols|first1=Martha|last2=Berry|first2=Lorraine|publisher=Talking Writing|date=May 20, 2013|accessdate=20 May 2013}}</ref> ''Revenge, Ego, and the Corruption of Misplaced Pages'', which published the fact that "revenge editor" Qworty was indeed Young. Just before the publication of Leonard's article, Qworty had been banned from editing biographies of living persons (on Misplaced Pages) by this message:<ref name="Qworty" /> | |||
| <blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
| some of your comments ... are extremely troubling when considered in light of your edits and the “rants” you posted last month, which were deeply unfortunate and reflected negatively on the project. If you do continue or resume editing in the future, you are directed not to edit biographical articles concerning any living person (other than yourself and excluding reversion of obvious vandalism) and not to make disparaging comments about any living person on any page of Misplaced Pages. I hope you will understand that at this point, these restrictions are in the best interests of all concerned.<ref name="Qworty" /></blockquote> | some of your comments ... are extremely troubling when considered in light of your edits and the “rants” you posted last month, which were deeply unfortunate and reflected negatively on the project. If you do continue or resume editing in the future, you are directed not to edit biographical articles concerning any living person (other than yourself and excluding reversion of obvious vandalism) and not to make disparaging comments about any living person on any page of Misplaced Pages. I hope you will understand that at this point, these restrictions are in the best interests of all concerned.<ref name="Qworty" /></blockquote> | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
| ].]] | ].]] | ||
| Wikipediocracy contributors have assisted |
Wikipediocracy contributors have assisted in reports on other controversies with Misplaced Pages. For instance, when the ]n government threatened to shut down the ] if it refused to delete descriptions of ] ], Wikipediocracy's ] was the source credited by '']'' to document the suppression of marijuana "inhalation devices" by editors of the Russian Misplaced Pages description.<ref name="Russian weed">{{cite web |url = http://www.dailydot.com/news/russia-wikipedia-pot-smoking-ban-lifted/ |title = The Daily Dot - Misplaced Pages pot article loses bongs, gets OK'd in Russia |last = Morris |first = Kevin |date = 9 April 2013 |website = The Daily Dot |accessdate= 18 May 2013 }}</ref> | ||
| The involvement of Wikipediocracy members in criticism of Misplaced Pages has been discussed by news stories covering ]'s relationship with the government of ]<ref name="Daily Dot Kazakh">{{cite web |url = http://www.dailydot.com/politics/wikipedia-kazakhstan-dictatorship/ |title = The Daily Dot - Misplaced Pages's odd relationship with the Kazakh dictatorship |last = Morris |first = Kevin |date = 25 December 2012 |website = The Daily Dot |accessdate= 18 May 2013 }}</ref> and the ] ].<ref name="Daily Dot influence">{{cite web |url = http://www.dailydot.com/news/wikipedia-jimmy-wales-influence-scandal/ |title = The Daily Dot - Misplaced Pages's Jimmy Wales breaks silence on resurgence of influence-peddling scandal |last = Alfonso |first = Fernando |date = 25 October 2012 |website =] |accessdate= 18 May 2013 }}</ref><ref name="El Reg Gibraltarpedia">{{cite web |url= http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/10/26/gibraltar_pwns_wikipedia/ |title=Wales: Let's ban Gibraltar-crazy Wikipedians for 5 years|publisher=The Register|first=Andrew|last=Orlowski|authorlink=Andrew Orlowski|date=26 October 2012|accessdate=19 May 2013 }}</ref> | The involvement of Wikipediocracy members in criticism of Misplaced Pages has been discussed by news stories covering ]'s relationship with the government of ]<ref name="Daily Dot Kazakh">{{cite web |url = http://www.dailydot.com/politics/wikipedia-kazakhstan-dictatorship/ |title = The Daily Dot - Misplaced Pages's odd relationship with the Kazakh dictatorship |last = Morris |first = Kevin |date = 25 December 2012 |website = The Daily Dot |accessdate= 18 May 2013 }}</ref> and the ] ].<ref name="Daily Dot influence">{{cite web |url = http://www.dailydot.com/news/wikipedia-jimmy-wales-influence-scandal/ |title = The Daily Dot - Misplaced Pages's Jimmy Wales breaks silence on resurgence of influence-peddling scandal |last = Alfonso |first = Fernando |date = 25 October 2012 |website =] |accessdate= 18 May 2013 }}</ref><ref name="El Reg Gibraltarpedia">{{cite web |url= http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/10/26/gibraltar_pwns_wikipedia/ |title=Wales: Let's ban Gibraltar-crazy Wikipedians for 5 years|publisher=The Register|first=Andrew|last=Orlowski|authorlink=Andrew Orlowski|date=26 October 2012|accessdate=19 May 2013 }}</ref> | ||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
| A Wikipediocracy blog post reported on what appeared to be persistent vandalism to Misplaced Pages from IP addresses owned by the ] (WMF).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://wikipediocracy.com/2013/04/22/busy-day-at-the-wikimedia-foundation-office/|title=Busy day at the Wikimedia Foundation office?|last=Hogsky|first=Roger|accessdate=24 May 2013}}</ref> Responding to the allegations, WMF spokesman Jay Walsh told ''Daily Dot'' reporter Kevin Morris that the IP addresses did not belong to the Foundation office but to the Foundation servers for the Wikimedia projects. He stated that the addresses were assigned to some edits due to a misconfiguration. Morris tested Walsh's contention and found that it seemed to be accurate.<ref name=vandalizing>{{cite web|url=http://www.dailydot.com/society/wikipedia-staffers-vandalizing-wikipedia/|title=Misplaced Pages says its staffers are not vandalizing Misplaced Pages|last=Morris|first=Kevin|publisher=The Daily Dot|date=23 April 2013|accessdate=24 May 2013}}</ref> | A Wikipediocracy blog post reported on what appeared to be persistent vandalism to Misplaced Pages from IP addresses owned by the ] (WMF).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://wikipediocracy.com/2013/04/22/busy-day-at-the-wikimedia-foundation-office/|title=Busy day at the Wikimedia Foundation office?|last=Hogsky|first=Roger|accessdate=24 May 2013}}</ref> Responding to the allegations, WMF spokesman Jay Walsh told ''Daily Dot'' reporter Kevin Morris that the IP addresses did not belong to the Foundation office but to the Foundation servers for the Wikimedia projects. He stated that the addresses were assigned to some edits due to a misconfiguration. Morris tested Walsh's contention and found that it seemed to be accurate.<ref name=vandalizing>{{cite web|url=http://www.dailydot.com/society/wikipedia-staffers-vandalizing-wikipedia/|title=Misplaced Pages says its staffers are not vandalizing Misplaced Pages|last=Morris|first=Kevin|publisher=The Daily Dot|date=23 April 2013|accessdate=24 May 2013}}</ref> | ||
| ==Domain ownership== | |||
| ==Community== | |||
| The site's membership includes former and current ], including administrators and members of ], Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution committee. | |||
| Gregory Kohs, owner of ], is a contributor to Wikipediocracy and owns the domain registration for Wikipediocracy.com.<ref name="Press release">{{cite web |url = http://wikipediocracy.com/press-release/ |title = <nowiki>Announcing a new Misplaced Pages criticism site | Wikipediocracy</nowiki> |website = Wikipediocracy |accessdate = 19 May 2013 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Kohs|first=Gregory|title=Cover-up begins in Misplaced Pages’s Gibraltar scandal|url=http://wikipediocracy.com/2012/10/10/cover-up-begins-in-wikipedias-gibraltar-scandal/|publisher=Wikipediocracy|accessdate=21 May 2013}}</ref> | Gregory Kohs, owner of ], is a contributor to Wikipediocracy and owns the domain registration for Wikipediocracy.com.<ref name="Press release">{{cite web |url = http://wikipediocracy.com/press-release/ |title = <nowiki>Announcing a new Misplaced Pages criticism site | Wikipediocracy</nowiki> |website = Wikipediocracy |accessdate = 19 May 2013 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Kohs|first=Gregory|title=Cover-up begins in Misplaced Pages’s Gibraltar scandal|url=http://wikipediocracy.com/2012/10/10/cover-up-begins-in-wikipedias-gibraltar-scandal/|publisher=Wikipediocracy|accessdate=21 May 2013}}</ref> | ||
Revision as of 00:55, 26 May 2013
 Wikipediocracy logo | |
 Wikipediocracy screenshot taken May 18, 2013 | |
| Type of site | Blog and forum |
|---|---|
| Available in | English |
| URL | www.wikipediocracy.com |
| Commercial | No |
| Registration | Optional, required for some features |
| Launched | March 16, 2012; 12 years ago (2012-03-16) |
| Current status | Active |
Wikipediocracy is a website for discussion and criticism of Misplaced Pages. Its contributors have discussed problems with Misplaced Pages and its parent corporation the Wikimedia Foundation and have sometimes provided journalists with background information on controversies, such as
- a Misplaced Pages editor pursuing vengeance against his literary rivals by writing negative articles about them;
- the Russian-language Misplaced Pages suppressing information about home-made drug paraphernalia.
A Wikipediocracy concern that Wikimedia Foundation employees were allegedly vandalizing Misplaced Pages resulted in the diagnosis of a software error, which explained the previously mislogged vandalism.
Mission
The site describes its mission as being:
"to shine the light of scrutiny into the dark crevices of Misplaced Pages and its related projects; to examine the corruption there, along with its structural flaws; and to inoculate the unsuspecting public against the torrent of misinformation, defamation, and general nonsense that issues forth from one of the world’s most frequently visited websites, the 'encyclopedia that anyone can edit.'"
Daily Dot reporter Kevin Morris has stated that the website is "known for digging up dirt on Misplaced Pages's top brass."
Investigations of Misplaced Pages controversies
Wikipediocracy contributors have investigated problems, conflicts, and controversies associated with Misplaced Pages. One investigation found an editor likely to be responsible for a hoax article on the "Bicholim conflict" which lasted five years on Misplaced Pages before being challenged.
Revenge editing
More recently, Wikipediocracy members contacted Salon.com reporter Andrew Leonard to alert him about the "Qworty fiasco", providing background information on Misplaced Pages editor Qworty and writer Robert Clark Young. This background information led to Leonard's writing an article, Revenge, Ego, and the Corruption of Misplaced Pages, which published the fact that "revenge editor" Qworty was indeed Young. Just before the publication of Leonard's article, Qworty had been banned from editing biographies of living persons (on Misplaced Pages) by this message:
some of your comments ... are extremely troubling when considered in light of your edits and the “rants” you posted last month, which were deeply unfortunate and reflected negatively on the project. If you do continue or resume editing in the future, you are directed not to edit biographical articles concerning any living person (other than yourself and excluding reversion of obvious vandalism) and not to make disparaging comments about any living person on any page of Misplaced Pages. I hope you will understand that at this point, these restrictions are in the best interests of all concerned.
Relations with governments
Wikipediocracy contributors have assisted in reports on other controversies with Misplaced Pages. For instance, when the Russian government threatened to shut down the Russian-language Misplaced Pages if it refused to delete descriptions of marijuana paraphernalia, Wikipediocracy's Twitter feed was the source credited by The Daily Dot to document the suppression of marijuana "inhalation devices" by editors of the Russian Misplaced Pages description.
The involvement of Wikipediocracy members in criticism of Misplaced Pages has been discussed by news stories covering Jimmy Wales's relationship with the government of Kazakhstan and the Gibraltarpedia controversy.
Wikimedia Foundation
A Wikipediocracy blog post reported on what appeared to be persistent vandalism to Misplaced Pages from IP addresses owned by the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF). Responding to the allegations, WMF spokesman Jay Walsh told Daily Dot reporter Kevin Morris that the IP addresses did not belong to the Foundation office but to the Foundation servers for the Wikimedia projects. He stated that the addresses were assigned to some edits due to a misconfiguration. Morris tested Walsh's contention and found that it seemed to be accurate.
Domain ownership
Gregory Kohs, owner of MyWikiBiz, is a contributor to Wikipediocracy and owns the domain registration for Wikipediocracy.com.
See also
References
- "wikipediocracy.com info". alexa.com. Retrieved 25 May 2013.
- "Wikipediocracy". Retrieved 19 May 2013.
- ^ Morris, Kevin (23 April 2013). "Misplaced Pages says its staffers are not vandalizing Misplaced Pages". The Daily Dot. Retrieved 24 May 2013.
- Morris, Kevin (1 January 2013). "After a half-decade, massive Misplaced Pages hoax finally exposed". The Daily Dot. Retrieved 18 May 2013.
- ^ Nichols, Martha; Berry, Lorraine (May 20, 2013). "What Should We Do About Misplaced Pages?". Talking Writing. Retrieved 20 May 2013.
- ^ Leonard, Andrew (17 May 2013). "Revenge, ego and the corruption of Misplaced Pages". Salon.com. Retrieved 18 May 2013.
- Morris, Kevin (9 April 2013). "The Daily Dot - Misplaced Pages pot article loses bongs, gets OK'd in Russia". The Daily Dot. Retrieved 18 May 2013.
- Morris, Kevin (25 December 2012). "The Daily Dot - Misplaced Pages's odd relationship with the Kazakh dictatorship". The Daily Dot. Retrieved 18 May 2013.
- Alfonso, Fernando (25 October 2012). "The Daily Dot - Misplaced Pages's Jimmy Wales breaks silence on resurgence of influence-peddling scandal". The Daily Dot. Retrieved 18 May 2013.
- Orlowski, Andrew (26 October 2012). "Wales: Let's ban Gibraltar-crazy Wikipedians for 5 years". The Register. Retrieved 19 May 2013.
- Hogsky, Roger. "Busy day at the Wikimedia Foundation office?". Retrieved 24 May 2013.
- "Announcing a new Misplaced Pages criticism site | Wikipediocracy". Wikipediocracy. Retrieved 19 May 2013.
- Kohs, Gregory. "Cover-up begins in Misplaced Pages's Gibraltar scandal". Wikipediocracy. Retrieved 21 May 2013.