Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 14:55, 29 May 2006

Misplaced Pages IRC channel:

Services Link:

Others: society -- religion -- studies -- research -- ap -- asa -- terminology -- emo

Controversy header good idea

Hey, good idea putting a controversy header on the election "controversy" page. Zen Master 17:15, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)

FWIW

I liked your original reply on the VfD page better.  :-) Baylink 19:48, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

THANKS!!

I did not have a chance to see what you were doing yesterday (nor have I taken a look yet today) but I was very impressed with the effort you were putting into this. Your process of collecting the consensus votes and working through the complete article, while at the same time posting to the talk page your progress to keep the antsy members of the contributing group abreast of your progress, seems to me to be a particularly appropriate form of agressive mediation; something I believe this article/dispute has been in need of.

While I cannot offer an appropriate reward, please know that your efforts have been noticed and strongly appreciated!

- Amgine 17:30, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I would like to second this, reviewing the summary I constructed for the text, it seems like you spent a great deal of effort over this. CheeseDreams 22:08, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Zoophilia reconstruction

I am new here so please let me know if I am posting inappropriately.

I would like to comment upon the work that FT2 has done regarding the neutrality of the zoophilia article. I have come to expect Misplaced Pages to be a RELIABLE source of information with VERIFIABLE content. I would still like to see the appearance of references and links to peer-reviewed psychological and zoological references. However the wildly POV aspect of the original article has been well toned down and FT2 is close to a neutral discussion. Personally I find the whole subject distasteful but have had to study it from a psychoanlytic POV and therefore appreciate the efforts of FT2.

Thank you. --kaijura 21:53, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hiya. Thank you. We try. The harder a topic is, the more important it is to add balance and reliability, but thats not always easy either. A lot of people added work, and much of the balance was due to others.

A historic version of the page, with research quotes (Jan 2005), can be found here. I think that'll be what you are after. It contains a lot of peer review info of the kind you might be after, which turned up when I was originally researching it myself. The research was later removed from the article due to size constrictions. FT2 04:51, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)

Hi, I would just like to point you to the discussion page on the zoophilia article regarding the religious perspectives section.

comparing/contrasting Judaism/Christianity

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I value many of the changes you have recently made to this article. And I want to apologize for having been overzealous in reverting some of your earlier changes. I know that in one case you were — as far as my research shows — wrong about one of your edits, concerning killing in self-defense. But in reverting that I reverted other changes of yours. I am sure that as I continue to work on this article there will be times when I revert or edit other contributions you have or will have ade to the article. But please know that I will be more careful in the future, to make changes more judiciously. I think several of your recent edits have really improved the article, and I want you to know that I acknowledge that, Slrubenstein | Talk 10:45, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for "about Misplaced Pages".

What the headline says. I was checking the aftermath of the Ciz war for unknown and probably masochistic reasons, was glad to see that you hadn't been driven off by it and more so when I found those few well-fritten lines. I'll have to add it to my quote list... if I ever get one. --Kizor 21:15, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

hello

Just to say that I think the work you do on here is interesting. (let me see if I remember how to sign this thing with the tildes) Saudade7 20:43, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

NPOV Cite

"Misplaced Pages does not exist to determine truth. It is not our purpose to decide if NLP's claims are true or not. It is instead our purpose to fairly represent both NLP's claims and the claims of its critics. The purpose of consensus within Misplaced Pages is not to determine truth, but to determine the wording of articles. Nobody needs to modify their personal views in order to achieve consensus on the wording of the article. However, anyone who is not committed to Misplaced Pages's core principles is likely to be more concerned with hammering their viewpoint than they are with agreeing upon wording which fairly represents all side." user:Jdavidb

Gender Differences

Loved your response at the Science Helpdesk on a thread that was moving in a troubling direction.

That is all. --Ginkgo100 03:31, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

thanks

Thanks for the help on the science helpdesk and the link to Last_universal_ancestor. You rule!! Do you have a LiveJournal or website?--Sonjaaa 04:17, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages 0.5

Hi FT2,

As you may have seen, Misplaced Pages 0.5 (the test release before WP:1.0) is now up & running, and accepting nominations. That is of course great news, but right now nominated articles are building up much faster than the reviewers can review them. Can you help us clear the backlog by joining the term of reviewers? We are judging whether articles should be included in this test CD version - since it is fairly small (2-500 articles?) we have to limit it to article of both quality and importance, as described here. You can probably focus on articles in your area of interest. Do you have time to help out? Thanks, Walkerma 16:39, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Animal pornography

Sorry for replying you that late. I guess it is a bit early to construct a separate "animal pornography" article. However, if user contribution reaches a considerable amount (which is very limited presently) at the Pornography section in the article Zoophilia, this may well be created. I think the issue is incipient by now. I also think that it should be named as "Bestiality pornography" because although it is certain that this is not an appropriate naming, it is the most used generic name. By the way, Club Seventeen is not Danish but Dutch, so I corrected this info. Best Regards. Behemoth 14:47, 28 May 2006 (UTC) Also, Club Seventeen is not a company but a label of the company Video Art Holland, I edited accordingly. Behemoth 14:52, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

cultural and historical background

Please comment here . Please review the recent edit history of the article. I did not think that using BCE and CE would be offensive to Christians, and the fact is the article has used these twerms for years. Moreove, I didn't think identifying the article as relevant to Jewish articles would be offensive to Christians. Ithink along with me you probably put the most work into this article. If I am right that we had achieved (after a lot of struggle) a very stable consensus, you were part of that, and should comment. I appreciate your help, Slrubenstein | Talk 14:55, 29 May 2006 (UTC)