| Revision as of 06:03, 1 June 2013 editNorthBySouthBaranof (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers33,475 edits →...this is why.: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:45, 2 June 2013 edit undoKudpung (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors109,129 edits Warning: Edit warring on The Alex Jones Show. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
| is literally the only reason anyone would call Barack Obama a "mulatto" - it's linked to ] that claim Barack Obama isn't rightfully the president. Misplaced Pages is not required to give such whackjobbery even the slightest hint of an opportunity to make virulently-racist claims on its pages. The end. ] (]) 06:03, 1 June 2013 (UTC) | is literally the only reason anyone would call Barack Obama a "mulatto" - it's linked to ] that claim Barack Obama isn't rightfully the president. Misplaced Pages is not required to give such whackjobbery even the slightest hint of an opportunity to make virulently-racist claims on its pages. The end. ] (]) 06:03, 1 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == June 2013 == | |||
| ] Hello, and ]. You appear to be engaged in an ] with one or more editors  according to your reverts at ]. Although repeatedly ] another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the ], and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a ] on the ]. | |||
| If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be ]. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> ] (]) 03:45, 2 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:45, 2 June 2013
Welcome
|
May 2013
Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to 2013 Woolwich attack, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, — MusikAnimal 20:47, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Amy's Baking Company
Hey, Rocket. A belated WELCOME to Misplaced Pages! Regarding your addition of info on the 2010 incident to the Amy's Baking Company (TV episode) article, if that is reason that the owners decided to appear on Kitchen Nightmares, as you stated here, please provide a citation of a reliable source for this. Without such a citation, the material has no apparent relevance to the article about the episode. Nightscream (talk) 17:58, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
...this is why.
This is literally the only reason anyone would call Barack Obama a "mulatto" - it's linked to lunatic conspiracy theories that claim Barack Obama isn't rightfully the president. Misplaced Pages is not required to give such whackjobbery even the slightest hint of an opportunity to make virulently-racist claims on its pages. The end. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 06:03, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
June 2013
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at The Alex Jones Show. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:45, 2 June 2013 (UTC)