Misplaced Pages

Talk:Chanakya: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:49, 4 June 2013 editNeo. (talk | contribs)2,253 edits Reliable source: H.V. Glasenapp: fix← Previous edit Revision as of 18:31, 4 June 2013 edit undoRahul RJ Jain (talk | contribs)1,193 edits Reliable source: H.V. GlasenappNext edit →
Line 118: Line 118:
I have added another source in support of the claim. This is '''Jainism: The world of conquerors''' by '''Natubhai Shah''' from the same publisher. I hope two published books would be sufficient for the claim. ] (]) 14:50, 4 June 2013 (UTC) I have added another source in support of the claim. This is '''Jainism: The world of conquerors''' by '''Natubhai Shah''' from the same publisher. I hope two published books would be sufficient for the claim. ] (]) 14:50, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
:Your surname 'Jain' suggest that ] is involved in giving religion of Chanakya as ]. Sources given by you are not accessible and I never heard of these authors. Various sources claim different religions of Chanakya. source claim his religion as ] and these sources claim that he was born in ] family and had studied ] of ]. This very talkpage templates suggest that this article is part of Hinduism. Due to conflicting sources it is better to leave his religion field blank. ] (]) 15:44, 4 June 2013 (UTC) :Your surname 'Jain' suggest that ] is involved in giving religion of Chanakya as ]. Sources given by you are not accessible and I never heard of these authors. Various sources claim different religions of Chanakya. source claim his religion as ] and these sources claim that he was born in ] family and had studied ] of ]. This very talkpage templates suggest that this article is part of Hinduism. Due to conflicting sources it is better to leave his religion field blank. ] (]) 15:44, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

::The sources I gave are published sources. Helmuth Von Glasenapp is a known west-German Indologist. He taught at the ''University of Königsberg'' and occupied the indological chair of the ''University of Tübingen''. Motilal Banarasidass publishers is a leading Indian publishing house on Sanskrit and Indology. You point to online pages and blogs which clearly do not meet the criteria.

::*''indiavideo.org'': This one is owned by Invis Multimedia Pvt. Ltd. which is a digital marketing and multimedia solutions company. What makes it a reliable source?
::*''www.studymode.com'': This one is a college essay.
::*''www.hinduism.co.za'': A hinduism-propogating website.
::*''www.patheos.com'': I would request you to go through this site once more.
::*''thehinduismblog.com'':Not only its a self published blog, the only four lines it has does not deal with his religious identity.

::Please see ], especially ] and provide reliable sources which conflicts the claim. If a conflict does exist, I have absolutely no problem giving each claim their ]. ] (]) 18:31, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:31, 4 June 2013

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconBiography: Science and Academia
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconIndia: History Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconHinduism Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconJainism Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Jainism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Jainism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconPhilosophy: Philosophers / Social and political / Eastern / Ancient Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Misplaced Pages.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Philosophers
Taskforce icon
Social and political philosophy
Taskforce icon
Eastern philosophy
Taskforce icon
Ancient philosophy
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconPolitics Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
It is requested that an image or photograph of Chanakya be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.
Upload

Content and style

This is a very flimsy article. If you compare it to the Machiavelli piece - which links to it - it's disgracefully thin on Chanakya's philosophy and writings. I'm no expert, sadly, but can anyone make it slightly more intellectually credible? -- TinaSparkle 19:31, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

---

Where does the second paragraph come from? It seems like somebody got carried away with the whole Chanakya thing.

Subject:- Chanakya is like "Indian Machiavelli" What do you mean by that. The great chanakya borned much earlier than Machiavelli (not even heard). The work , the culture Chanakya followed and his contribution to Bharat (India) is much much important and greater than Machiavelli.

Request you to modify this word in this article.

Name

His name is Vishnu Gupta, he was called 'Chanakya' as his father's name was Chanak. 'Kautaliya' was derived from 'Kutil' which in english would translate to shrewd.

Nehru's description of Chanakya

Even though Nehru's desciption of Chanakya is mentioned, the text following is very different from what Nehru has written.

The timing mentioned about Sun-Tzu in this article, around 3-century BC, is different from that mentioned in the article http://en.wikipedia.org/Sun-Tzu ... some other books say Sun-Tzu is around 6-century BC... please correct.

Amar Chitra Katha

The Amar chitra KAtha series has a book on Chanakya's story more accurate and interesting than the one provided. I will try to revamp section soon.Bakaman Bakatalk 02:06, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

It would be more encyclopedic to detail the differences between various versions of the Chanakya legend as they appear in different primary sources (i.e. the Parishista Parvan version, the Pali version, etc.) instead of presenting a single version from, well, a comic book.
My source was Thomas Trautmann's Kautilya and the Arthashastra. He gives fairly complete accounts of the Parishista Parvan version and the Pali version, a very different Kashmiri version, and the Mudrarakshasa.
Hemachandra and the Pali version give two different birthplaces and the Misplaced Pages article initially gave another. The article must acknowledge the differing versions rather than pretend they all agree.
CiteCop 02:44, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Country?

No where in this article does it reference where he lived, was born or what nationality he is. Maybe this would be good to put in the introduction NinjaKid 15:20, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Magadha Rajya, India

He was definitely from India. An acquaintance from India tells me that he lived in the time of the Macedonian Alexander's invasion, and at least attempted to unite India against that invasion. If this is true, the article needs some more editing.

Date of death - article contradicts itself

The date of his death is mentioned as 283 BC at the beginning and 293 BC somewhere in between. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.37.19.80 (talk) 16:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 03:50, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Eurocentric sobriquets for Indian entities

Telugu: The Italian of the East
Chanakya: The Indian Machiavelli
Samudragupta: The Napolean of India

We don't need such nonsensical Euro chauvinist sobriquets and titles for our entities. What about calling Italian as the 'Telugu of the West'? Maquahuitl 09:17, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

I have changed the language.--ÆN↑Þƺ§®»Ŧ 16:47, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
And By the way, while the term "Indian Machiavelli" has a reference as the title of a book, I have kept it. The other two: "The Italian of the East" and "Napolean of India" are just idiotic and ridiculous.--ÆN↑Þƺ§®»Ŧ 16:47, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Correct Spelling

We need to switch to the correct spelling of "Arthaśāstra." Lotus (talk) 17:20, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Anachronistic language

Please try and avoid anachronistic language and remove words such as "professor" and "university". Though these serve to describe it its not historio-ideographically correct and undermines the objectivity of an elsewise very intesting article. Scholar, for example, is also an honorific and positive-laden term whereas professor(see wikipedia article under same name) is connected with a concerete historical and institutional development.

Thesaurus of Chanakya

Chanakya wrote two thesaurus in his life time. The first one is the "Chanakya Niti Sutra" which contains one or two lines sayings which means the people and the king should behave in that particular manor. n. The another was "Kautilya Arth-Shastra" in that he described how to run an empire,in that he explained briefly about cabinet and its members, rolls of them and how to track all them. If a person wants to succeed in politics must have to study it.In that he described how to divert mass in our favor.

Balance

This source looks like a good place to start Glenn, John; Howlett, Darryl A.; Poore, Stuart (2004-04). Neorealism versus strategic culture. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. pp. 89–. ISBN 9780754613794. Retrieved 20 August 2010. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |date= (help).J8079s (talk) 20:02, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

reading a little more the contents (of "Arthaśāstra") need to be summarized better.J8079s (talk) 20:08, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
This page needs some work I want to tag it but I can't seem to find the right tag. sourceSingh, Upinder (2009-02-25). A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th Century. Pearson Education India. p. 323. ISBN 9788131711200. Retrieved 4 October 2010. J8079s (talk) 20:47, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Photo of chanakya

http://www.myads.org/chanakya/chanakya.gif

this is a good photo of chankaya — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aujas Bandlish (talkcontribs) 14:50, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Chanakya painting.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Chanakya painting.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Misplaced Pages (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Chanakya painting.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 05:50, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Buddhist version..?

It is true that Mahavamsa is written in Pali language. But I cannot accept Mahavamsa as a "Buddhist" source. Mahavamsa was written with a political interest in mind and it is a history book, not directly related to Buddhism. It is the history of Sinhalese nation, and there are strong ties with Buddhism in it. But Mahavamsa does not contain the Dharma of Buddhism.

Vishvax (talk) 17:10, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Reliable source: H.V. Glasenapp

The source that I used to support my claim was Jainism by Helmuth Von Glasenapp publisher Motilal Banarasidass. As far as I know, it is a reliable source. My claim was reverted recently. I am changing it again. I request that it be pointed out why the source is being considered unreliable. Thanks Rahul Jain (talk) 14:42, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

I have added another source in support of the claim. This is Jainism: The world of conquerors by Natubhai Shah from the same publisher. I hope two published books would be sufficient for the claim. Rahul Jain (talk) 14:50, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Your surname 'Jain' suggest that WP:COI is involved in giving religion of Chanakya as Jainism. Sources given by you are not accessible and I never heard of these authors. Various sources claim different religions of Chanakya. this source claim his religion as Zoroastrianism and these sources claim that he was born in Brahmin family and had studied Vedas of Hinduism. This very talkpage templates suggest that this article is part of Hinduism. Due to conflicting sources it is better to leave his religion field blank. neo (talk) 15:44, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
The sources I gave are published sources. Helmuth Von Glasenapp is a known west-German Indologist. He taught at the University of Königsberg and occupied the indological chair of the University of Tübingen. Motilal Banarasidass publishers is a leading Indian publishing house on Sanskrit and Indology. You point to online pages and blogs which clearly do not meet the criteria.
  • indiavideo.org: This one is owned by Invis Multimedia Pvt. Ltd. which is a digital marketing and multimedia solutions company. What makes it a reliable source?
  • www.studymode.com: This one is a college essay.
  • www.hinduism.co.za: A hinduism-propogating website.
  • www.patheos.com: I would request you to go through this site once more.
  • thehinduismblog.com:Not only its a self published blog, the only four lines it has does not deal with his religious identity.
Please see WP:RS, especially WP:SPS and provide reliable sources which conflicts the claim. If a conflict does exist, I have absolutely no problem giving each claim their due weight. Rahul Jain (talk) 18:31, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Categories: