Misplaced Pages

User talk:Ryulong: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:25, 11 July 2013 view sourceChrisGualtieri (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers457,369 edits →Rollback: re← Previous edit Revision as of 17:34, 11 July 2013 view source Ryulong (talk | contribs)218,132 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 106: Line 106:
::Not needed. There are roughly 350 non-admins with filemover capability who would not likely see it there and are more likely to see it if the template is used. ] (]) 20:36, 8 July 2013 (UTC) ::Not needed. There are roughly 350 non-admins with filemover capability who would not likely see it there and are more likely to see it if the template is used. ] (]) 20:36, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
:::I see. It seems silly.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="Gold">琉竜</font>) 04:14, 9 July 2013 (UTC) :::I see. It seems silly.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="Gold">琉竜</font>) 04:14, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

== Rollback ==

Please use rollback properly, you do not seem to be doing so with edits like these:. All within a short span of time. You are all but obligated to explain your actions. The Venture Bros one seems to be among the most problematic one - you even reverted the summary added - without explanation. ] (]) 16:09, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
:The added summaries are copyright violations. Blossman is at AFD and the entry was added by someone with a COI to add her to the project in the first place. Precure is unsourced edits despite discussions in various places not to include the information. Don't police me over such minor bullshit.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="Gold">琉竜</font>) 16:15, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
:: That does not excuse your use of rollback because it is not a case of obvious vandalism and the reason is not absolutely clear. The information you are telling me should have been in your edit summary. I shouldn't see a bunch of "reverted" without reason again - especially when first appearances are that it is a good faith addition. And I just took three that I personally know of because of my interest in YEARS, ANIME and a minor liking of Venture Bros. I am not "policing" you, but abuse of the tool can lead to revoking of it. ] (]) 16:25, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:34, 11 July 2013

Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page by using either the "new section" tab or this link.
Please sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). If you do not sign your comments, I may remove them entirely.
Please keep your comments short and to the point. I do not want to read essays on this page.
I will revert and ignore any basic template messages used on my talk page. If you want to talk to me, use your own words.
I prefer to keep conversations on one page. If I left a message for you on your user talk page, I prefer to respond to you there.
My local time: December 2024 25 Wednesday 1:17 pm EST
Archives
  1. 2—6/06
  2. 7/06
  3. 8/06
  4. 9/06
  5. 10/06
  6. 11/06
  7. 12/06
  8. 1/07
  9. 2/07
  10. 3/07
  11. 4/07
  12. 5/07
  13. 6/07
  14. 7/07
  15. 8/07
  16. 9/07
  17. 10/07
  18. 11/07
  19. 12/07
  20. 1/08
  21. 2/08
  22. 3/08
  23. 4/08
  24. 5/08
  25. 6/08
  26. 7/08
  27. 8/08
  28. 9/08
  29. 10/08
  30. 11/08
  31. 12/08
  32. 1/09
  33. 2/09
  34. 3/09
  35. 4/09
  36. 5/09
  37. 6/09
  38. 7/09
  39. 8/09
  40. 9/09
  41. 10/09
  42. 11/09
  43. 12/09
  44. 1/10
  45. 2/10
  46. 3/10
  47. 4/10
  48. 5/10
  49. 6/10
  50. 7/10
  51. 8/10
  52. 9/10
  53. 10/10
  54. 11/10
  55. 12/10
  56. 1/11
  57. 2/11
  58. 3/11
  59. 4/11
  60. 5/11
  61. 6/11
  62. 7/11
  63. 8/11
  64. 9/11
  65. 10/11
  66. 11/11
  67. 12/11
  68. 1/12
  69. 2/12
  70. 3/12
  71. 4/12
  72. 5/12
  73. 6/12
  74. 7/12
  75. 8/12
  76. 9/12
  77. 10/12
  78. 11/12
  79. 12/12
  80. 1/13
  81. 2/13
  82. 3/13
  83. 4/13
  84. 5/13
  85. 6/13
  86. 7/13
  87. 8/13
  88. 9/13
  89. 10/13
  90. 11/13
  91. 12/13
  92. 1/14
  93. 2/14
  94. 3/14
  95. 4/14
  96. 5/14
  97. 6/14
  98. 7/14
  99. 8/14
  100. 9/14
  101. 10/14
  102. 11/14
  103. 12/14
  104. 1/15

When I find that the conversations or issues discussed here have either ended or resolved, they will be inserted into my archives at my own discretion.—Ryūlóng


Basco ta Jolokia

This screenshot from the show proves that that Figuarts packaging is wrong. Sorry, but it is Basco, not Vasco. http://images.wikia.com/powerrangers/images/a/ab/Sentainame-Basco_and_Sally.png Digifiend (talk) 13:36, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Names change. The latest name is "Vasco".—Ryulong (琉竜) 13:38, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Rating Reverting

Why did you revert all of the ratings I added for Consequence of Sound? They are a major online music publication and have most of their reviews' ratings added to specific albums' pages. Also, where is the information regarding this "11th review" rule?—User:Zanderporter 01:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

See MOS:ALBUM#Album ratings template. "Include no more than ten reviews in table form."—Ryulong (琉竜) 01:54, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Okay, I see that. What about all the other ones you reverted that don't have anything to do with being an 11th addition? Why can't I go and undo those?—User:Zanderporter 01:59, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
First, stop copying my signature. Just type ~~~~ and then save (do not copy the "nowiki" things when you do) and that's how you write in your signature because you're not doing it with time stamps. Second, Consequence of Sound was not used before so why are you making it used now?—Ryulong (琉竜) 02:08, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Apologies; still learning things. What do you mean Consequence of Sound was not used before? Ratings aren't all posted at the same exact time. I'm a new intern at the website and I'm supposed to add Consequence of Sound's album ratings to Wiki pages. I don't see why additions that aren't the "11th" should be reverted. Zander Porter (talk) 02:10, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
I see the issue now. I am afraid I have to direct you to Misplaced Pages's conflict of interest policy. It is best if you do not attempt to promote CoS on Misplaced Pages, particularly if it is your job.—Ryulong (琉竜) 02:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Okay, I understand that too now. However, how would one ever go about adding Consequence of Sound's album ratings to any pages without running into 100 conflicts? Zander Porter (talk) 02:22, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Not be affiliated with the blog I guess. I think it might be fine for the albums that aren't yet at 10 reviews but your conflict of interest raises issues still.—Ryulong (琉竜) 02:53, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Either way, I'm contributing to Misplaced Pages. And although I'm new, I'm pretty sure that's its main purpose? It's hard to get involved at all when newbies are so often struck down like this. Although it does provide helpful information. So thank you. Would it be awful to ask that you undo your reverting of the albums you reverted my edits of recently? Zander Porter (talk) 02:57, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
So long as you're not adding CoS as the 11th entry then you can revert me. I have a meeting in a bit so I don't know what to fix.—Ryulong (琉竜) 05:29, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. Zander Porter (talk) 06:42, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

I understand why you posted the "Conflict of Interest" to my talk page, but it mentions distorted views, which posting ratings wouldn't include, as they are only direct references to a website, and they're cited. Zander Porter (talk) 18:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Are you doing a paid internship or are they harnessing your labor for free?—Ryulong (琉竜) 18:36, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Why is that important? Zander Porter (talk) 18:42, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
It just is.—Ryulong (琉竜) 18:43, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Ban vs Block

Just a short note. I noticed you made a reference to User:Lucasmoura as being banned. That is incorrect. The user is blocked, in this case indefinitely. There is a difference between a WP:BAN and a WP:BLOCK, so that you know. -- Alexf 17:24, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

When someone is indefinitely blocked to where no one in their right mind will listen to any unblock requests, as has happened with Lucasmoura, then that means he is de facto banned from the project. The fact that he is consistently coming back and disrupting things because he has not gotten his way is just detracting from him ever returning so why make the technical distinction?—Ryulong (琉竜) 17:25, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
You may be correct in what you say, but I just wanted to make the distinction as they are technically and functionally different, from a WP point of view. -- Alexf 17:36, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
The latter tends to evolve into the former very fluidly though.—Ryulong (琉竜) 17:37, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Maybe so, but to close, let's try to use the correct name whenever referring to someone so as not to confuse the issue. Cheers. -- Alexf 17:41, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
I'd rather he be banned than indef blocked though.—Ryulong (琉竜) 17:42, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
I'd rather you be neither. Keep up your good work. -- Alexf 17:53, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Dispute resolution noticeboard

My apology, I thought that User talk:MugsWrit was referring to being listed as a sock multiple times and suggested taking it to dispute resolution. Sorry for the hassle. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 19:44, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

No problem.—Ryulong (琉竜) 02:50, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

SM

Since the Shiroi Mahoutsukai is now officially declared a Rider and his identity has been revealed, I think that the Shiroi Mahoutsukai article should be recreated or at least have one made in a later time when more is revealed on him in the later episodes. ~Switch On 2012~ ( ★ AlienX2009 ★ ) 21:41, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

There are all of 8 episodes left in the show so no. I saw what you did with the Birth Proto Type article too and I am disappointed that you actually went through with it after I told you no, again.—Ryulong (琉竜) 23:59, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Reversions of ratings

Why have you reverted my TV ratings information? They're all verified as official.MB MrTV (talk) 05:31, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

There's absolutely no reason for you to replace Zap2It, which is a reliable source, with a website that you have been personally promoting because you are obviously the author of the articles you've been posting.—Ryulong (琉竜) 05:32, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Zap2It is one reliable source. FYI, so is our website which often refers to more detailed ratings data. I have verified all these numbers from Nielsen itself. MB MrTV (talk) 05:38, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
You're not allowed to promote your own work on Misplaced Pages, particularly because TVMediaInsights is not a reliable source.—Ryulong (琉竜) 05:38, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Our interest is in providing ratings. I advise you to check ALL the ratings that TVMI posts. ALL valid. Its site owner has been reporting ratings for more than a decade - prior to others' sites. I assure you we're not spam. TV Media Insights is a legitimate website. MB MrTV (talk) 05:49, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Then why is it that you're replacing legitimate TV By the Numbers sources with those of your own, just because you have found a different number than reported by a vetted source?—Ryulong (琉竜) 05:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
They're actually not a "different number." Our numbers state the number of millions more exactly. Other websites round off the figure. TV Media Insights is vetted as anyone else and accesses the same Nielsen data but with more detailed info.MB MrTV (talk) 05:55, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
I seriously doubt that. Don't insert your website or your publications onto Misplaced Pages, again, please.—Ryulong (琉竜) 05:56, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Why the "doubt"? TV Media Insights is a legitimate website; not spam. Our site's owner has been oft mentioned by what you deemed as the "vetted" Zap2it -- look at the "Jensen Project" section at http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2010/07/17/tv-ratings-abc-unscripted-tops-friday-jensen-doesnt-project-well/57354/ "TV Ratings: ABC Unscripted tops Friday; Jensen Doesn’t Project Well"
Also, a year later: http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2011/09/17/tv-ratings-friday-dateline-again-leads-nbc-win-karaoke-battle-usa-finishes-down/103996/
You cannot use "You're not allowed to promote your own work on Misplaced Pages" as an argument. All Zap2it references on Wiki occur immediately after they're posted on Zap2it because their workers post them here. It's all the same data, Ryulong. MB MrTV (talk) 06:29, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
I doubt that Zap2It references are added to Misplaced Pages by people who work at the website, unlike yourself.—Ryulong (琉竜) 06:35, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
And you have no proof behind this doubt. Is Zap2it the ONLY Nielsen ratings provider online? No, but being omnipresent on Wiki was their strategy to make it seem as such. MB MrTV (talk) 06:48, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
That doesn't excuse you from flooding articles with links to your website and replacing Zap2it links with those of your own authorship.—Ryulong (琉竜) 06:49, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
You seem like a passionate Wiki user so I won't further this debate after these statements since we'll forever be at a stalemate. The reason for the Misplaced Pages input was they were not regurgitations of other TV sites' information. They were enhanced versions of Nielsen data. That was all. Sorry you believed otherwise. MB MrTV (talk) 07:02, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
You still need to be aware of WP:COI.—Ryulong (琉竜) 07:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The No Spam Barnstar
Great job fighting spam from a user who is clearly self-promoting his website! Logical Fuzz (talk) 06:30, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Hey

Whoever supressed that sock's edit to my talk page might want to do the same to the edit summary of the person reverting him.—Ryulong (琉竜) 19:40, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Also it would help checkusers to provide the changed username.—Ryulong (琉竜) 19:44, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Title Move Discussion

I have opened up discussion at Talk:Enthronement of the Japanese Emperor#Title Move Discussion. You are invited to provide your opinion in the interest of consensus. Boneyard90 (talk) 14:07, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Season Tsuu

I never heard about the change to "Season Tsuu" instead of "Season Two" for Hikonin Sentai Akibaranger. Might I ask, before I (stupidly) revert the edit why the change was made?— Preceding unsigned comment added by KenYokai (talk • contribs) 17:16, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Official spelling and if I institute a spelling change you better fucking accept it as having a damn good reason.—Ryulong (琉竜) 17:15, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
I will! I just didn't know about it! & I didn't know you did it until I was about to revert it (which I luckily did not)— Preceding unsigned comment added by KenYokai (talk • contribs) 17:17, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
And please sign your posts by typing four tildes. If your signature does not have a link in it then this is also a problem (I have my signature set up to not link when on my own user talk).—Ryulong (琉竜) 17:18, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Usavich

In your edit to Usavich The edit summary was: JS: Replacing "Comaneci" with "Komanetsyn". JS: Replacing "Comăneci" with "Komanetsyn". The edit actually removed all the details of the different seasons and episodes removing 90% of the article. Was that intentional?--Salix (talk): 18:06, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Yes. The article shouldn't be 90% episode list and summary anyway.—Ryulong (琉竜) 18:06, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

You're being rude, agressive and unreasonable

This is my edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Dokidoki!_PreCure&diff=563213366&oldid=563190003 Yet you commented in the history page that "YOU CHANGED ACE TO TRUMP CARD TOO WHY ARE YOU ALL SO DAMN DENSE AND STRICT WITH THE STUPID FANSUBS" (, in caps) and in my talk page that I "blatantly ignored the request to not translate kirifuda as "trump card". There is no reason to use this extremely strict translation of kirifuda. No one in English uses the phrase "trump card" anymore". First of all, I did not touch on Ace's section. Secondly, we never talked to each other about this kirifuda matter. How did you come to the conclusion that it was me who ignored you and just write whatever I want? Thirdly, I can read Japanese for the records, I do not know what kind of fansub there are, and how you arrived at the idea that I edit the Dokidoki! Precure page based on those. Jumping to conclusion much? You're being exceedingly rude and agressive about nothing. You're trying to monopolize all the editing on the Precure wikis like some sort of police and drive away contributors. I'm sick and tired of people like you, who thinks he is better than anyone and get agressive whenever somebody does something not the way you want. Take a deep breath, dude. If you do not apologize, which I think is exactly what you won't do anyway, I'll report this matter. Agressive people should not be tolerated in any community. Saluki.N (talk) 17:30, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

You are right. You did not add the change from "ace" to "trump card". I apologize for accusing you of such. And my only goal for these pages is that they are properly sourced and attributed rather than people just posting their ideas and whatever rumors they have heard as has happened in the past.—Ryulong (琉竜) 17:32, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

File moves

The reason that {{Rename media}} is valuable is that it is a completely different type of move from an article renaming, and not only admins, but anyone with the filemover capability can do the move. It is a specialized type of move, and adding the template puts the request into that category where those with the filemove ability can take care of it. Placing it at RM may mean that it is un-noticed by that group of editors. Apteva (talk) 19:15, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

But if it can be done by admins why not list it at RMTM?—Ryulong (琉竜) 19:16, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Not needed. There are roughly 350 non-admins with filemover capability who would not likely see it there and are more likely to see it if the template is used. Apteva (talk) 20:36, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
I see. It seems silly.—Ryulong (琉竜) 04:14, 9 July 2013 (UTC)