| Revision as of 20:48, 6 July 2006 editJossi (talk | contribs)72,880 edits →Where was the Request for comment?← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 05:14, 14 July 2013 edit undoThebirdlover (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers4,358 edits Redirecting per Fastily's reason for unprotection | ||
| (60 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| I'm not doing this. I have no confidence whatsoever in Misplaced Pages's brand of justice and I know that the end result of arbitration will be my departure, so I'm just going to walk away right now. Misplaced Pages just isn't worth it. It's not fair enough to deserve my time and trouble. Please remove my account, I won't be back. You "win". ] 19:02, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't know, Al. I've seen some positive indications, even if arbitration were to continue. Fred changed his vote, and Charles seems . A number of us have put time and effort into supporting you, in the hopes that you would be able to continue here. I'd like to see how things go. In addition, Sophia has indicated that she will leave as well if you were to go. I'd also like to see that your concerns aired. Regardless of the eventual outcome, that would be a positive thing in itself. ] 19:27, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't believe that the end result of the arbitration will be your departure. On the contrary, it will give you a chance to become a better editor so that you and the community can be proud of. You are a very intelligent person, and could be an asset to this project if you could listen to what the community has to say about some of your behaviors. Trusting the "system" in this case may be a decision that you may not regret. ] <small>] • ]</small> 19:38, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Jossi and James are right. Please stay and participate. -] 19:55, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::We have disagreed on occasion, Al, but I for one don't want you to leave. You have a lot to contribute. Please do not leave. I don't believe that the arbcom is in any danger of banning you. All they may do is analyse your behaviour and give you their analysis. ]]\<sup><font color="blue">]</font></sup> 20:10, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::We've disagreed on practically ''every'' occasion, and I don't want you to leave either. Punishment isn't the spirit of Misplaced Pages. Understand why what you're doing is upsetting people and try to avoid doing it, and there's no reason for the AC to do anything major. Don't go. Learn and change. I did. (Lengthier comment sent by email.) ] 20:18, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Al, I've been following (but not commenting on) this process. You're a valuable and helpful editor, and I'd hate to see you leave. ] 20:31, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: Go away. == | |||
| I did not realize that the blanking of your talk page was intentional. I assumed that the bug with the Google toolbar and Firefox had hit, reasulting in content being removed. I apologize for reverting against your wishes, but I would reccomend that you at least ] your talk page for reference purposes.--<b>]]<sup>(]ˑ])</sup></b> 19:10, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Where was the Request for comment?== | |||
| For Misplaced Pages to be successful, editors need to feel that they will be treated fairly. | |||
| *A '''request for arbitration''' is the last step of ]. Before requesting arbitration, please review ] you should take. If you do not follow any of these routes, it is highly likely that your request will be rejected. If all other steps have failed, and you see no reasonable chance that the matter can be resolved in another manner, you may request that it be decided by the ] (ArbCom). | |||
| In my opinion bypassing the ] phase of the dispute resolution process '''significantly''' undermines the perception that editors will be treated fairly. -- ] 20:21, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :This is exactly right, and the question of why things are being done this way has been asked ''again and again''. Of course Al feels like he's being mistreated! He is! No one has the decency to follow procedure, and no on has the decency to answer a simple question. And now that he has decided to leave, ''now'' all of those who were moments ago pushing for extreme and speedy punishment come here to ask him to stay? I don't believe this, it is ridiculous. ]]] <small>]]</small> 20:34, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::You may be misinformed. ArbCom cases are not about "punishment" (You may want to read ]. And if you follow the threads, no one was arguing for anything such as an "extreme and speedy punishment", but hoping that Alienus would receive good quality feedback from the community through the ArbComn, so that he may chose to change some of the behaviors observed. ] <small>] • ]</small> 20:48, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 05:14, 14 July 2013
Redirect to: