| Revision as of 17:34, 29 July 2013 editThomas.W (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers60,972 edits Warning: Removal of maintenance templates on Marcos Stupenengo. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:50, 29 July 2013 edit undoThomas.W (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers60,972 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Marcos Stupenengo. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| ] Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to ], without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered ]. Further edits of this type may result in your account being ] from editing. <!-- Template:uw-tdel3 --> ] ] 17:34, 29 July 2013 (UTC) | ] Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to ], without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered ]. Further edits of this type may result in your account being ] from editing. <!-- Template:uw-tdel3 --> ] ] 17:34, 29 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] ] 17:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | ||
Revision as of 17:50, 29 July 2013
July 2013
Hello, I'm Spencer. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Marcos Stupenengo, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Spencer 02:22, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Marcos Stupenengo, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Thomas.W 17:34, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Your recent editing history at Marcos Stupenengo shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Thomas.W 17:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.