| Revision as of 15:27, 27 July 2013 editOmniwore (talk | contribs)23 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:38, 31 July 2013 edit undoOmniwore (talk | contribs)23 edits →= Misplaced Pages is no a place to introduce POVNext edit → | ||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
| == Misplaced Pages is no a place to introduce POV = | == Misplaced Pages is no a place to introduce POV = | ||
| Szczecin was in Slavic land always. That was Germans who changed the name. The fact that the Germans went there at one time means nothing. Before that there were Slavic culture.--] (]) 15:27, 27 July 2013 (UTC) | Szczecin was in Slavic land always. That was Germans who changed the name. The fact that the Germans went there at one time means nothing. Before that there were Slavic culture.--] (]) 15:27, 27 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
| Renamed from foreign name means returned to origin. It is you POV that the German name is important. German post-war propaganda was that the land belong to Germany. And you still follow an idea that the presence of Germany has any meaning. Officially and also on bilateral treaty the border is where it is. You actions is insolent taking for consideration the history of WWII 6 millions of Polish citizens death and lost of Polish territories on East. Poland is 17% smaller than before WWII, and all it is result of war caused by Germans. Thus leave the fact of returning to names to Slavic origin as important fact.--] (]) 17:37, 31 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:38, 31 July 2013
 Archives |
scotty
why did you dillited my edit? The accident was in did in Kaliningrad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ScottyNolan (talk • contribs) 10:38, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Copernicus article
Hello Herkus Monte,
could you have an eye on the Copernicus page. Copernicus birthday seems to have brought out Polish nationalists. I don't like to get in an edit war, so having a second pair of eyes looking at the article is a good thing. I ask you this because I noticed that you have a strong interest in Prussian history are involved in these matters for a long time.
Cheers, Larkusix — Preceding unsigned comment added by Larkusix (talk • contribs) 21:00, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
- Where is consensus about Czesław Miłosz as expert of history and Italian lang. as important for Kopernik page? --Piotr967 (talk) 14:28, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Royal Prussia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marienburg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Nicolaus Copernicus
It is disturbing to see what appears to be a nationalist edit war starting up again at Nicolaus Copernicus. If you believe you have obtained a talk page consensus for your changes at the Copernicus article, please link to it. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:16, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Baysen/Bazynski
Herkus, please see my comments here. Can you provide ANY English language sources to support the name to which you keep moving the article? I'm getting a little tired of raising this point on discussion, only to be ignored for months and years, yet, when I actually make a change it is swiftly reverted within the same day. If you have time to revert and move-war, you should have time to look for sources which actually support the name. And provide them. Thanks. Volunteer Marek 20:36, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Erich Weise
We'had disagreements in the past and all, but I've always had respect for you. But seriously, trying to defend a Nazi archivist who was involved in plunder and war crimes? This is not a fight worth fighting.Volunteer Marek 05:03, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Reverts in Konigsberg
Hi Herkus, could you please explain what was the reason for the revert? I thought the lead in the previous version talked twice about the same moment, i.e. late WW3 events. What was the issue with the new version? Thanks, FeelSunny (talk) 10:31, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, never mind, actually. Now that I noticed Marek and Piotrus frequently messaging you, I see no reasons for any further contacts. Bye. FeelSunny (talk) 10:35, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 22:57, 20 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Yopie (talk) 22:57, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
For you
|
The Civility Barnstar | |
| When dealing with 'The Gang' |
Rsloch (talk) 08:58, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
= Misplaced Pages is no a place to introduce POV
Szczecin was in Slavic land always. That was Germans who changed the name. The fact that the Germans went there at one time means nothing. Before that there were Slavic culture.--Omniwore (talk) 15:27, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Renamed from foreign name means returned to origin. It is you POV that the German name is important. German post-war propaganda was that the land belong to Germany. And you still follow an idea that the presence of Germany has any meaning. Officially and also on bilateral treaty the border is where it is. You actions is insolent taking for consideration the history of WWII 6 millions of Polish citizens death and lost of Polish territories on East. Poland is 17% smaller than before WWII, and all it is result of war caused by Germans. Thus leave the fact of returning to names to Slavic origin as important fact.--Omniwore (talk) 17:37, 31 July 2013 (UTC)