Misplaced Pages

User talk:Avdav: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:10, 1 August 2013 editYerevantsi (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users64,650 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 15:20, 1 August 2013 edit undoAvdav (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers7,391 editsm Edit warringNext edit →
Line 23: Line 23:


== Edit warring == == Edit warring ==

Your recent edits at ] and {{tl|Infobox Armenians}} show that you're enganged in an ]. And announcements like are really counterproductive too. If you don't have time to discuss controversial edits, then please don't make such edits at all. It's as simple as that. You have been asked to discuss the matter at the ANI noticeboard or the relevant talk pages, but you chose not to do so. Please note that all topics related to Armenia (and Azerbaijan) broadly construed may be subject to ] as set out in ] by the Arbitration Committee. The decision there says explicitely that "edit warring is harmful. When disagreements arise, users are expected to discuss their differences rationally rather than reverting ad infinitum." If you keep reverting other editors at these two pages without dicussing the desired change, you will be blocked from editing. ] (]) 14:47, 1 August 2013 (UTC) Your recent edits at ] and {{tl|Infobox Armenians}} show that you're enganged in an ]. And announcements like are really counterproductive too. If you don't have time to discuss controversial edits, then please don't make such edits at all. It's as simple as that. You have been asked to discuss the matter at the ANI noticeboard or the relevant talk pages, but you chose not to do so. Please note that all topics related to Armenia (and Azerbaijan) broadly construed may be subject to ] as set out in ] by the Arbitration Committee. The decision there says explicitely that "edit warring is harmful. When disagreements arise, users are expected to discuss their differences rationally rather than reverting ad infinitum." If you keep reverting other editors at these two pages without dicussing the desired change, you will be blocked from editing. ] (]) 14:47, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
:My intention of editing was related with reducing the amount of notable Armenians, since there is no strictly defined rule which needs to be followed when adding someone to the list. So, I removed less significant (in my opinion) persons. Because hardly someone in the world had ever heard about, f.e. Vazgen Sargsyan. In any case, if this somehow violates policies or is considered as a harmful action, I do express my sincere apologies. ] (]) 14:56, 1 August 2013 (UTC) :My intention of editing was related with reducing the amount of notable Armenians, since there is no strictly defined rule which needs to be followed when adding someone to the list. So, I removed less significant (in my opinion) persons. Because hardly someone in the world had ever heard about, f.e. Vazgen Sargsyan. In any case, if this somehow violates policies or is considered as a harmful action, I do express my sincere apologies. ] (]) 14:56, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
::And what is keeping you away from getting engaged in discussions? If you don't agree with the inclusion of Vazgen Sargsyan, let's discuss it. I don't agree with the inclusion of Vazgen I. Don't you think "hardly someone in the world had ever heard about" also applies to him? --] ] 15:10, 1 August 2013 (UTC) ::And what is keeping you away from getting engaged in discussions? If you don't agree with the inclusion of Vazgen Sargsyan, let's discuss it. I don't agree with the inclusion of Vazgen I. Don't you think "hardly someone in the world had ever heard about" also applies to him? --] ] 15:10, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
:::Well, as I already said before, I have no sufficient time to fight my point of view, if you think Vazgen Sargsyan deserves to be in the list instead of Vazgen I, keep him untouchable.

Revision as of 15:20, 1 August 2013

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Avdav, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Consider joining the Wikiproject Armenia Let me know if you need any help. - Fedayee (talk) 13:34, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Misplaced Pages:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:57, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Edit warring

Your recent edits at Armenians and {{Infobox Armenians}} show that you're enganged in an edit war. And announcements like this are really counterproductive too. If you don't have time to discuss controversial edits, then please don't make such edits at all. It's as simple as that. You have been asked to discuss the matter at the ANI noticeboard or the relevant talk pages, but you chose not to do so. Please note that all topics related to Armenia (and Azerbaijan) broadly construed may be subject to WP:Discretionary sanctions as set out in this debate by the Arbitration Committee. The decision there says explicitely that "edit warring is harmful. When disagreements arise, users are expected to discuss their differences rationally rather than reverting ad infinitum." If you keep reverting other editors at these two pages without dicussing the desired change, you will be blocked from editing. De728631 (talk) 14:47, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

My intention of editing was related with reducing the amount of notable Armenians, since there is no strictly defined rule which needs to be followed when adding someone to the list. So, I removed less significant (in my opinion) persons. Because hardly someone in the world had ever heard about, f.e. Vazgen Sargsyan. In any case, if this somehow violates policies or is considered as a harmful action, I do express my sincere apologies. Avdav (talk) 14:56, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
And what is keeping you away from getting engaged in discussions? If you don't agree with the inclusion of Vazgen Sargsyan, let's discuss it. I don't agree with the inclusion of Vazgen I. Don't you think "hardly someone in the world had ever heard about" also applies to him? --Երևանցի 15:10, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Well, as I already said before, I have no sufficient time to fight my point of view, if you think Vazgen Sargsyan deserves to be in the list instead of Vazgen I, keep him untouchable.