| Revision as of 20:25, 30 July 2013 editSoham321 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,262 edits →Digvijaya Singh← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:37, 6 August 2013 edit undoDarkness Shines (talk | contribs)31,762 edits →Notification: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
| Soham, regarding the edit summary in of yours. You might want to read ]. --] <small>(])</small> 18:43, 30 July 2013 (UTC) | Soham, regarding the edit summary in of yours. You might want to read ]. --] <small>(])</small> 18:43, 30 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :Thank you for this information. ] (]) 20:25, 30 July 2013 (UTC) | :Thank you for this information. ] (]) 20:25, 30 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == Notification == | |||
| {{Ivmbox | image = yes | The ] has permitted ] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at ]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to ], ], and ]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], satisfy any ], or follow any ]. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "]" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at ], with the appropriate sections of ], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This is a non administrator notification, and will be logged as such on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} --> | valign = center | ] }} As Sitush has already let you know of the ] sanctions in the topic area I am posting this notification. Please follow the links and see what these discretionary sanctions entail. ] (]) 17:37, 6 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:37, 6 August 2013
- Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Misplaced Pages:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Please bear these points in mind while editing Misplaced Pages
- Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Misplaced Pages's core policies.
- Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Misplaced Pages page and follow Misplaced Pages's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
- No edit warring or sock puppetry.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
- Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
- Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Misplaced Pages is not a forum.
Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages. When you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:31, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to Misplaced Pages: check out the Teahouse!
|
Hello! Soham321, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Misplaced Pages for new editors to ask questions about editing Misplaced Pages, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! JackFrost2121(Frostbitten?/ My Work) 03:18, 23 May 2013 (UTC) |
Digvijaya Singh
Hi Soham, Just because you say so doesnt make it a WP policy, i already have a section an hour before you reverted my edits. Dont try to edit war. Involve in healthy discussion and gain consensus in the talk page before you edit(revert other peoples contribution) in that page especially when the section to discuss already existed before your reverts. And stop bullying other users claiming some unknown admin has warned people who are trying to interact with you. Also your edit summary shows that you reverted my edits disregarding WP:DRNC - so please try to remain constructive. A m i t 웃 23:00, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
- Soham, you can't go around reverting other editors and claiming that only your version is neutral. Also, edit summaries like this one are combative and pointless because it is meaningless to invoke policy without explanation. If you persist in doing this, you may end up blocked. --regentspark (comment) 01:29, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
- Please see the talk page of the article for my explanation.Soham321 (talk) 10:32, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
- Regarding your post on the article talk page, I have no interest in what the article says. But, as a general rule, you want to be careful how you go about editing. Content is not determined by one person alone but must be arrived collaboratively through a process of consensus building. The best way to do that is to use the talk page when you're making edits that might be controversial (removing large scale pieces of text and/or finding yourself reverted are indications that the material is controversial). In that case, give your reasons on the talk page and ask others to explain their objections - relying on reliable sources to figure out what the appropriate content is. If you don't get resolution on the talk page, use some form of dispute resolution. Hope all this helps. --regentspark (comment) 17:51, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
- I am relatively a newbie to wikipedia and i was simply emulating what other posters--who appeared to be more experienced than me based on their posting history--were doing. I can give you other examples of where one person has simply removed an existing edit on what i personally thought were frivolous reasons. If you can explain to me whether the removal of these edits was violative of wikipedia policy then i would greatly appreciate it. I can point out in which articles this has occurred (and i am not talking of the Narendra Modi page now). I realize completely that edits have to be built through consensus, but what if multiple editors gang up together and try and blackball a politician they dislike using half truths and falsehoods.Soham321 (talk) 18:08, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
- Regarding your post on the article talk page, I have no interest in what the article says. But, as a general rule, you want to be careful how you go about editing. Content is not determined by one person alone but must be arrived collaboratively through a process of consensus building. The best way to do that is to use the talk page when you're making edits that might be controversial (removing large scale pieces of text and/or finding yourself reverted are indications that the material is controversial). In that case, give your reasons on the talk page and ask others to explain their objections - relying on reliable sources to figure out what the appropriate content is. If you don't get resolution on the talk page, use some form of dispute resolution. Hope all this helps. --regentspark (comment) 17:51, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
- Please see the talk page of the article for my explanation.Soham321 (talk) 10:32, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Soham, regarding the edit summary in this edit of yours. You might want to read WP:Vandalism. --regentspark (comment) 18:43, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for this information. Soham321 (talk) 20:25, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Notification
File:YesThe Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This is a non administrator notification, and will be logged as such on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.
As Sitush has already let you know of the WP:ARBIP sanctions in the topic area I am posting this notification. Please follow the links and see what these discretionary sanctions entail. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:37, 6 August 2013 (UTC)