Misplaced Pages

Danny Nalliah: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:54, 3 June 2006 editAndjam (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers5,332 edits NPOV, added references← Previous edit Revision as of 05:39, 4 June 2006 edit undoVanished user 5zariu3jisj0j4irj (talk | contribs)36,325 edits revert, while keeping referencesNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Danny Nalliah''' (born ]) is an ]n ] evangelist pastor. He is the leader of ], a prayer organisation, and the President of the ]-affiliated ]. In a landmark case, along with his colleague Daniel Scot, Nalliah was found guilty of inciting hatred under ]'s then-new religious vilification laws. He was a candidate for the ]. '''Danny Nalliah''' (born ]) is an ]n ] evangelist pastor and political candidate. He is the leader of ], a prayer organisation, and the President of the ]-affiliated ]. Nalliah is particularly known for his conservative and often incendiary comments about ]. In a landmark case, along with his colleague Daniel Scot, Nalliah was found guilty of inciting hatred under ]'s then-new religious vilification laws.


== Early years == == Early years ==
Nalliah was born in ], ]. He was raised in a strongly religious family, and rose through the church ranks from youth leader through to becoming a pastor. He married in ], and his two children were born soon after. He continued to preach in the more remote regions of Sri Lanka until ], when he and his wife moved to ]. He spent two years preaching Christianity and attempting to circumvent the official ban on the religion in the Muslim state. In ], he decided to move to Australia and found his own evangelical organisation. Nalliah was born in ], ]. He was raised in a strongly religious family, and rose through the church ranks from youth leader through to becoming a pastor. He married in ], and his two children were born soon after. He continued to preach in the more remote regions of Sri Lanka until ], when he and his wife moved to ]. He spent two years preaching Christianity and attempting to circumvent the official ban on the religion in the Muslim state. However, in ], he decided to move to Australia and found his own evangelical organisation.


After moving to Australia and founding Catch the Fire, Nalliah traveled extensively, preaching to congregations in a number of countries. He says that he has witnessed the healing of blind, deaf and crippled people at his prayer sessions, and that a dead girl was resurrected after he prayed for her. <ref name="CTFbio"> retrieved ], ]</ref> After moving to Australia and founding Catch the Fire, Nalliah traveled extensively, preaching to congregations in a number of countries. He claims to have witnessed the healing of blind, deaf and crippled people at his prayer sessions, and claims that a dead girl was resurrected after he prayed for her. <ref name="CTFbio"> retrieved ], ]</ref>


== Nalliah, Islam, and the law == == Nalliah, Islam, and the law ==
On ], ], Nalliah and Scot spoke at a seminar concerning ], sponsored by Catch the Fire Ministries. The seminar was attended by three Australian Muslims, who were invited to attend by May Helou of the ] and the ]. They later launched action under the controversial ], claiming that the intent of the speech had been to vilify Muslims, rather than to discuss Islam itself. The subsequent legal action became the first real test case under the Act, and the Christian community was split, with the ] and ] supporting the Islamic Council, and Pentecostal and evangelical organisations alleging that the law inhibited free speech. On ], ], Nalliah and Scot spoke at a seminar concerning Islam, sponsored by Catch the Fire Ministries. The seminar was attended by three Australian Muslims, who were invited to attend by May Helou of the ] and the ]. They later launched action under the controversial ], claiming that the intent of the speech had been to vilify Muslims, rather than to discuss Islam itself. The subsequent legal action became the first real test case under the Act, and the Christian community was split, with the ] and ] supporting the Islamic Council, and Pentecostal and evangelical organisations alleging that the law inhibited free speech.


In a landmark ruling on ], ], the court ruled that Nalliah and Scot had breached the law. While prison terms are an option under the act, the judge declared that that would not be appropriate in this case, and reserved sentencing for early in ]. Nalliah publicly blasted the verdict, and declared his intention to continue fighting the case, potentially as far as the ]. He said "We may have lost the battle, but the war is not over. The law has to be removed, there is no question." <ref name="TheAgeHistoric"> ], ], ]</ref> In a landmark ruling on ], ], the court ruled that Nalliah and Scot had indeed breached the law. While prison terms are an option under the act, the judge declared that that would not be appropriate in this case, and reserved sentencing for early in ]. Nalliah publicly blasted the verdict, and declared his intention to continue fighting the case, potentially as far as the ]. '']'' newspaper quoted him as stating "We may have lost the battle, but the war is not over. The law has to be removed, there is no question." <ref name="TheAgeHistoric"> ], ], ]</ref>


On ], ], Judge Michael Higgins of the ] delivered his final verdict on the religious vilification issue. He found that financial compensation would be inappropriate, but ordered Nalliah and Scot to take out newspaper advertisements to the value of $68,690 in order to publicly apologise for the comments. Nalliah once again slammed the ruling, comparing the legislation to "] by stealth". He also vowed that he would rather go to jail than comply with the ruling. Nalliah's lawyers have already appealed to the ], alleging both that Higgins showed signs of bias and that the Act itself was unconstitutional. On ], ], Judge Michael Higgins of the ] delivered his final verdict on the religious vilification issue. He found that financial compensation would be inappropriate, but ordered Nalliah and Scot to take out newspaper advertisements to the value of $68,690 in order to publicly apologise for the comments. Nalliah once again slammed the ruling, comparing the legislation to "] by stealth". He also vowed that he would rather go to jail than comply with the ruling. Nalliah's lawyers have already appealed to the ], alleging both that Higgins showed signs of bias and that the Act itself was unconstitutional.

The Act is now opposed by most of the Christian Church, including the Catholic and Uniting Churches, and is (in May ]) under revision in Parliament.


== Politics == == Politics ==
Line 26: Line 24:
* *


== References ==

<references/>


] ]
] ]

] ]
] ]

Revision as of 05:39, 4 June 2006

Danny Nalliah (born 1964) is an Australian Christian evangelist pastor and political candidate. He is the leader of Rise Up Australia, a prayer organisation, and the President of the Assemblies of God-affiliated Catch the Fire Ministries. Nalliah is particularly known for his conservative and often incendiary comments about Muslims. In a landmark case, along with his colleague Daniel Scot, Nalliah was found guilty of inciting hatred under Victoria's then-new religious vilification laws.

Early years

Nalliah was born in Colombo, Sri Lanka. He was raised in a strongly religious family, and rose through the church ranks from youth leader through to becoming a pastor. He married in 1987, and his two children were born soon after. He continued to preach in the more remote regions of Sri Lanka until 1995, when he and his wife moved to Saudi Arabia. He spent two years preaching Christianity and attempting to circumvent the official ban on the religion in the Muslim state. However, in 1997, he decided to move to Australia and found his own evangelical organisation.

After moving to Australia and founding Catch the Fire, Nalliah traveled extensively, preaching to congregations in a number of countries. He claims to have witnessed the healing of blind, deaf and crippled people at his prayer sessions, and claims that a dead girl was resurrected after he prayed for her.

Nalliah, Islam, and the law

On March 9, 2002, Nalliah and Scot spoke at a seminar concerning Islam, sponsored by Catch the Fire Ministries. The seminar was attended by three Australian Muslims, who were invited to attend by May Helou of the Islamic Council of Victoria and the Equal Opportunities Commission, Victoria. They later launched action under the controversial Religious and Racial Tolerance Act, claiming that the intent of the speech had been to vilify Muslims, rather than to discuss Islam itself. The subsequent legal action became the first real test case under the Act, and the Christian community was split, with the Catholic and Uniting Churches supporting the Islamic Council, and Pentecostal and evangelical organisations alleging that the law inhibited free speech.

In a landmark ruling on December 17, 2004, the court ruled that Nalliah and Scot had indeed breached the law. While prison terms are an option under the act, the judge declared that that would not be appropriate in this case, and reserved sentencing for early in 2005. Nalliah publicly blasted the verdict, and declared his intention to continue fighting the case, potentially as far as the High Court of Australia. The Age newspaper quoted him as stating "We may have lost the battle, but the war is not over. The law has to be removed, there is no question."

On June 22, 2005, Judge Michael Higgins of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal delivered his final verdict on the religious vilification issue. He found that financial compensation would be inappropriate, but ordered Nalliah and Scot to take out newspaper advertisements to the value of $68,690 in order to publicly apologise for the comments. Nalliah once again slammed the ruling, comparing the legislation to "sharia law by stealth". He also vowed that he would rather go to jail than comply with the ruling. Nalliah's lawyers have already appealed to the Supreme Court of Victoria, alleging both that Higgins showed signs of bias and that the Act itself was unconstitutional.

Politics

In November 2004, Nalliah campaigned for a seat in the Australian Senate, as a candidate of the Family First Party. However, as he was second on the ticket of five candidates in Victoria, and it is almost impossible for a minor party in Australia to win more than one Senate seat in each state at each election, he had little chance of winning the seat.

Nevertheless, his candidacy caused considerable controversy when conservative National Party Senate candidate Barnaby Joyce launched a heavily publicised attack on Family First (which his party had exchanged preferences with) the day before the election. Joyce used some of Nalliah's statements to illustrate why, in his words, "these are not the sort of people you do preference deals with" - most notably a quote from one of Nalliah's brochures that asked parishoners to pray to their god in order that he might "pull down Satan's strongholds", which were classed as, among other things, mosques and temples, with Buddhists and Hindus specifically singled out.

Books

  • Worship Under the Sword, Danny Nalliah

External links

  1. Catch The Fire Ministries biography retrieved June 3, 2006
  2. Historic win in religious hatred case The Age, December 18, 2004
Categories: