Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jattnijj: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:14, 13 August 2013 editMusikAnimal (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Interface administrators, Administrators120,542 edits Final warning: note on refs← Previous edit Revision as of 05:41, 14 August 2013 edit undoQwyrxian (talk | contribs)57,186 edits another formal warningNext edit →
Line 150: Line 150:
] (]) 16:00, 13 August 2013 (UTC) ] (]) 16:00, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
:Hello, I am unsure if your recent changes to ] play a role in the aforementioned edit war, but you incorrectly attempted to add references. See ] on how to add references, and ] on how to determine if they constitute as reliable sources. Thanks! — ] ] 22:14, 13 August 2013 (UTC) :Hello, I am unsure if your recent changes to ] play a role in the aforementioned edit war, but you incorrectly attempted to add references. See ] on how to add references, and ] on how to determine if they constitute as reliable sources. Thanks! — ] ] 22:14, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

::And I need to give you the other following formal warning:
{{uw-castewarning}} ] (]) 05:41, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:41, 14 August 2013

http://www.sikhcoalition.org/about-sikhs/history/dhttp://www.sikhcoalition.org/about-sikhs/history/dasam-granth-its-historysam-granth-its-historyttp://www.sikhcoalition.org/about-sikhs/history/dasam-granth-its-history{unblock reviewed| reason= Guys Please don't misunderstand me but this article and the other one are the incorrect they are at best propaganda And I don't know how to use wiki or the conventions Jattnijj (talk)|decline=You are blocked for edit warring; you'll need to address that in your unblock request. --jpgordon 18:38, 3 August 2013 (UTC)}} I would decline your request if I were an admin (I'm not), but still, I am not convinced by your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Insulam Simia (talk) 17:27, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Are you knowledgeable about Sikhism?

No, but that's nothing to do with your unblock request (I just saw your unblock request on recent changes). And if you don't understand Misplaced Pages, then:
Hello, Jattnijj! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Misplaced Pages. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Misplaced Pages, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Insulam Simia (talk) 17:41, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous
There ya' go. Insulam Simia (talk) 17:41, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

I also provided references - they were deleted !!!! http://www.sikhcoalition.org/about-sikhs/history/dasam-granth-its-history http://sikhspectrum.com/2006/02/misrepresenting-sikhism-as-vedantic-philosophy/


Where were the personal attacks? Im sure your friends are capable enough to present their arguments themselves.....

Recent edits to Sarbloh Granth

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the Sarbloh Granth article. While Misplaced Pages welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you! AsceticRosé 10:55, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Information icon Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Sarbloh Granth, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Flyer22 (talk) 11:15, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to Dasam Granth, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 16:05, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sarbloh Granth may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Sikh scriptures}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:07, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dasam Granth may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ] containing texts unlikely to be associated with the tenth ], ].<ref name=
  • | title = The Encyclopaedia Of Indian Literature (Volume One (A To Devo), Volume 1

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:15, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

http://www.sikhcoalition.org/about-sikhs/history/dasam-granth-its-history== Your edits == Hello, please do not edit or add any further content to the articles without first following some of the links provided in the messages above. You may not add your personal opinions to the encyclopedia's articles. Thank you, Dawnseeker2000 16:13, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Most of article is opimiom or propaganda, do you know anything about sikhism? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jattnijj (talkcontribs)

Adding more opinion is not OK. Please do not continue to add unsourced material. If you are unsure how to add a reference, please view this tutorial. Thanks again, Dawnseeker2000 16:41, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to User talk:Razorflame with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Razorflame 16:41, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Dawnseeker2000. Razorflame 16:43, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Mark Arsten (talk) 17:05, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Information icon Welcome to Misplaced Pages. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Jat people, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 12:40, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Sarbloh Granth with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —MelbourneStar 12:48, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to Jat people with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. —MelbourneStar 13:15, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Dasam Granth. This contravenes Misplaced Pages's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Sitush (talk) 13:16, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Why did you remove the references

http://sikhspectrum.com/2006/02/misrepresenting-sikhism-as-vedantic-philosophy/

http://www.sikhcoalition.org/about-sikhs/history/dasam-granth-its-history

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Jat people. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. SudoGhost 19:45, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  - Barek (talkcontribs) - 20:55, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jat people may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |caption=<small>Chaudhary ], the first kisan ], accompanied by his wife, on his way to address the nation at the ], ],

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:15, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Final warning

Despite several previous blocks, you are continuing to edit war, lob personal attacks at other users, and generally not edit according to our rules. The next time you break our editing policies, you will be blocked again, and for much longer than your previous blocks (as in, a month or more). It's time for you to slow down, learn about some of our policies (links have been provided to you above), actually check articles and references before removing verified information, and engaging in discussion rather than edit warring when your edits are disputed. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:58, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

I beg to differ the sources used are not balanced or reflective of the different views - if you have an argument please present it, but you should also know something about the subject matter otherwise you cannot discriminate between misrepresentation, mistake and coherent arguments. Jattnijj (talk) 16:00, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I am unsure if your recent changes to Sarbloh Granth play a role in the aforementioned edit war, but you incorrectly attempted to add references. See WP:REFBEGIN on how to add references, and WP:RELY on how to determine if they constitute as reliable sources. Thanks! — MusikAnimal 22:14, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
And I need to give you the other following formal warning:

Template:Uw-castewarning Qwyrxian (talk) 05:41, 14 August 2013 (UTC)