| Revision as of 16:27, 2 September 2013 editJohn Carter (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users176,670 edits →GHeb article tagging: comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:49, 2 September 2013 edit undoIgnocrates (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,170 edits →GHeb article tagging: your disruptive behavior is not an acceptable substitute for a lack of competenceNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| ::Yes, that's another way to resolve the dispute that would work. As of now, the article is pointing to the ] section of the ] article. ] (]) 13:29, 2 September 2013 (UTC) | ::Yes, that's another way to resolve the dispute that would work. As of now, the article is pointing to the ] section of the ] article. ] (]) 13:29, 2 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :::And that pointer is insufficient to meet guidelines, as I have pointed out on the talk page, I believe more than once, that pointer, wherever it is, does not meet the standards of ]. PiCo, I regret that the often infantile behavior which unfortunately is to be expected from one party has spilled out to your talk page. I do hope that you have been looking at the noticeboards where one editor who recently took shots at you is being bereated rather soundly. If, by chance, that person's conduct played a role in your retirement, I think there is a very real chance that that person will not be a problem much longer. ] (]) 16:27, 2 September 2013 (UTC) | :::And that pointer is insufficient to meet guidelines, as I have pointed out on the talk page, I believe more than once, that pointer, wherever it is, does not meet the standards of ]. PiCo, I regret that the often infantile behavior which unfortunately is to be expected from one party has spilled out to your talk page. I do hope that you have been looking at the noticeboards where one editor who recently took shots at you is being bereated rather soundly. If, by chance, that person's conduct played a role in your retirement, I think there is a very real chance that that person will not be a problem much longer. ] (]) 16:27, 2 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ::::That's a curious argument to make since ] is the parent article and ] is the ] from that article. Face it John Carter, you are synonymous with ] - the archetypal editor who literally knows nothing about the subject - yet you continue to pick at a point relentlessly that can be rather easily be resolved in multiple ways that would receive majority support. ] (]) 16:49, 2 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:49, 2 September 2013
Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages as of June 2013.Disambiguation link notification for September 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Book of Ezekiel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tammuz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:31, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
GHeb article tagging
As a co-author, how do you want to handle the unbalanced tag on Gospel of the Hebrews? John Carter's tag-spamming follows a predictable pattern of disruption. It is a clear case of ignoring the input from the recent content RfC, which reaffirmed the previous consensus, and edit-warring against that consensus. Ignocrates (talk) 01:09, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
- John Carter's concerns can be handled on Hebrew Gospel hypothesis - there could be a hatnote on Gospel of the Hebrews directing readers to the other related articles (Ebionites, Nazoreans, and Hypothesis). I'm about to undertake a fair amount of air travel (hate it - like to arrive, but not to get there) so will be more or less out of touch for a few days. PiCo (talk) 03:01, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, that's another way to resolve the dispute that would work. As of now, the article is pointing to the History of scholarship section of the Jewish-Christian gospels article. Ignocrates (talk) 13:29, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
- And that pointer is insufficient to meet guidelines, as I have pointed out on the talk page, I believe more than once, that pointer, wherever it is, does not meet the standards of WP:SPINOUT. PiCo, I regret that the often infantile behavior which unfortunately is to be expected from one party has spilled out to your talk page. I do hope that you have been looking at the noticeboards where one editor who recently took shots at you is being bereated rather soundly. If, by chance, that person's conduct played a role in your retirement, I think there is a very real chance that that person will not be a problem much longer. John Carter (talk) 16:27, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
- That's a curious argument to make since Jewish-Christian gospels is the parent article and Gospel of the Hebrews is the WP:SPINOUT from that article. Face it John Carter, you are synonymous with Randy from Boise - the archetypal editor who literally knows nothing about the subject - yet you continue to pick at a point relentlessly that can be rather easily be resolved in multiple ways that would receive majority support. Ignocrates (talk) 16:49, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
- And that pointer is insufficient to meet guidelines, as I have pointed out on the talk page, I believe more than once, that pointer, wherever it is, does not meet the standards of WP:SPINOUT. PiCo, I regret that the often infantile behavior which unfortunately is to be expected from one party has spilled out to your talk page. I do hope that you have been looking at the noticeboards where one editor who recently took shots at you is being bereated rather soundly. If, by chance, that person's conduct played a role in your retirement, I think there is a very real chance that that person will not be a problem much longer. John Carter (talk) 16:27, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, that's another way to resolve the dispute that would work. As of now, the article is pointing to the History of scholarship section of the Jewish-Christian gospels article. Ignocrates (talk) 13:29, 2 September 2013 (UTC)