| Revision as of 14:21, 3 September 2013 editGerda Arendt (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers380,658 edits →Incident: peace above all← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:29, 3 September 2013 edit undoSilkTork (talk | contribs)Administrators104,124 edits →Incident: commentingNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| You are right: "Discussions matter. And the tone of our voice, and the reasoned quality of our arguments can achieve more profound change, much quicker, than passion and resentment." You are right, I became too passionate once here on your talk. But please show me one instance in an infobox discussion where I raised my voice or lost being reasonable. - Please visit my user page: I cherish peace above all, and that "every user is a human being". --] (]) 14:21, 3 September 2013 (UTC) | You are right: "Discussions matter. And the tone of our voice, and the reasoned quality of our arguments can achieve more profound change, much quicker, than passion and resentment." You are right, I became too passionate once here on your talk. But please show me one instance in an infobox discussion where I raised my voice or lost being reasonable. - Please visit my user page: I cherish peace above all, and that "every user is a human being". --] (]) 14:21, 3 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :Gerda, we've had evidence that you got involved in agitating to have infoboxes on certain FA around the time they are listed on the main page, even though you were aware that infoboxes in such articles was controversial and opposed. ''']''' ''']''' 14:29, 3 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == A barnstar for you! == | == A barnstar for you! == | ||
Revision as of 14:29, 3 September 2013
SilkTork
I will listen to you, especially when we disagree. Barack Obama
Incident
Regarding the Infobox case (on Götterdämmerung, I pleaded already like Abraham with God, please forgive me) you said about the Planyavsky incident "That was one incident out of a number that I took into consideration." Please give me one more. - You will probably know that two editors left over the case, and I left the contentious projects not to cause more trouble. Please, no more victims, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:09, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
ps: looking at the incident again that you mentioned, Andy didn't even insert an infobox, he only got one up to the normal position.. Consider mercy, with me, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:22, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
You are right: "Discussions matter. And the tone of our voice, and the reasoned quality of our arguments can achieve more profound change, much quicker, than passion and resentment." You are right, I became too passionate once here on your talk. But please show me one instance in an infobox discussion where I raised my voice or lost being reasonable. - Please visit my user page: I cherish peace above all, and that "every user is a human being". --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:21, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- Gerda, we've had evidence that you got involved in agitating to have infoboxes on certain FA around the time they are listed on the main page, even though you were aware that infoboxes in such articles was controversial and opposed. SilkTork 14:29, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| To SilkTork, for your contributions as moderator of the Tea Party movement structured discussion. You did a lot of good to that discussion, and I only remembered I hadn't thanked you for it when we were putting the finishing touches to the arbitration decision today. Keep up the fantastic work! AGK 00:50, 3 September 2013 (UTC) |