Revision as of 18:15, 5 June 2006 editKnoThanqs (talk | contribs)1 edit Your endless issues with RobertTurkel.jpg← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:30, 6 June 2006 edit undoHipocrite (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,615 edits 3rrNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== CS Lewis == | == CS Lewis == | ||
Line 16: | Line 14: | ||
Kno | Kno | ||
== 3rr == | |||
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages under the ], which states that nobody may ] an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the ''effect'' of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR --> ] - ] 19:30, 6 June 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:30, 6 June 2006
CS Lewis
Hi! I'm just encouraging you to weigh-in on the CS Lewis talk page concerning the "trivial" information you have removed form the article. There was a discussion going, but it seems to have ran out of steam. Personally, I agree that the info is of dubious relevance in the article, but I feel that some sort of consensus should be reached before it is removed. Please feel free to add your thoughts. Cheers, Martin 01:12, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Your endless issues with RobertTurkel.jpg
Ken:
It would serve me well to have Turkel send an authentic email to the Misplaced Pages editors. Once he does so, I can forward to the editors Turkel's email with his attached picture. By comparing the headers of the two emails, they can establish that Turkel was the author and sender of both emails, thus authenticating the picture.
Then I'll expand Turkel's Misplaced Pages article to include the fact that he lied to the editors.
Sorry about the delay in responding to you. "Go to talk page" meant absolutely nothing to me until today. For the longest time, I thought you were talking about something on TheologyWeb.
Kno
3rr
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Hipocrite - «Talk» 19:30, 6 June 2006 (UTC)