| Revision as of 15:55, 8 September 2013 editHijiri88 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users37,389 edits →Comments by other users← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:53, 10 September 2013 edit undoToddy1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers48,658 edits →Comments by other users: We really do need a check-userNext edit → | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| ::*I'm well aware of what Toddy1 said, Hijiri, but you seriously need to calm down before you get yourself in some very hot water. And regardless of whether Toddy1 is defending Joshu or not, your threat was out of line and only strengthens your opponents' cases. ] ] 15:44, 8 September 2013 (UTC) | ::*I'm well aware of what Toddy1 said, Hijiri, but you seriously need to calm down before you get yourself in some very hot water. And regardless of whether Toddy1 is defending Joshu or not, your threat was out of line and only strengthens your opponents' cases. ] ] 15:44, 8 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ::::Yeah, I know. That's why I softened it in my latest response on ANI, and why I intend not to post in that thread again. It's also why I apologized for my use of foul language yesterday. I in fact thought we were done, but then Toddy started provoking me again. If it continues after this SPI and that ANI thread ar closed I'm going to request an IBAN. ] (<small>]]</small>) 15:55, 8 September 2013 (UTC) | ::::Yeah, I know. That's why I softened it in my latest response on ANI, and why I intend not to post in that thread again. It's also why I apologized for my use of foul language yesterday. I in fact thought we were done, but then Toddy started provoking me again. If it continues after this SPI and that ANI thread ar closed I'm going to request an IBAN. ] (<small>]]</small>) 15:55, 8 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :::::I have very good reason to think that this person has at least one active "good hat" sock puppet; maybe more. However, bearing in mind the bullying I have received, I am not willing to name them. If he/she is innocent, my naming him/her here will expose him/her to bullying, harassment and bear-baiting just as I have received in the past week. We very much need a check user. | |||
| :::::I find Hijiri88's reaction to my asking for a check user on the suspected sock rather puzzling. I would have expected him/her to be delighted if a check user uncovered more socks of someone who has a grudge against Hijiri88.--] (]) 07:53, 10 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ||
Revision as of 07:53, 10 September 2013
JoshuSasori
JoshuSasori (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/JoshuSasori/Archive.
08 September 2013
– This SPI case is open.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Mister nine millimetre (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
WP:DUCK. SPA for attack on Hijiri88; identifies as sock of unnamed previous user in first post. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:27, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- The user was not unnamed. Look more closely at the post you just linked to. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 02:27, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I think it would be a good idea to run a check user.--Toddy1 (talk) 12:18, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- Wow. Toddy1, if you don't cease your unprovoked campaign of harassment and don't stop defending JoshuSasori you're probably headed for a world of pain. Just ask LittleBenW how this course of action worked out for him. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 15:06, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- Uh, Hijiri, it's equally possible that Toddy1 thinks it is a good idea to CU this account in case there are any more sleepers, even if they have defended Joshu in the past - I think a CU should be run for sleepers. Also, threatening people this clearly in that way is really not a good idea, and gives the likes of Joshu more ammunition... Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:10, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- Check the post Toddy made on the sock's talk page immediately before posting here. "Hijiri and IIO are accusing you of being a sockpuppet, so please comment there." He stopped just short of saying "I know you're really a good person and Hijiri is a dog who should be blocked" (although he said that last part a bunch of times already anyway, and has yet to apologize). I know for a fact that whether or not there are sleepers, JS almost certainly has another "good" sock along the lines of Mysterious Island, Wistchars and Slowends. CU would save me some time checking around the Japanese cinema articles and JoshuSasori's old workspace, but... Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 15:38, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- I'm well aware of what Toddy1 said, Hijiri, but you seriously need to calm down before you get yourself in some very hot water. And regardless of whether Toddy1 is defending Joshu or not, your threat was out of line and only strengthens your opponents' cases. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:44, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, I know. That's why I softened it in my latest response on ANI, and why I intend not to post in that thread again. It's also why I apologized for my use of foul language yesterday. I in fact thought we were done, but then Toddy started provoking me again. If it continues after this SPI and that ANI thread ar closed I'm going to request an IBAN. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 15:55, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- I have very good reason to think that this person has at least one active "good hat" sock puppet; maybe more. However, bearing in mind the bullying I have received, I am not willing to name them. If he/she is innocent, my naming him/her here will expose him/her to bullying, harassment and bear-baiting just as I have received in the past week. We very much need a check user.
- Yeah, I know. That's why I softened it in my latest response on ANI, and why I intend not to post in that thread again. It's also why I apologized for my use of foul language yesterday. I in fact thought we were done, but then Toddy started provoking me again. If it continues after this SPI and that ANI thread ar closed I'm going to request an IBAN. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 15:55, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- Check the post Toddy made on the sock's talk page immediately before posting here. "Hijiri and IIO are accusing you of being a sockpuppet, so please comment there." He stopped just short of saying "I know you're really a good person and Hijiri is a dog who should be blocked" (although he said that last part a bunch of times already anyway, and has yet to apologize). I know for a fact that whether or not there are sleepers, JS almost certainly has another "good" sock along the lines of Mysterious Island, Wistchars and Slowends. CU would save me some time checking around the Japanese cinema articles and JoshuSasori's old workspace, but... Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 15:38, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- I find Hijiri88's reaction to my asking for a check user on the suspected sock rather puzzling. I would have expected him/her to be delighted if a check user uncovered more socks of someone who has a grudge against Hijiri88.--Toddy1 (talk) 07:53, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I don't know if it's User:JoshuSasori or not, but it's obviously a sock, since, well, it basically explicitly states to having been in past disputes with Hijiri88. I've indeff'd the account; if someone still wants to run a CU to find out who the master is or look for sleepers, feel free. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:15, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Categories: