| Revision as of 08:04, 4 February 2006 editJensbn (talk | contribs)2,199 editsmNo edit summary | Revision as of 21:07, 6 June 2006 edit undo151.205.8.146 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| Re:violations of airspace vs 'entering' airspace. It is a clear case of a violation, please see ] and talk pages. Please do not revert to ''entered''. 'violated' is accurate, neutral, and carries more information than 'entered'. ] 08:04, 4 February 2006 (UTC) | Re:violations of airspace vs 'entering' airspace. It is a clear case of a violation, please see ] and talk pages. Please do not revert to ''entered''. 'violated' is accurate, neutral, and carries more information than 'entered'. ] 08:04, 4 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :So are you going to lodge any actual reason for your summary reverts or just laze on the trail of PatCheng's wikistalking and the word "violations"? ] 21:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:07, 6 June 2006
Before reverting changes by others to the article, please argue your reasons here. Let reason, argument and evidence win.
Re:violations of airspace vs 'entering' airspace. It is a clear case of a violation, please see Brothers to the Rescue and talk pages. Please do not revert to entered. 'violated' is accurate, neutral, and carries more information than 'entered'. Jens Nielsen 08:04, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- So are you going to lodge any actual reason for your summary reverts or just laze on the trail of PatCheng's wikistalking and the word "violations"? 151.205.8.146 21:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC)