Misplaced Pages

User talk:Plot Spoiler: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:39, 13 September 2013 editPatapsco913 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users166,596 edits Thomas Kaplan← Previous edit Revision as of 07:49, 15 September 2013 edit undoSandstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators188,191 edits Arbitration enforcement sanction: WP:ARBPIA: new sectionNext edit →
Line 30: Line 30:
:Ok, thanks. Will do. ] (]) 23:50, 9 September 2013 (UTC) :Ok, thanks. Will do. ] (]) 23:50, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
::why don't you propose your changes on the talk page first before editing. Each fact should have a specific link not a sum at the end of the paragraph. Everything that was existent had a source and then you take it all out.] (]) ::why don't you propose your changes on the talk page first before editing. Each fact should have a specific link not a sum at the end of the paragraph. Everything that was existent had a source and then you take it all out.] (])

== Arbitration enforcement sanction: ] ==

{{Ivmbox
|2=Ambox_warning_pn.svg
|imagesize=40px
|1=The following sanction now applies to you (in accordance with the procedure described at ]):

<blockquote style="text-align: center;">'''You are topic-banned (see ]) from everything related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, initially for three months. The ban may be extended if it is not observed or if similar problems with your editing appear in other topic areas.'''</blockquote>

You have been sanctioned for the reason(s) set down in Arbitration Enforcement request.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an ] under the authority of the ]'s decision at ]. This sanction has been recorded on the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a topic ban, please read the ] to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be ] for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described at ]. I recommend that you use the ] if you wish to submit an appeal. If you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.<!-- This message generated from Template:AE_sanction.--> <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 07:49, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
}}

Revision as of 07:49, 15 September 2013


Archives

1, 2, 3, 4



This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

deleted content at Iran–United States relations

Hi, Plot Spoiler. I don't want to get into an edit war with you, but I wish you would undo your changes at Iran–United States relations. While you might disagree about the reliability of some of these sources, it is not reasonable to exclude publications like ZMag, the Washington Post, and the LA Times without talk page discussion. Furthermore, I think it's not good witiquette to repeat a mass deletion after someone else has contested it. Please restore this content for now, and we can discuss the individual sources on the article's talk page. Thanks, groupuscule (talk) 15:49, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Lia Tarachansky

As much as I agree that it probably should get deleted in its current form, I don't think it quite meets A7. AfD or prod maybe? Daniel (talk) 00:10, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cassidy Hubbarth

What are the issues you have with this? I don't quite get what is the purpose for your disagreement. Can you explain what is the problem here? Pmaster12 (talk) 07:12, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

WP:ARE

Please see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Plot_Spoiler, Sepsis II (talk) 13:33, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Thomas Kaplan

Hey PlotSpoiler, I made some edits to Thomas Kaplan. Take a look. Everything is properly cited. If you have concerns, please take it to the talk page and we can discuss. thanksPatapsco913 (talk)

Ok, thanks. Will do. Plot Spoiler (talk) 23:50, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
why don't you propose your changes on the talk page first before editing. Each fact should have a specific link not a sum at the end of the paragraph. Everything that was existent had a source and then you take it all out.Patapsco913 (talk)

Arbitration enforcement sanction: WP:ARBPIA

The following sanction now applies to you (in accordance with the procedure described at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions):

You are topic-banned (see WP:TBAN) from everything related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, initially for three months. The ban may be extended if it is not observed or if similar problems with your editing appear in other topic areas.

You have been sanctioned for the reason(s) set down in this Arbitration Enforcement request.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision. This sanction has been recorded on the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a topic ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Appeal. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal. If you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.  Sandstein  07:49, 15 September 2013 (UTC)